[Bug binutils/16504] gold: internal error in override_version, at resolve.cc:61 with -flto
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16504 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Bernhard, thanks for fixing the test case. Looks like I pasted only part of the file. I don't have binutils-2.30 here yet, but I get the same result with binutils-2.29.1-20.fc28.x86_64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/23056] Multiple memory corruption in gprof (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056 --- Comment #4 from Sergej Schumilo --- Hi Nick, it seems like that your patch has fixed the heap overflow bug (or at least the POC file does not reproduce the ASAN report anymore). I can also confirm that the patch for PR 23055 fixed the global buffer overflow. Cheers, Sergej -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/23056] Multiple memory corruption in gprof (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bf82069dce1b1a88560e5d7320342c78372b627e commit bf82069dce1b1a88560e5d7320342c78372b627e Author: Nick Clifton Date: Mon Apr 23 12:52:42 2018 +0100 Prevent an illegal memory access in gprof by ensuring that string tables for aout format files are always zero-terminated. PR 23056 * aoutx.h (aout_get_external_symbols): Allocate an extra byte at the end of the string table, and zero it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/23056] Multiple memory corruption in gprof (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Marco Leise changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Marco.Leise at gmx dot de --- Comment #8 from Marco Leise --- I see this error when building ldc2 1.7.0 or 1.8.0 (the Dlang compiler) with gcc 7.2.0 and binutils 2.29.1 with --ifc=safe when compiling the 32-bit version (using -DMULTILIB=ON): /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.2.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: internal error in get_section_contents, at ../../binutils-2.29.1/gold/icf.cc:467 Unfortunately this is not a small repro case, only another data point. All other special linker flags like --gc-sections or --flto do not affect the outcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23107] New: 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107 Bug ID: 23107 Summary: 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ant.bikineev at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10972 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10972&action=edit patch Hi, I was looking for a way to display offsets of the object files in an archive using ar, but apparently there is none the tool provides. I've prepared and attached a patch that fixes it, yet I'm not sure that offsets should be displayed in the non-verbose mode. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20642] internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467 with --icf=safe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant --- Created attachment 10973 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10973&action=edit Replaces assert with fatal error providing additional info If you can, could you please apply this patch to gold, and rerun your failing build? The additional info in the error message should at least help narrow down the cause of the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23109] New: aarch64: opcode wrongly disassembled as sdot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23109 Bug ID: 23109 Summary: aarch64: opcode wrongly disassembled as sdot Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: i-sourceware-org-2018-2p98rzwefkh at rf dot risimo.net Target Milestone: --- This is about the opcode 0fbcef26 which is disassembled as sdot. $ hexdump bin2 000 26 ef bc 0f 004 $ objdump -D -b binary -maarch64 -Mno-aliases bin2 bin2: file format binary Disassembly of section .data: <.data>: 0: 0fbcef26sdotv6.2s, v25.8b, v28.4b[3] $ The opcode in question: 3322 11 10987654 32109876 54321098 76543210 opcode = 1000 1110 00100110 = 0x08fbcef26 According to the docu I have here the 10th bit should be 0 but it is 1 in the opcode. Therefore the opcode should be rejected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
