[Bug ld/22048] Incorrect .eh_frame section in libc.so
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22048 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d7de64088c7ce0d642c73feb66f408c601cffb0d commit d7de64088c7ce0d642c73feb66f408c601cffb0d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Aug 31 03:53:44 2017 -0700 Add a test for PR ld/22048 PR ld/22048 * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22048.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22048a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22048b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run pr22048. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22048] Incorrect .eh_frame section in libc.so
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22048 Bug 22048 depends on bug 22051, which changed state. Bug 22051 Summary: zero terminator in the middle of glibc's .eh_frame https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22051 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22047] Heap out of bounds read in parse_comp_unit()
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22047 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e4f2723003859dc6b33ca0dadbc4a7659ebf1643 commit e4f2723003859dc6b33ca0dadbc4a7659ebf1643 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Aug 31 17:03:23 2017 +0100 Fix buffer read overrun by ensuring that DWARF sections containing strings always end in a NUL byte. PR 22047 * dwarf2.c (read_section): If necessary add a terminating NUL byte to dwarf string sections. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22047] Heap out of bounds read in parse_comp_unit()
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22047 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Kamil, Thanks for reporting this bug. I have checked in a patch to the mainline development sources to fix the problem, by ensuring that any DWARF section containing strings is terminated with a NUL byte when it is read in. I have not applied the patch to the current 2.29 branch however as I am a little bit concerned that I may have overlooked something. So I would like to wait a few days to see if any problems arise with this fix. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22055] New: asw
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22055 Bug ID: 22055 Summary: asw Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ppq.buntu at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10380 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10380&action=edit asw asw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22049] PowerPC VLE: Lower 16 bit address offset not calculated properly in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22049 --- Comment #2 from vincegeg83 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 10381 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10381&action=edit Assembly file to illustrate low 16 bit address problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22049] PowerPC VLE: Lower 16 bit address offset not calculated properly in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22049 vincegeg83 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #3 from vincegeg83 at gmail dot com --- Thanks, can you confirm whether this is correct? It doesn't seem like it: Original assembly (attached as test.s): .org0x100100 e_b begin data0: .short 0x1234 .align 2, 0x44 begin: e_lis r4, data0@ha e_lhz r4, data0@l(r4) _@photon ~/asm $ powerpc-linux-as -many -mvle -mregnames test.s _@photon ~/asm $ powerpc-linux-objdump -dr a.out a.out: file format elf32-powerpc Disassembly of section .text: : ... 100100: 78 00 00 08 e_b 100108 00100104 : 100104: 12 34 44 44 .long 0x1234 00100108 : 100108: 70 80 e0 10 e_lis r4,16 100108: R_PPC_VLE_HA16A .text+0x100104 10010c: 58 84 00 00 e_lhz r4,0(r4) 10010e: R_PPC_ADDR16_LO .text+0x100104 It seems to correctly set the symbol to 0x100104, but note the low 16 bit decoding is wrong, it's using 0 instead of 0x0104. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22049] PowerPC VLE: Lower 16 bit address offset not calculated properly in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22049 vincegeg83 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from vincegeg83 at gmail dot com --- Ok, I think it's been sorted out. I was converting the assembler objection file directly to binary, skipping the linker step. I added this: ld -melf32ppc --section-start=.text=0x100100 test.o -o test_vle.bin ...and it produces the correct machine code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/22055] asw
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22055 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
