[Bug ld/23463] FAIL: PR ld/12982

2018-08-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463

--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton  ---
Created attachment 11158
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11158&action=edit
Proposed patch

Hi Dave,

  Sorry about that. :-(  Would you mind testing this alternative patch
  instead please ?  I won't check it in unless you say that it is OK...

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/23460] regression: ar can not create archive containing many (>1024) lto object files

2018-08-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460

--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=36a900f483789dc2ec4bfd31386e29b52fd2e019

commit 36a900f483789dc2ec4bfd31386e29b52fd2e019
Author: H.J. Lu 
Date:   Thu Aug 2 05:00:45 2018 -0700

Add a testcase for PR binutils/23460

Add a testcase to limit open files to 16 for AR with plugin.  Before

commit 103da91bc083f94769e3758175a96d06cef1f8fe
Author: Nick Clifton 
Date:   Wed Aug 1 14:34:41 2018 +0100

Close resource leaks in the BFD library's plugin handler.

it failed with:

../binutils/ar: tmpdir/pr23460f.o: plugin needed to handle lto object

PR binutils/23460
* testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp: Run the PR binutils/23460 test.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460a.c: New file.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460b.c: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460c.c: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460d.c: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460e.c: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr23460f.c: Likewise.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/23463] FAIL: PR ld/12982

2018-08-02 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463

--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Hi Nick,

On 2018-08-02 4:01 AM, nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
>Sorry about that.:-(   Would you mind testing this alternative patch
>instead please ?  I won't check it in unless you say that it is OK...
The patch is OK.

     === ld Summary ===

# of expected passes    1229
# of expected failures  41
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests  33
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/ld-new 2.31.51.20180801

Thanks,
Dave

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/23463] FAIL: PR ld/12982

2018-08-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463

--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8a28fa1b4beb3b4c77c9b3963f1e32235591470d

commit 8a28fa1b4beb3b4c77c9b3963f1e32235591470d
Author: Nick Clifton 
Date:   Thu Aug 2 16:37:12 2018 +0100

Disable the PR12982 test for HPPA targets.

PR 23463
* testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12982.d: Revert previous delta.
* testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp: Skip the pr12982 test for HPPA
targets.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/23463] FAIL: PR ld/12982

2018-08-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463

--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton  ---
Patch applied.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/23481] New: pdp11-aout: @Rn and (Rn) should both be Register Deferred

2018-08-02 Thread cptjustice at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23481

Bug ID: 23481
   Summary: pdp11-aout: @Rn and (Rn) should both be Register
Deferred
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.31
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: cptjustice at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: pdp11-aout

Created attachment 11159
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11159&action=edit
Fixes incorrect output for @Rn and eliminates unnecessary return statements

Currently, @Rn produces relative address deferred instead of register deferred
according to a number of PDP-11 handbooks.

 <.text>:
   0:   1009mov r0, (r1)
   2:   103f fffa   mov r0, *$0x0

The include patch fixes this issue.

It also eliminates a couple of unnecessary early return statements in the
parse_reg function.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils