[Bug binutils/21013] objdump memory exhausted on several 8k demos
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21013 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9738 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9738&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Aaron, Please could you try out this patch. It only adds an extra error message, explaining why space could not be found to allocate the symbol table. It does not make any attempt to allow objdump to continue working after detecting the error. I felt that doing so would likely add more bugs to objdump, which would be bad. I only tested one file from the repository you indicated, so there may be others that cause objdump to run out of memory in other ways. If you find any like this, please feel free to update this bug report with their names and I will investigate further. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21013] objdump memory exhausted on several 8k demos
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21013 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2017-01-04 Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20992] sparcv9 should be equivalent to sparc64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20992 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=10ab38d930db6159b93082dfe5e41761bdc0d70b commit 10ab38d930db6159b93082dfe5e41761bdc0d70b Author: Norm Jacobs Date: Wed Jan 4 11:49:00 2017 + When configuring GAS treat as sparcv9 target the same way as a sparc64 target. PR gas/20992 * configure.tgt: Treat sparcv9 as sparc64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20992] sparcv9 should be equivalent to sparc64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20992 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Norm, Thanks for the patch. I have applied it to the sources. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Linda, > Binutils: 2.25.1 Have you tried using a more recent version of the binutils ? We are currently on release 2.27 and release 2.28 is about to happen. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20958] yywrap in binutils/syslex.l and ld/ldlex.l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20958 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b055631694967585d0c898ac493e1faa3d5e8ee6 commit b055631694967585d0c898ac493e1faa3d5e8ee6 Author: Dilan Palauzov Date: Wed Jan 4 16:05:22 2017 + Use noyywrap option in lex files. ld PR 20958 * ldlex.l (option): Add noyywrap (yywrap): Delete. * ldlex.h (yywrap): Delete prototype. binutils PR 20958 * syslex.l (option): Add noyywrap (yywrap): Delete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20958] yywrap in binutils/syslex.l and ld/ldlex.l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20958 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Dilyan, Thanks for the bug report and patch. I have checked your patch in, but I have not updated the other lex source files in case it turns out that there is some as yet unseen problem with the patch. Please feel free to ping me in a month or so to update the other files. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20957] dlltool: syntax error in def file libstdc++-6.def:0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20957 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9739 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9739&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Marshall, Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20957] dlltool: syntax error in def file libstdc++-6.def:0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20957 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2017-01-04 Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20946] lookup_mach_via_bfd_name aborts
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20946 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9740 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9740&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Yao, Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20946] lookup_mach_via_bfd_name aborts
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20946 --- Comment #2 from Yao Qi --- Hi Nick, the patch works! (gdb) set architecture fr300 The target architecture is assumed to be fr300 (gdb) disassemble 0,+4 Dump of assembler code from 0x0 to 0x4: 0x: Cannot access memory at address 0x0 (gdb) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
