[Bug gas/23154] invalid register expression
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Search for PowerPC ISA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/23156] build breaks with old makeinfo: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:43443: `gdb-add-index man' has no Up field
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23156 Szabolcs Nagy changed: What|Removed |Added Component|build |admin Version|8.1 |2.30 Product|gdb |binutils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/23156] build breaks with old makeinfo: gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:43443: `gdb-add-index man' has no Up field
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23156 Szabolcs Nagy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Szabolcs Nagy --- fixed in 51dcdc52bb8d94d213687d7015c3a234e3dd9cf9 on binutils-2_30-branch (only this branch was affected). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/23155] internal error in set_info_section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155 --- Comment #2 from Alec --- Thanks for the quick response! I can confirm that building manually from trunk fixed the issue. I look forward to the next `binutils` release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/23016] assert in output.h on mix of .eh_frame types for x86_64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23016 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alec.theriault at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- *** Bug 23155 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/23155] internal error in set_info_section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant --- Resolving as duplicate of PR 23016. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23016 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23161] New: __bss_start, _end and _edata aren't marked as hidden
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23161
Bug ID: 23161
Summary: __bss_start, _end and _edata aren't marked as hidden
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: linux
[hjl@gnu-4 tmp]$ cat x.c
void
foo ()
{
}
[hjl@gnu-4 tmp]$ gcc -shared -fpic x.c
[hjl@gnu-4 tmp]$ readelf --dyn-syms a.out
Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 11 entries:
Num:Value Size TypeBind Vis Ndx Name
0: 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND
1: 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND
_ITM_deregisterTMCloneTab
2: 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND __gmon_start__
3: 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT UND
_ITM_registerTMCloneTable
4: 0 FUNCWEAK DEFAULT UND
__cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.2.5 (2)
5: 4018 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT 20 _edata
6: 10f9 2 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11 foo
7: 4020 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT 21 _end
8: 4018 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT 21 __bss_start
9: 1000 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT8 _init
10: 10fc 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 12 _fini
[hjl@gnu-4 tmp]$
__bss_start, _end and _edata shouldn't be in .dynsym.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23161] __bss_start, _end and _edata aren't marked as hidden
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23161 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||23162 Referenced Bugs: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 [Bug 23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23162] New: assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162
Bug ID: 23162
Summary: assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Depends on: 23161
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 bss-1]$ cat x.c
char *heap_start;
extern char *__bss_start;
void my_init_stacktrace()
{
heap_start = (char*) &__bss_start;
}
int
main ()
{
my_init_stacktrace ();
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 bss-1]$ cat foo.c
void
foo (void)
{
}
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 bss-1]$ cat libfoo.map
FOO {
global:
*;
};
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 bss-1]$ make
gcc -m32 -fpie -O2-c -o x.o x.c
gcc -m32 -fpie -O2 -fpic -c -o foo.o foo.c
gcc -m32 -shared -o libfoo.so foo.o -Wl,--version-script,libfoo.map
gcc -m32 -pie -o x x.o libfoo.so -Wl,-R.
/usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.30.51.0.1.20180507 assertion fail
/net/gnu-4/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Makefile:15: x] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 bss-1]$
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23161
[Bug 23161] __bss_start, _end and _edata aren't marked as hidden
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 11002 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11002&action=edit A patch I am testing this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23161] __bss_start, _end and _edata aren't marked as hidden
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23161 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- I agree that exporting these symbols doesn't seem to be useful. I can't see a good reason why anyone would want access to their values in shared libraries external to the given shared library (and to choose a particular _edata say, from among many possible shared libraries requires dlopen and dlsym). Also, given that the standard scripts define these symbols for shared libraries, it isn't simple for a shared library to access their values in the executable. Again, you'd need to use dlopen and dlsym. So it probably isn't that useful to export these symbols from an executable, but I'm less sure about executables than I am about shared libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21929] memory exhaustion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Closing, since it isn't a good idea to try to catch nonsense section sizes in an object file. The problem is that comparing against file size isn't safe. We have compressed and encoded sections that can expand well past the file size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23165] New: Several Memory Leaks in chew of binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23165 Bug ID: 23165 Summary: Several Memory Leaks in chew of binutils Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: mudongliangabcd at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I found several memory leaks with Address Sanitizer or Valgrind. Reproduction method: ``` git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git mkdir obj_clang CC=clang CFLAGS="-g -fsanitize=address" LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" ../configure make cd bfd/doc/ ./chew -f < ../../../bfd/aoutx.h or mkdir obj_native ../configure make cd bfd/doc/ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ./chew -f < ../../../bfd/aoutx.h ``` Result of Address Sanitizer: ``` $ ./chew -f < ../../../bfd/aoutx.h Can't open the input file (null) = ==21926==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4d1cc5 in realloc (/home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/chew+0x4d1cc5) #1 0x5137db in catbuf /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:231:30 #2 0x5128c9 in read_in /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:1505:7 #3 0x50db66 in main /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:1582:3 #4 0x7f573d8f1a86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21a86) Direct leak of 2 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4d1cc5 in realloc (/home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/chew+0x4d1cc5) #1 0x51267f in catchar /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:204:30 #2 0x512b55 in remove_noncomments /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:479:5 #3 0x50dba4 in main /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:1583:3 #4 0x7f573d8f1a86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21a86) Direct leak of 5000 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4d18a0 in malloc (/home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/chew+0x4d18a0) #1 0x513ac9 in init_string_with_size /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:131:26 #2 0x50e269 in init_string /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:138:3 #3 0x50dcfd in main /home/mdl/Downloads/binutils-gdb/obj_afl/bfd/doc/../../../bfd/doc/chew.c:1592:8 #4 0x7f573d8f1a86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21a86) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 345000 byte(s) leaked in 3 allocation(s). ``` Result of Valgrind: ``` https://gist.github.com/mudongliang/03c97f7c39c19c6013c3bd5a549a2282 ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23162] assertion fail binutils/bfd/elf32-i386.c:3953
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11002|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Comment on attachment 11002 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11002 A patch The patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-05/msg00127.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20651] its a minor bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20651 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- So minor that it wasn't even described -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23165] Several Memory Leaks in chew of binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23165 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This tool is only used when building binutils, and only then if you want to regenerate documentation files. Memory leaks in chew are of no importance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
