[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Hans-Peter, > Um, these tests now fail for my -m32 autotester setup. They do ? I did test with this option enabled and I did not see any unexpected failures... Was this on a 32-bit host ? I must admit that I did not check that particular combination. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22318] ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22318 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 10539 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10539&action=edit Proposed patch Hi H.J. Adding a check for dlsym to config/plugins.m4 appears to work, but you will need to submit this bug report to the gcc project since they control the contents of the config/ directory. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/15152] readelf and objdump don't print strings from .dwz file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15152 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Tom, Please could you upload a compressed executable and its corresponding .dwz file so that I can investigate further ? (Yes, I am lazy... :-) Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22319] New: ld -u not working in new versions of binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22319 Bug ID: 22319 Summary: ld -u not working in new versions of binutils Product: binutils Version: 2.29 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: xavier.orogay at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, we found a bug in 2.27 and 2.29. >From 'man ld' -u symbol Force symbol to be entered in the output file as an undefined symbol However, this flag stopped working on 2.27 onwards. Reproducer: With a "hello world" program $ gcc -c hello.c -o hello.o $ ld -lc -u undefined_symbol -o hello.exe hello.o $ nm hello.exe 'nm hello.exe' should contain "U undefined_symbol" line WE found this issue on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (AltArch), that uses binutils 2.27-9. Then I tested binutils 2.29 on Ubuntu 16.04 (x86_64) with the same result. Best regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22318] ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22318 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=82616 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Created attachment 10539 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi H.J. > > Adding a check for dlsym to config/plugins.m4 appears to work, but you > will need to submit this bug report to the gcc project since they control > the contents of the config/ directory. Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gprof/21968] gprog taking huge time
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21968 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Sandeep, Without more to go on I would say that this is probably expected behaviour. I guess that you have tried gprof from 2.29.1 as well, and found that to be equally slow ? If you care to upload the gmon.out file somewhere (compressed if possible), I will take a look and see if there are any places in the gprof code where we can speed things up. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0fb7012e88683b8bd67a4fb8f782359fa0e11724 commit 0fb7012e88683b8bd67a4fb8f782359fa0e11724 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Oct 19 05:18:07 2017 -0700 sparc: Check bfd_link_executable for TLS check Copied from x86, check bfd_link_executable, instead of bfd_link_pic, for TLS transition check. Not sure if it works correctly. All usages of bfd_link_pic should be audited. PR ld/22263 * elfxx-sparc.c (sparc_elf_tls_transition): Replace bfd_link_pic with !bfd_link_executable, !bfd_link_pic with bfd_link_executable for TLS check. (_bfd_sparc_elf_check_relocs): Likewise. (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. (_bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1ba1f393faac96f6ad80499d7133df23d6187b8c commit 1ba1f393faac96f6ad80499d7133df23d6187b8c Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Oct 19 05:20:44 2017 -0700 tilepro: Check bfd_link_executable for TLS check Copied from x86, check bfd_link_executable, instead of bfd_link_pic, for TLS transition check. Not sure if it works correctly. All usages of bfd_link_pic should be audited. PR ld/22263 * elf32-tilepro.c (tilepro_elf_tls_transition): Replace bfd_link_pic with !bfd_link_executable, !bfd_link_pic with bfd_link_executable for TLS check. (tilepro_elf_check_relocs): Likewise. (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. (tilepro_elf_relocate_section): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=280958942b74f3164708700f195188c4d3446f58 commit 280958942b74f3164708700f195188c4d3446f58 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Oct 19 05:22:23 2017 -0700 tilegx: Check bfd_link_executable for TLS check Copied from x86, check bfd_link_executable, instead of bfd_link_pic, for TLS transition check. Not sure if it works correctly. All usages of bfd_link_pic should be audited. PR ld/22263 * elfxx-tilegx.c (tilegx_elf_tls_transition): Replace bfd_link_pic with !bfd_link_executable, !bfd_link_pic with bfd_link_executable for TLS check. (tilegx_elf_check_relocs): Likewise. (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. (tilegx_elf_relocate_section): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/21621] [avr] Wrong / missing warning "skipping two-word instruction"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=95e42ad4425f0ab0ebfb90035a891be576f9fca4 commit 95e42ad4425f0ab0ebfb90035a891be576f9fca4 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Oct 19 16:21:51 2017 +0100 Fix the AVR assembler so that it will correctly issue warnings about skipped instructions even if subsections are used. PR 21621 * config/tc-avr.h (struct avr_frag_data): Add prev_opcode field. (TC_FRAG_INIT): Define. (avr_frag_init): Add prototype. * config/tc-avr.c (avr_frag_init): New function. (avr_operands): Replace static local 'prev' variable with prev_opcode field in current frag. * testsuite/gas/avr/pr21621.s: New test source file. * testsuite/gas/avr/pr21621.d: New test driver file. * testsuite/gas/avr/pr21621.s: New test error output file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/21621] [avr] Wrong / missing warning "skipping two-word instruction"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Georg-Johann, Fixed as you suggested. :-) Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|XPASS tests in gas and |XPASS tests in gas |unknown successes in ld | --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5) > Hi Hans-Peter, > > > Um, these tests now fail for my -m32 autotester setup. > > They do ? I did test with this option enabled and I did not see any > unexpected failures... Was this on a 32-bit host ? I must admit that I did > not check that particular combination. > > Cheers > Nick They have been consistent since they were added, the difference being whether the bfd_address (I presume) is 32 (xfailing) or 64 bits (xpassing). Anyway, repeatable with CC='gcc -O2 -m32' on a x86_64-linux host, --target=cris-axis-elf alternatively --target=cris-axis-linux-gnu. I see there are no failing ld tests, so I guess that that part is fixed thus I'm adjusting the title. More later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22324] New: Negative .rept count causes out-of-memory
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22324 Bug ID: 22324 Summary: Negative .rept count causes out-of-memory Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: eager at eagercon dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10545 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10545&action=edit Patch - Force .rept count to zero if negative A negative count for the .rept pseudo-opt causes an out-of-memory failure. To reproduce: $ cat test.s .rept -1 .long 3 .endr $ as test.s as: out of memory allocating 18446744073709551607 bytes after a total of 266240 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21294] Binary size regression on PPC embedded (COMMONPAGESIZE 64k)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21294 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- I should note here for future reference that a common-page-size configure option has a difficulty: What exactly would it mean when ld supports multiple targets? Should *all* targets use the given page size, or just the default target? It's likely that neither of those two possible implementations would please everybody.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
