[Bug ld/25210] aarch64: -fix-cortex-a53-835769 --fix-cortex-a53-843419 lead to invalid operation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25210 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Fixed on master and backported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 19543 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in aarch64_wide_constant_p
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19543 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in aarch64_wide_constant_p https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19543#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 19531 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in bpf_cgen_extract_operand
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19531 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in bpf_cgen_extract_operand https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19531#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 19529 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_instruction
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #4 on issue 19529 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_instruction https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19529#c4 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 19532 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in nds32_mask_opcode
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19532 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in nds32_mask_opcode https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19532#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
Issue 19584 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_insn_visium
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #2 on issue 19584 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_insn_visium https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19584#c2 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug ld/25416] New: TLSDESC relaxation doesn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416 Bug ID: 25416 Summary: TLSDESC relaxation doesn Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: x86-64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25416] TLSDESC relaxation doesn't work for x32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TLSDESC relaxation doesn|TLSDESC relaxation doesn't
||work for x32
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
For X32, TLSDESC generates
1. -maddress-mode=short
lea foo@TLSDESC(%rip), %eax
call*foo@TLSCALL(%eax)
2. -maddress-mode=long
lea foo@TLSDESC(%rip), %rax
call*foo@TLSCALL(%rax)
Currently, I got
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tls-x32]$ cat main.c
#include
#include
__thread int bar = 301;
extern int *test1 (int);
extern int *test2 (int);
int
main ()
{
int *p;
p = test1 (30);
if (*p != 30)
abort ();
*p = 40;
test1 (40);
p = test2 (301);
if (*p != 301)
abort ();
if (p != &bar)
abort ();
*p = 40;
test2 (40);
puts ("PASS");
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tls-x32]$ cat tlsdes.S
.text
.p2align 4
.globl test1
.type test1, @function
test1:
.cfi_startproc
subl$8, %esp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
lea foo@TLSDESC(%rip), %eax
call*foo@TLSCALL(%eax)
addl%fs:0, %eax
cmpl%edi, (%eax)
jne .L5
addl$8, %esp
.cfi_remember_state
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
ret
.L5:
.cfi_restore_state
callabort@PLT
.cfi_endproc
.size test1, .-test1
.p2align 4
.globl test2
.type test2, @function
test2:
.cfi_startproc
subl$8, %esp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
lea bar@TLSDESC(%rip), %eax
call*bar@TLSCALL(%eax)
addl%fs:0, %eax
cmpl%edi, (%eax)
jne .L9
addl$8, %esp
.cfi_remember_state
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
ret
.L9:
.cfi_restore_state
callabort@PLT
.cfi_endproc
.size test2, .-test2
.section.tdata,"awT",@progbits
.align 4
.type foo, @object
.size foo, 4
foo:
.long 30
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tls-x32]$ gcc -mx32 tlsdes.S main.c
/usr/local/bin/ld: /tmp/ccdQjj3W.o: TLS transition from
R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC to R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `foo' at 0x5 in section
`.text' failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tls-x32]$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25416] TLSDESC relaxation doesn't work for x32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- For x32, we must encode "lea x@TLSDESC(%rip), %eax" with a REX prefix even if it isn't required. Otherwise linker can’t safely perform GDesc -> LE optimization. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
