[Bug gold/22291] GOLD silently produces an nonworking dynamic executable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22291 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. > Try this The patch works for me. :-) It will need a gold maintainer to approve it however... Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22309] New: incremental_test_2 failure with GCC 7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22309 Bug ID: 22309 Summary: incremental_test_2 failure with GCC 7 Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- On Fedora 26/x86-64, I got echo g++ -W -Wall-Wstack-usage=262144 -Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -fno-use-linker-plugin -o incremental_test_3 | sed -e 's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Wl,--incremental-update -Wl,-z,norelro -Bgcctestdir/ two_file_test_1.o two_file_test_tmp_3.o two_file_test_2.o two_file_test_main.o gcctestdir/ld: fatal error: out of patch space in section .eh_frame; relink with --incremental-full collect2: error: ld returned 2 exit status make[7]: *** [Makefile:7302: incremental_test_2] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8ef027f00ba0252e22ce548c3d270db978184b5a commit 8ef027f00ba0252e22ce548c3d270db978184b5a Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Oct 18 15:07:36 2017 +0100 Update Cris assembler tests for checks that now pass where they used to fail. PR gas/22304 * testsuite/gas/cris/range-err-1.s: Remove spurious xfails. * testsuite/gas/cris/cris.exp: Expect the shexpr-1 test to pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Agreed - these tests should be expected to pass. I have updated the testsuite accordingly. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||hp at sourceware dot org Resolution|FIXED |--- Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hp at sourceware dot org --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > Hi H.J. > > Agreed - these tests should be expected to pass. I have updated the > testsuite accordingly. > > Cheers > Nick Um, these tests now fail for my -m32 autotester setup. I'm reopening this and assigning it to me for the purpose of adding or using a 32-bit-host xfail mechanism, which did not exist at the time of addition of these tests. Please be patient and wait a few days, ok? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > Um, these tests now fail for my -m32 autotester setup. FAOD, referring to the gas tests, I haven't looked into the ld tests yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22304] XPASS tests in gas and unknown successes in ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22304 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hp at bitrange dot com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22318] New: ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22318 Bug ID: 22318 Summary: ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16' Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When -fsanitize=address is used in CFLAGS to build binutils, I got ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16' config/plugins.m4 has if test "$plugins" = "yes"; then AC_SEARCH_LIBS([dlopen], [dl]) fi plugins use dlsym, but libasan.so only intercepts dlopen, not dlsym: [hjl@gnu-tools-1 binutils-x32-text]$ nm -D /lib64/libasan.so.4| grep " dl" 00038580 W dlclose U dl_iterate_phdr 0004dc50 W dlopen U dlsym U dlvsym [hjl@gnu-tools-1 binutils-x32-text]$ Testing dlopen for libdl leads to false negative when -fsanitize=address is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils