[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #9 from Sergey Belyashov --- How to provide changes for ChangeLog and NEWS files? They looks like often updated, so my patch will cause conflicts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support |for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 |for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 |CPUs|CPUs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12127|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12132 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12132&action=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld This is commulative patch with ChangeLog and NEWS files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25277] microblaze opcode enumeration vs ISO/IEC TS 18661-3:2015
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25277 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1d29ab86cb5145cac5045c1a4113d8b8fbd4d9c6 commit 1d29ab86cb5145cac5045c1a4113d8b8fbd4d9c6 Author: Dr N.W. Filardo Date: Thu Dec 19 10:44:50 2019 +1030 PR25277, microblaze opcode enumeration vs ISO/IEC TS 18661-3:2015 fadd, fmul, and fdiv are now, by ISO/IEC TS 18661-3:2015, defined to refer to functions from the runtime subsystem. PR 25277 * microblaze-opcm.h (enum microblaze_instr): Prefix fadd, fmul and fdiv with "mbi_". * microblaze-opc.h (opcodes): Adjust to suit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25277] microblaze opcode enumeration vs ISO/IEC TS 18661-3:2015
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25277 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.34 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25205] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against undefined symbol `pthread_once'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25205 --- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson --- I can reproduce with your object files. I had to add a -B option to find crtbegin.o and libgcc.a. Maybe something wrong with clang on my system. Anyways, what I see is that in _bfd_riscv_relax_section, if there is a PLT then we use it unconditionally. However, in riscv_elf_relocate_section, a PLT is only used if bfd_link_pic, i.e. the output is a shared library or PIE. So we are relaxing using a different symbol address than what we are linking for which causes the trouble. Since this is a linker relaxation problem, it must be _bfd_riscv_relax_section that is wrong. Adding a check for bfd_link_pic solves the linker errors. But there is still a potential problem that we aren't handling undef weak functions in riscv_elf_relocate_section if there is a PLT, which could be a problem if a program is linked to run at a high address out of range of 0. This is common for embedded but probably not for linux, but I think we should still fix it. So I need to add a !bfd_link_pic check there. Now I see stuff like d3d54: 0097auipc ra,0x0 d3d58: 00e7jalrzero # 0 <_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_-0xa0050> d3d5c: e10dbneza0,d3d7e <_ZN4llvm24initializeDumpModulePassERNS_12PassRegistryE+0x86> in the final opt binary which is what I want for a call to an undefined weak function. Curiously, I can't run the opt binary even though ldd says it is OK. I'm not sure what is wrong there but don't think it matters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25205] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against undefined symbol `pthread_once'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25205 --- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 12134 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12134&action=edit untested patch that works for testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
