[Bug binutils/23595] "simple objcopy of executable" failure for msp430-elf with -mlarge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23595 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2542e49e21e6b7270f72c7be0fc4ff1a986371da commit 2542e49e21e6b7270f72c7be0fc4ff1a986371da Author: Jozef Lawrynowicz Date: Mon Sep 3 11:04:05 2018 +0930 PR23595, simple objcopy of executable failure for msp430-elf VMA of the first section in the segment containing the ELF file header (and possibly section headers too) can't be used to reliably find the size of the headers plus padding. What's really needed is sh_offset of the first section assuming it has contents (vma does have a relationship to sh_offset, but is only guaranteed in demand paged executables). If the first section is SHT_NOBITS and it hasn't been converted to have file contents by the existence of a following SHT_PROGBITS section in the same segment, the sh_offset value also isn't reliable. PR 23595 elf.c (copy_elf_program_header): When first segment contains only the headers and SHT_NOBITS sections, use segment p_filesz to calculate header and padding size. Use filepos of the first section otherwise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23591] undefined reference to `__start___sancov_cntrs'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23591 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0d9a433be406220413671495a9b0fab577a48b5e commit 0d9a433be406220413671495a9b0fab577a48b5e Author: Alan Modra Date: Mon Sep 3 10:49:57 2018 +0930 Re: ld: Lookup section in output with the same name Fixes pr23591 test failures on hppa64-hpux and score-elf, and xfails frv-linux and lm32-linux. PR ld/23591 * testsuite/ld-elf/pr23591a.s, * testsuite/ld-elf/pr23591b.s, * testsuite/ld-elf/pr23591c.s: Don't start directives in first column. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr23591.d: xfail frv-linux and lm32-linux. Allow __start___sancov_cntrs as a local symbol. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23595] "simple objcopy of executable" failure for msp430-elf with -mlarge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23595 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.32 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Patch applied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23570] AVR .noinit section defaults to PROGBITS used to be NOBITS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 11226 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11226&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Gabriel, Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it does what you want. Are there any other special sections for the AVR that will need similar handling ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23425] unresolved symbol diagnostic ends up calling find_abstract_instance with relocations applied causing spurious 'DWARF error: invalid abstract instance DIE ref'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jon Grant from comment #5) > There's a testcase for the first attached. Can that be worked on first? No, I need your testcase as well unless it is the same as the one here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23425] unresolved symbol diagnostic ends up calling find_abstract_instance with relocations applied causing spurious 'DWARF error: invalid abstract instance DIE ref'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 11227 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11227&action=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23589] A hang problem for c++filt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23589 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |MOVED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Peng, You are correct, this is a problem with the C++ name demangling code. Unfortunately you have reported it to the wrong place. Although c++filt is part of the binutils project, it gets its C++ demangling facilities from the libiberty library, which actually part of the gcc project. So please could you refile this bug report here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=gcc Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23601] Memory leak dwarf.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23601 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Tianxiao, Thanks very much for reporting this problem. Unfortunately memory leaks like this are not something that we are worried about with this project. They will all be resolved when the objdump program exists, and it is not a program that stays in memory, so the leaks will never become significant. This whilst we acknowledge that there are leaks, we are not going to fix them. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23570] AVR .noinit section defaults to PROGBITS used to be NOBITS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Rauter --- Hi Nick, yes the patch fixes the issue and the .noinit section gets correctly set to NOBITS. Sadly i can not comment on other special sections since i only investigated this issue since it broke a popular custom keyboard firmware when using avr-gcc 8.2. https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/issues/3657 But as far as i can tell the .noinit section is the only one who needs to be set to NOBITS since the section is part of the .bss section. https://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/mem_sections.html I am quiet unsure why gcc stopped setting NOBITS for the .noinit section. They still warn you when you try to initialize a variable set to the .noinit section tough. And it looks like they set the bss flags even commenting it should be nobits https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/config/avr/avr.c?revision=257301&view=markup#l10322. Thanks for your help Gabriel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23570] AVR .noinit section defaults to PROGBITS used to be NOBITS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8744470deabb6a2fae35be0f66c60ee4ba094c1d commit 8744470deabb6a2fae35be0f66c60ee4ba094c1d Author: Nick Clifton Date: Mon Sep 3 17:06:05 2018 +0100 Change the .section directive for the AVR assembler so that the .noinit section is always given the ELF NOBITS section type. PR gas/23570 * config/tc-avr.c (md_pseudo_table): Add entry for "secction". (avr_set_section): New function. Ensures that the .noinit section gets the NOBITS ELF section type. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23570] AVR .noinit section defaults to PROGBITS used to be NOBITS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Gabriel, OK - I have applied the patch. If you come across any more sections that do need special handling, please feel free to reopen this PR. I do not know why the change was made in gcc-land, but I suspect that the reasoning was that "the assembler is the right place for special sections to be handled in special ways". Or something like that. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23425] unresolved symbol diagnostic ends up calling find_abstract_instance with relocations applied causing spurious 'DWARF error: invalid abstract instance DIE ref'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425 --- Comment #11 from Jon Grant --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > Created attachment 11227 [details] > A patch > > Please try this. Hi H.J. Could you attach you Ld binary please? I'm on x64 Ubuntu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
