[Bug ld/20932] LD: Internal error during record link assignment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20932 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- Another one I forgot to close -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jonathon.Reinhart at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20832] String merging elf32-i386 object files with elf64-x86-64 ld causes incorrect results
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20832 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 19013 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20811] strip not stripped in the dynamic table
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20811 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- No response from reporter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22239] New: invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239 Bug ID: 22239 Summary: invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c) Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10498 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10498&action=edit stacktrace On 2.29.51.20171002: # objdump -g -D -F -S --file-start-context -l -R -s -W -G -T --special-syms -x $FILE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22239] invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10499 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10499&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
-mfence-as-lock-add option in binutils 2.27
Hi, I found that a new option "-mfence-as-lock-add" is added in binutils 2.27. It generate lock instruction when "-mfence-as-lock-add=yes". Otherwise, mfence, lfence, sfence is generated. Please let me know why this option is required. Why lock instruction is needed. Thanks, Parul ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22240] New: hang of the objdump process
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 Bug ID: 22240 Summary: hang of the objdump process Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10500 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10500&action=edit testcase On 2.29.51.20171002, the attached testcase freezes the objdump process launched with: # objdump -g -D -F -S --file-start-context -l -R -s -W -G -T --special-syms -x $FILE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- also the process uses the 100% of the cpu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: -mfence-as-lock-add option in binutils 2.27
Parul Chahar writes: > I found that a new option "-mfence-as-lock-add" is added in binutils 2.27. > It generate lock instruction when "-mfence-as-lock-add=yes". Otherwise, > mfence, lfence, sfence is generated. > > Please let me know why this option is required. Why lock instruction is > needed. It's not needed, but it can be more efficient. See, for example, https://shipilev.net/blog/2014/on-the-fence-with-dependencies/#_hardware Ian ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] New: Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Bug ID: 22245 Summary: Potential UB in bfd_set_error Product: binutils Version: 2.29 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kryukov at frtk dot ru Target Milestone: --- Hello My student Kirill Nedostoev tried to build binutils 2.29.1 with Clang 7 and he found a following message: ``` bfd.c:519:21: error: passing an object that undergoes default argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Werror,-Wvarargs]` va_start (ap, error_tag); ``` The description of the actual problem is available on CERT site https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/EXP58-CPP.+Pass+an+object+of+the+correct+type+to+va_start As a solution, we suggest to change signature of `bfd_set_error` in a following way: -void bfd_set_error (bfd_error_type error_tag, ...); +void bfd_set_error (int error_tag, ...); To get a patch, you may pull from https://github.com/pavelkryukov/binutils.git Thanks, Pavel Kryukov -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #1 from Pavel I. Kryukov --- Created attachment 10503 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10503&action=edit Fix potential UB in bfd_set_error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/21167] gas v2.28.51 does not include .rel[a] sections to groups
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21167 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2017-10-03 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2017-10-04 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Thanks for the patch. Will apply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9ba5f27cdd15d22d6c5739ff5d2b1c81d796e114 commit 9ba5f27cdd15d22d6c5739ff5d2b1c81d796e114 Author: Pavel I. Kryukov Date: Tue Oct 3 22:42:07 2017 +0300 PR22245, Fix potential UB in bfd_set_error Passing enum as a first argument to variadic argument function may lead to undefined behavior. The explanation on CERT site: https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/ EXP58-CPP.+Pass+an+object+of+the+correct+type+to+va_start The bug was found by Kirill Nedostoev (nedostoev...@phystech.edu) when he tried to build GNU binutils with Clang 7. PR 22245 * bfd.c (bfd_set_error): Avoid UB on passing arg to va_start that undergoes default promotion. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_29-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99ca76d3db25af8e017d7d54df677db0561907f5 commit 99ca76d3db25af8e017d7d54df677db0561907f5 Author: Pavel I. Kryukov Date: Tue Oct 3 22:42:07 2017 +0300 PR22245, Fix potential UB in bfd_set_error Passing enum as a first argument to variadic argument function may lead to undefined behavior. The explanation on CERT site: https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/ EXP58-CPP.+Pass+an+object+of+the+correct+type+to+va_start The bug was found by Kirill Nedostoev (nedostoev...@phystech.edu) when he tried to build GNU binutils with Clang 7. PR 22245 * bfd.c (bfd_set_error): Avoid UB on passing arg to va_start that undergoes default promotion. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. (cherry picked from commit 9ba5f27cdd15d22d6c5739ff5d2b1c81d796e114) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Pavel I. Kryukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Pavel I. Kryukov --- Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
