[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #18 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f85ae672d555af5543bcda6dce71ff6d7e687b50 commit f85ae672d555af5543bcda6dce71ff6d7e687b50 Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Wed Apr 19 15:27:31 2017 +0200 Fix for PR ld/16044: elf32-cris.c h->plt.refcount inconsistency Backport (cherry-pick) from master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21401] New: -shared -z now doesn't work with undefined IFUNC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21401
Bug ID: 21401
Summary: -shared -z now doesn't work with undefined IFUNC
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-6 foo]$ cat foo.c
extern int library_func2 (void);
int foo (void) { library_func2 (); return 0; }
__asm__(".type library_func2, %gnu_indirect_function");
[hjl@gnu-6 foo]$ make
gcc -B./ -O2 -fPIC -c -o foo.o foo.c
./ld -shared -z now -o foo.so foo.o
./ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.28.51.20170418 internal error, aborting at
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb-linux/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c:6019 in
elf_x86_64_finish_dynamic_symbol
./ld: Please report this bug.
Makefile:14: recipe for target 'foo.so' failed
make: *** [foo.so] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-6 foo]$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21401] -shared -z now doesn't work with undefined IFUNC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21401 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e492d2f8ac653b050019865ba1418fc5b057c00b commit e492d2f8ac653b050019865ba1418fc5b057c00b Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Apr 19 09:59:14 2017 -0700 x86-64: Handle undefined IFUNC symbol with -z now Since undefined IFUNC symbol is treated as normal FUNC symbol, don't abort on undefined IFUNC symbol in the second PLT. bfd/ PR ld/21401 * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_finish_dynamic_symbol): Don't abort on on undefined IFUNC symbol in the second PLT. ld/ PR ld/21401 * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp: Add a libtest-2-now.so test with -z now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21401] -shared -z now doesn't work with undefined IFUNC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21401 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.29 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21402] New: i386: indirect5 failures
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21402 Bug ID: 21402 Summary: i386: indirect5 failures Product: binutils Version: 2.29 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: i386 On Linux/i386, I got FAIL: Run indirect5 3 FAIL: Run indirect5 4 FAIL: indirect5c dynsym FAIL: indirect5d dynsym Running: tmpdir/indirect5c > tmpdir/indirect5c.out child killed: segmentation violation FAIL: Run indirect5 3 Running: tmpdir/indirect5d > tmpdir/indirect5d.out child killed: segmentation violation FAIL: Run indirect5 4 /export/build/gnu/binutils-32bit-misc/build-i686-linux/ld/../binutils/nm-new -D tmpdir/indirect5c > dump.out FAIL: indirect5c dynsym /export/build/gnu/binutils-32bit-misc/build-i686-linux/ld/../binutils/nm-new -D tmpdir/indirect5d > dump.out FAIL: indirect5d dynsym -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21402] i386: indirect5 failures
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21402 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- They are added by commit c5d37467b152fe98f02ac1ff8188e32ecd0def95 Author: Alan Modra Date: Mon Apr 17 18:33:52 2017 +0930 Undo dynamic symbol state after regular object sym type mismatch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21402] i386: indirect5 failures
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21402 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- The new testcases shows bugs in the x86 backend code. elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs is wrongly making "bar", a bfd_link_hash_defined symbol, dynamic. bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol calls there should only change undefweak symbols. The same bug exists for x86_64, but the testcase does not trigger it.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
