[Bug ld/21498] New: ld test failuires
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498 Bug ID: 21498 Summary: ld test failuires Product: binutils Version: 2.28 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: cris-elf I got FAIL: ld-cris/dso-pltdis1 FAIL: ld-cris/dso-pltdis2 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-10 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-11 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-12 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-12b FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-12c FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-13 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-13b FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-14 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-15 FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-15b FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-1c FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-1d FAIL: ld-cris/libdso-2 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-dso-dtpoffd2 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-dso-dtpoffd4 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-dso-tpoffgotcomm1 FAIL: ld-cris/dso12-pltdis FAIL: ld-cris/expdyn1 FAIL: ld-cris/expdyn5 FAIL: ld-cris/expdyn6 FAIL: ld-cris/expdyn7 FAIL: ld-cris/gotplt1 FAIL: ld-cris/gotplt2 FAIL: ld-cris/gotplt3 FAIL: ld-cris/pic-gc-72 FAIL: ld-cris/pic-gc-73 FAIL: ld-cris/pv32-1 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-20 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-20a FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-21 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-22 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-23 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-66 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-80 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-dtpoffd1 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-e-dtpoffd3 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gc-71 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-1 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-1h FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-2 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-2h FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-3 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-gd-3h FAIL: ld-cris/tls-global-74 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-10 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-11 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-78 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-8 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-8e1 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ie-9 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-js1 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ld-4 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ld-5 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ld-6 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ld-7 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgd-14 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgd-15 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgde-14 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgde-15 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgdex-14 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgdex-15 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgdx-14 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ldgdx-15 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-le-12 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-le-12s FAIL: ld-cris/tls-le-13 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-le-13s FAIL: ld-cris/tls-legd-16 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-legd-17 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-legdx-16 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-legdx-17 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-leie-18 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-leie-19 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-54 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-57 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-58 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-59 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-60 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-61 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-63 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-local-64 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ok-30 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ok-32 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ok-34 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-ok-36 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-und-38 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-und-42 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-und-46 FAIL: ld-cris/tls-und-50 FAIL: ld-cris/weakhiddso FAIL: ld-cris/weakref2 FAIL: ld-cris/weakref3 FAIL: ld-cris/weakref4 for cris-elf target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21498] ld test failuires
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by commit 647e4d46495f2bfb0950fd1066c8a660173cca40 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Jun 22 05:37:24 2016 -0700 ld: Add a linker configure option --enable-relro Add a configure option --enable-relro to decide whether -z relro should be enabled in ELF linker by default. Default to yes for all Linux targets, except FRV, HPPA, IA64 and MIPS, since many relro tests fail on these targets. Since those cris tests check for addresses, enable -z relro changes addresses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21498] ld test failuires
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- I can't reproduce it on a different machine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7c871edcd83ccdc5fcd8148a7f433efd6b52255 commit b7c871edcd83ccdc5fcd8148a7f433efd6b52255 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed May 17 07:57:15 2017 -0700 Mark debug sections referenced by kept debug sections If a debug section is referenced by a kept debug section, it should also be kept. Some targets, like mips, keep input files when there are some special sections, like .gnu.attributes, even if input file is unused otherwise. In this case, all debug sections are kept. The new test will fail on such targets. We can either fix those targets or XFAIL the test. bfd/ PR ld/20882 * elflink.c (elf_gc_mark_debug_section): New function. (_bfd_elf_gc_mark_extra_sections): Mark any debug sections referenced by kept debug sections. ld/ PR ld/20882 * testsuite/ld-gc/gc.exp: Run pr20882. * testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882a.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-gc/pr20882c.s: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20882] GNU ld discards sections required by relocations in .debug_info with --gc-sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20882 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.29 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.29. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21498] ld test failuires
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by configuring ld with --enable-relro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21034] binutils/stabs.c:2705: if (**pp == ';' || *pp == '\0')
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21034 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1663acb165d6f3f17a21750e1b1140005d5a25f0 commit 1663acb165d6f3f17a21750e1b1140005d5a25f0 Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu May 18 09:07:26 2017 +0930 Fix compile time warning about pointer comparison. PR 21034 * stabs.c (parse_stab_members): Fix thinko checking for g++ version 1 stabs information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
