[Bug admin/25787] New: Xkunz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25787 Bug ID: 25787 Summary: Xkunz Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hadi891043 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12436 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12436&action=edit Hacked -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25677] Changes to --*magic options for pdp11-aout target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677 --- Comment #9 from Stephen Casner --- Another solution, perhaps the most straightforwad one, would be to change the code in adjust_o_magic() to not pad the size of the data section if the size of the bss section is zero. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24769] [RISCV] partial RELRO doesn't work: .got is not in PT_GNU_RELRO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24769 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24600] Support --start-lib --end-lib
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24600 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- This option can sometimes be more useful than a thin archive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20402] ld.bfd for emits *_RELATIVE relocations against SHN_ABS symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20402 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #9 from Fangrui Song --- Can be closed now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24613] ld --help for -z defs and --no-undefined
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #6 from Fangrui Song --- Hi Dilyan and Nick, -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols is very rare. Making `-z defs --warn-unresolved-symbols` warn rather than error may be fine. It is unlikely to cause a friction. # warning % gold a1.o --warn-unresolved-symbols -z defs a1.o(.text+0x1): warning: undefined reference to 'undef' % ld.lld a1.o --warn-unresolved-symbols -z defs ld.lld: warning: undefined symbol: undef >>> referenced by a1.o:(.text+0x1) # error % ld.bfd a1.o --warn-unresolved-symbols -z defs ld.bfd: a1.o: in function `_shared': (.text+0x1): undefined reference to `undef' Another similar option is --unresolved-symbols=report-all. All of GNU ld, gold and lld warn with --warn-unresolved-symbols % ld.bfd a1.o --warn-unresolved-symbols --unresolved-symbols=report-all ld.bfd: a1.o: in function `_shared': (.text+0x1): warning: undefined reference to `undef' My understanding: There are two kinds of unresolved references: 1) from object files 2) from shared objects. --unresolved-symbols= toggles both bits while -z (un)defs and --(no-)allow-shlib-undefined toggles one bit, respectively. I personally favor the fine-grained options over --unresolved-symbols= -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24685] [RISCV] R_RISCV_CALL_PLT should not create a canonical PLT in -no-pie mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685 --- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song --- Ping :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25789] New: [as] duplicate jmp when .nops and jmp are used together
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25789 Bug ID: 25789 Summary: [as] duplicate jmp when .nops and jmp are used together Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: i at maskray dot me Target Milestone: --- foo: ret .nops 88 jmp foo => : 0: c3 ret 1: eb 56 jmp59 3: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] e: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 19: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 24: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 2f: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 3a: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 45: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 50: 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 nopWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0] 59: eb a5 jmp0 -- jmp foo .nops 128 foo: ret => : 0: e9 80 00 00 00 jmp85 5: eb 7e jmp85 7: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 12: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 1d: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 28: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 33: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 3e: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 49: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 54: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 5f: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 6a: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 75: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00data16 nop WORD PTR cs:[rax+rax*1+0x0] 80: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopDWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25789] [as] x86: duplicate jmp when .nops and jmp are used together
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25789 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Summary|[as] duplicate jmp when |[as] x86: duplicate jmp |.nops and jmp are used |when .nops and jmp are used |together|together -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
