[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 --- Comment #5 from Marco Leise --- I use this for callgraphs: operf --vmlinux /usr/src/linux/vmlinux --callgraph ./app_to_be_profiled opreport -c%g -t=0.1% -p=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/,/lib/modules/`uname -r`/video/ And this for detailed samples: operf --vmlinux /usr/src/linux/vmlinux ./app_to_be_profiled opreport -gd%rl -t=1% -p=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/,/lib/modules/`uname -r`/video/ The app needs no instrumentation other than - of course - debug information and should dynamically link with libc. (OProfile also displays time spent in the kernel, so I added the path to the uncompressed vmlinux and modules.) Hope that helps! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23045] Ice in demangler
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23045 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |MOVED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Fiesh, Thanks for reporting this problem. Unfortunately the bug is actually in the C++ demangling functions which are part of the libiberty library. Libiberty is part of the GCC project, it just happens to be used by the binutils project, so it is not maintained by us. Please could you refile this bug report on the gcc bugzilla system here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=gcc Thanks very much. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23045] Ice in demangler
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23045 --- Comment #2 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- Oh, I didn't know it should be reported with GCC! I reported it here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85373 Thank you for your response! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23050] readelf error on sectionless elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23050 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=86c6c6df007cee29f4a723df1a6af1889183fb2e commit 86c6c6df007cee29f4a723df1a6af1889183fb2e Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Apr 12 15:41:07 2018 +0100 Fix the loading of the dynamic string table in a file without sections. PR 23050 * readelf.c (process_dynamic_section): Correct dynamic string table size calculation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23050] readelf error on sectionless elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23050 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jakeherlich, Thanks for reporting this bug. I have now checked in a patch to fix the problem, so I hope that it will not reoccur. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
