[Bug ld/23123] New: powerpc32 gcc test g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-[34]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23123 Bug ID: 23123 Summary: powerpc32 gcc test g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-[34] Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- These tests fail on ppc32 if using master or 2.30 branch linkers, due to a missing ifunc relocation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23123] powerpc32 gcc test g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-[34]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23123 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-linux Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22887] null pointer dereference in aout_32_swap_std_reloc_out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22887 --- Comment #9 from rsprudencio at gmail dot com --- It was published with misleading information, giving the idea that only 2.30 was vulnerable, the matter here is clarity of information and which versions were affected, I agree it is low priority, but NVD CVE page noting only 2.30 gives a really weak feedback to community which wishes to automate processes like identifying vulnerable products. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23123] powerpc32 gcc test g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-[34]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23123 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac commit 04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Apr 27 15:46:40 2018 +0930 PR23123, PowerPC32 ifunc regression Two of the gcc ifunc tests fail for ppc32, due to my pr22374 fix being a little too enthusiastic in trimming PLT entries. ppc64 doesn't have the same failures because ppc64_elf_check_relocs happens to set needs_plt for any ifunc reloc. PR 23123 PR 22374 * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't drop plt relocs for ifuncs. * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Comment fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22374] Unnecessary PLT entries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22374 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac commit 04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Apr 27 15:46:40 2018 +0930 PR23123, PowerPC32 ifunc regression Two of the gcc ifunc tests fail for ppc32, due to my pr22374 fix being a little too enthusiastic in trimming PLT entries. ppc64 doesn't have the same failures because ppc64_elf_check_relocs happens to set needs_plt for any ifunc reloc. PR 23123 PR 22374 * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't drop plt relocs for ifuncs. * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Comment fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23123] powerpc32 gcc test g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-[34]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23123 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=69bc498952e7e477d6f96f3b6f900a6112e82350 commit 69bc498952e7e477d6f96f3b6f900a6112e82350 Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Apr 27 15:46:40 2018 +0930 PR23123, PowerPC32 ifunc regression Two of the gcc ifunc tests fail for ppc32, due to my pr22374 fix being a little too enthusiastic in trimming PLT entries. ppc64 doesn't have the same failures because ppc64_elf_check_relocs happens to set needs_plt for any ifunc reloc. PR 23123 PR 22374 * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't drop plt relocs for ifuncs. * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Comment fixes. (cherry picked from commit 04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22374] Unnecessary PLT entries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22374 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=69bc498952e7e477d6f96f3b6f900a6112e82350 commit 69bc498952e7e477d6f96f3b6f900a6112e82350 Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Apr 27 15:46:40 2018 +0930 PR23123, PowerPC32 ifunc regression Two of the gcc ifunc tests fail for ppc32, due to my pr22374 fix being a little too enthusiastic in trimming PLT entries. ppc64 doesn't have the same failures because ppc64_elf_check_relocs happens to set needs_plt for any ifunc reloc. PR 23123 PR 22374 * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't drop plt relocs for ifuncs. * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Comment fixes. (cherry picked from commit 04383fd15b3b82d824df9c72e3ade88c43bfb5ac) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
