[Bug binutils/20782] New: FF /2 (CALL Ev) wrong disassembling
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782 Bug ID: 20782 Summary: FF /2 (CALL Ev) wrong disassembling Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: anatolymik at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- FF /2 (CALL Ev) is affected by operand size prefix in 64 bit mode. It's wrong. In 64-bit mode operand size prefix is ignored for this opcode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20783] New: FF /4 (JMP Ev) wrong disassembling
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20783 Bug ID: 20783 Summary: FF /4 (JMP Ev) wrong disassembling Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: anatolymik at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- FF /4 (JMP Ev) is affected by operand size prefix in 64 bit mode. It's wrong. In 64-bit mode operand size prefix is ignored for this opcode and forced to 64-bit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20784] New: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 Bug ID: 20784 Summary: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- [forwarded from https://bugs.debian.org/843339] ld loops indefinitely with binutils trunk. seen with commit 199fa1b7; reverting that one fixes the link. gold works as expected. ld --build-id --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 --hash-style=gnu -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Scrt1.o crti.o crtbeginS.o -L. conftest.o -lxenlight -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed crtendS.o crtn.o test case at https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ld-conftest.tar.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20784] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20785] New: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 Bug ID: 20785 Summary: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- seen with binutils trunk 20161106 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc-linux-gnu (the latter building a 64bit glibc variant). glibc is 2.24 from the 2.24 branch. powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc-6 -m64 ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memset-power4.S -c -isystem /«PKGBUILDDIR»/g libc-2.24/debian/include -I../include -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64/string -I/«PKGBUILDDI R»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv /linux/powerpc/powerpc64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc -I../sys deps/powerpc/nptl -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/include -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/nptl -I../sysd eps/pthread -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/powerpc -I../sys deps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu - I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/po werpc/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt -I../sysdeps/iee e754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic -I.. -I../libio -I. -nostdin c -isystem /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp.powerpc/usr/bin/../lib/gcc-cross/powerpc-linux-gnu/6/include -isystem /«PKGBU ILDDIR»/debian/tmp.powerpc/usr/bin/../lib/gcc-cross/powerpc-linux-gnu/6/include-fixed -isystem /«PKGBUILDDIR»/glib c-2.24/debian/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include /«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64/libc-modules. h -DMODULE_NAME=libc -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DASSEMBLER -pipe -O2 -g -Werror=undef-o /«PKG BUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64/string/memset-power4.o -MD -MP -MF /«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-t ree/powerpc-ppc64/string/memset-power4.o.dt -MT /«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64/string/memset-p ower4.o ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/memset.S: Assembler messages: ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/memset.S:254: Error: operand out of range (5 is not between 0 and 1) ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/memset.S:254: Error: operand out of range (128 is not between 0 and 31) ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/memset.S:254: Error: missing operand /«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/powerpc-ppc64/sysd-rules:1651: recipe for target '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/b uild-tree/powerpc-ppc64/string/memset-power6.o' failed and powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-6 ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memset-power6.S -c -isystem /«PKGBUILDDIR»/gl ibc-2.24/debian/include -I../include -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/glibc-2.24/build-tree/ppc64el-libc/string -I/«PKGBUILDDIR» /glibc-2.24/build-tree/ppc64el-libc -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/li nux/powerpc/powerpc64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc -I../sysdep s/powerpc/nptl -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/include -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/nptl -I../sysdeps /pthread -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/powerpc -I../sysdep s/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/po wer7/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5+/fp u/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power4/fpu/multia rch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc /powerpc64/power7/fpu/ -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5+/fpu -I. ./sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power4/fpu/ -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64 /fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power7/multiarch -I../sysde ps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5+/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powe rpc64/power5/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power4/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8 -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power7/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/ power7 -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power6 -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power5+ -I../sysdeps/powerpc/power5 +/fpu -I
[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu, ||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC||amodra at gmail dot com, ||bergner at vnet dot ibm.com, ||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- The line with the problem is: cmpli cr1,rLEN,128 Thi sis due to Alan's patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-09/msg00217.html I believe that this cmpli should be changed to cmpldi like the other uses in memset.S, so I'm chnaging this to a glibc bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tuliom at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- Hmm, I cannot change this to glibc, but I'm CC'ing Tulio. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- See this comment from include/opcode/i386.h /* The SystemV/386 SVR3.2 assembler, and probably all AT&T derived ix86 Unix assemblers, generate floating point instructions with reversed source and destination registers in certain cases. Unfortunately, gcc and possibly many other programs use this reversed syntax, so we're stuck with it. eg. `fsub %st(3),%st' results in st = st - st(3) as expected, but `fsub %st,%st(3)' results in st(3) = st - st(3), rather than the expected st(3) = st(3) - st This happens with all the non-commutative arithmetic floating point operations with two register operands, where the source register is %st, and destination register is %st(i). The affected opcode map is dceX, dcfX, deeX, defX. */ If you really care, you can define SYSV386_COMPAT to 0 but please read the comment there too.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20772] DC E8-EF wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20772 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20773] DC F0-F7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20773 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20774] DC F8-FF wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20774 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20776] de e0-e7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20776 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20777] de e8-ef wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20777 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20778] de f0-f7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20778 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20779] de f8-ff wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20779 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20771 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
