[Bug gold/22915] Gold doesn't support Intel CET
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22915 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=750ea5ed38abbda8a6f25e276bff3dfc8e4ce0ee commit 750ea5ed38abbda8a6f25e276bff3dfc8e4ce0ee Author: Cary Coutant Date: Fri Jun 22 17:28:05 2018 -0700 Add x86-64 support for Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT). gold/ PR gold/22915 * x86_64.cc (Output_data_plt_x86_64_ibt): New class. (Target_x86_64::do_make_data_plt): (All instantiations) Check for IBT feature bit and create IBT PLTs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22915] Gold doesn't support Intel CET
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22915 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- Added x86-64 and x32 support for binutils 2.31. i386 support not done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22914] Gold doesn't support .note.gnu.property section (NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22914 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=add4131108de4b4a0f3003cb542e9548914fbed1 commit add4131108de4b4a0f3003cb542e9548914fbed1 Author: Cary Coutant Date: Sat Jun 23 00:26:07 2018 -0700 Fix "may be used uninitialized" warning. gold/ PR gold/22914 * x86_64.cc (Target_x86_64::record_gnu_property): Initialize val. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23335] New: MSP430 gas mishandle symbols starting with a register name.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23335 Bug ID: 23335 Summary: MSP430 gas mishandle symbols starting with a register name. Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: suckfish at ihug dot co.nz Target Milestone: --- Target: msp430 Created attachment 11097 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11097&action=edit Source assembly. See attached code. gas treats the symbols 'r5', 'sr' etc. as registers (r5, sr etc.) This happens for PC-relative address mode but not absolute. Noticed on Fedora28 msp430-elf-binutils-5.1.0.0-1.x86_64, also on latest git. Compiling the attached code with msp430-elf-as regs.s -o regs.o, the disassembly is (the first half is bogus, the second half is correct): regs.o: file format elf32-msp430 Disassembly of section .text: <.text>: 0: 05 40 mov r0, r5 ; 2: 04 45 mov r5, r4 ; 4: 01 40 mov r0, r1 ; 6: 04 41 mov r1, r4 ; 8: 02 40 mov r0, r2 ; a: 04 42 mov r2, r4 ; c: 00 40 br r0 ; e: 04 40 mov r0, r4 ; 10: 80 40 00 00 mov r0, 0x ; PC rel. 0x0012 14: 14 40 00 00 mov 0x, r4 ;PC rel. 0x0016 18: 82 40 00 00 mov r0, &0x ; 1c: 14 42 00 00 mov &0x,r4 ;0x 20: 82 40 00 00 mov r0, &0x ; 24: 14 42 00 00 mov &0x,r4 ;0x 28: 82 40 00 00 mov r0, &0x ; 2c: 14 42 00 00 mov &0x,r4 ;0x 30: 82 40 00 00 mov r0, &0x ; 34: 14 42 00 00 mov &0x,r4 ;0x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23335] MSP430 gas mishandle symbols starting with a register name.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23335 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Loader --- Looking at tc-msp430.c, the function check_reg() looks pretty bogus. Any identifier with a prefix which is a register name is accepted as a register. Also numbers in the range 0..15 are accepted as registers, without the 'r' prefix, I am not sure if that is intentional. r01, r011 and r11 are treated inconsistently, the first two the register number is 0, the last one the register number is 11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
