[Bug ld/20694] New: PDP11 TARGET_PAGE_SIZE is incorrect
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694 Bug ID: 20694 Summary: PDP11 TARGET_PAGE_SIZE is incorrect Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: casner at acm dot org Target Milestone: --- The file ld/emulparams/pdp11.sh includes the line: TARGET_PAGE_SIZE=256 The actual page size of the memory management hardware on the PDP11/45, PDP11/70, etc. is 8192 bytes. A consequence of this error is that the data section in a.out format output is not offset to a page boundary. I have verified that the UNIX V6 ld program running on a simulated PDP11 does offset the data section to the next page boundary (2 octal) when the -n option is included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Igor Kozhukhov from comment #0) > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:75: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.volatile' > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:245: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.nonvolatile' > what is replacement for .volatile on GAS? There is no direct replacement. If I have read the Sparc Assembly Language Reference Manual correctly, then these pseudo ops allow (.nonvolatile) and disallow (.volatile) assembly time optimizations. The only optimization that GAS performs for the Sparc architecture is jump/call relaxation, and this is controlled via a command line option, not a pseudo-op. You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the command line and see if this works. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 --- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > (In reply to Igor Kozhukhov from comment #0) > > > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:75: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.volatile' > > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:245: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.nonvolatile' > > > what is replacement for .volatile on GAS? > > There is no direct replacement. If I have read the Sparc Assembly Language > Reference Manual correctly, then these pseudo ops allow (.nonvolatile) and > disallow (.volatile) assembly time optimizations. The only optimization > that GAS performs for the Sparc architecture is jump/call relaxation, and > this is controlled via a command line option, not a pseudo-op. > > You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the > command line and see if this works. > > Cheers > Nick your solution doesn't work. GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax we can use -no-relax - but it is not fixed my problem and i can see: /usr/bin/ld -32 -o libc.so.1 -G -hlibc.so.1 -ztext -zdefs -Bdirect -M/ws/builds/igork/dg-54/usr/src/lib/libc/port/mapfile-vers -M/ws/builds/igork/dg-54/usr/src/common/mapfiles/common/map.pagealign -z rtldinfo=tls_rtldinfo -znow -e __rtboot -zdtrace=dtrace_data pics/crti.o pics/stret1.opics/stret2.o pics/stret4.o pics/_ftou.opics/cerror.o pics/cerror64.o pics/hwmuldiv.o pics/_rtbootld.o pics/_D_cplx_div.o pics/_D_cplx_div_ix.o pics/_D_cplx_div_rx.o pics/_D_cplx_mul.o pics/_F_cplx_div.o pics/_F_cplx_div_ix.o pics/_F_cplx_div_rx.o pics/_F_cplx_mul.o pics/_Q_add.o pics/_Q_cmp.o pics/_Q_cmpe.o pics/_Q_cplx_div.o pics/_Q_cplx_div_ix.o pics/_Q_cplx_div_rx.o pics/_Q_cplx_lr_div.o pics/_Q_cplx_lr_div_ix.o pics/_Q_cplx_lr_div_rx.opics/_Q_cplx_lr_mul.o pics/_Q_cplx_mul.o pics/_Q_div.o pics/_Q_dtoq.o pics/_Q_fcc.o pics/_Q_itoq.o pics/_Q_lltoq.o pics/_Q_mul.o pics/_Q_neg.o pics/_Q_qtod.o pics/_Q_qtoi.o pics/_Q_qtos.o pics/_Q_qtou.o pics/_Q_scl.o pics/_Q_set_except.opics/_Q_sqrt.o pics/_Q_stoq.o pics/_Q_sub.o pics/_Q_ulltoq.opics/_Q_utoq.o pics/__quad_mag.o pics/_Q_get_rp_rd.o pics/fpgetmask.opics/fpgetrnd.o pics/fpgetsticky.o pics/fpsetmask.opics/fpsetrnd.o pics/fpsetsticky.o pics/__quad.opics/atomic.o pics/chacha.o pics/xattr_common.o pics/bcmp.o pics/bcopy.opics/bzero.o pics/bsearch.o pics/memccpy.o pics/qsort.o pics/strtol.o pics/strtoul.o pics/strtoll.o pics/strtoull.o pics/dtrace_data.o pics/_getsp.o pics/_xregs_clrptr.opics/abs.o pics/alloca.o pics/arc4random.o pics/arc4random_uniform.o pics/ascii_strcasecmp.o pics/byteorder.opics/cuexit.o pics/ecvt.o pics/endian.o pics/errlst.o pics/getctxt.o pics/ladd.o pics/lmul.o pics/lock.o pics/lshiftl.o pics/lsign.o pics/lsub.o pics/makectxt.o pics/memchr.o pics/memcmp.o pics/new_list.o pics/setjmp.o pics/siginfolst.o pics/siglongjmp.o pics/smt_pause.opics/sparc_data.o pics/strchr.o pics/strcmp.o pics/strlcpy.o pics/strncmp.o pics/strncpy.o pics/strnlen.o pics/swapctxt.o pics/sync_instruction_memory.o pics/memcpy.o pics/memset.o pics/memmove.opics/strlen.o pics/strcpy.o pics/__flt_decim.o pics/__flt_rounds.o pics/__tbl_10_b.o pics/__tbl_10_h.o pics/__tbl_10_s.o pics/__tbl_2_b.o pics/__tbl_2_h.opics/__tbl_2_s.o pics/__tbl_fdq.opics/__tbl_tens.o pics/__x_power.opics/_base_sup.opics/aconvert.o pics/decimal_bin.o pics/double_decim.o pics/econvert.o pics/fconvert.o pics/file_decim.o pics/finite.o pics/fp_data.o pics/func_decim.o pics/gconvert.o pi
Re: [Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC
Hi Igor, >> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the > your solution doesn't work. > GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax > we can use -no-relax Oops - I had too many dashes, sorry about that. > - but it is not fixed my problem Well, it does fix the assembler problem you had. Now you have a linker/ source file problem. > and i can see: > Text relocation remains referenced > against symbol offset in file > _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 0x214 pics/_rtbootld.o > _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 0x194 pics/door.o > ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections Well the linker error messages seems pretty clear. My guess would be that _rtbootld.o and door.o come from assembler source files, or else C/C++ source files containing inline assembler directives, and that they are creating special sections of their own. Can you modify the sources files ? If so you could use "objdump -r pics/" to find out which sections have these problematic relocations, and then you could edit the sources to add the writeable attribute to the section declarations. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Igor, >> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the > your solution doesn't work. > GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax > we can use -no-relax Oops - I had too many dashes, sorry about that. > - but it is not fixed my problem Well, it does fix the assembler problem you had. Now you have a linker/ source file problem. > and i can see: > Text relocation remains referenced > against symbol offset in file > _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 0x214 pics/_rtbootld.o > _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 0x194 pics/door.o > ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections Well the linker error messages seems pretty clear. My guess would be that _rtbootld.o and door.o come from assembler source files, or else C/C++ source files containing inline assembler directives, and that they are creating special sections of their own. Can you modify the sources files ? If so you could use "objdump -r pics/" to find out which sections have these problematic relocations, and then you could edit the sources to add the writeable attribute to the section declarations. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20693] kernel build error on ppc64le
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20693 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It happens on all archs with an empty archive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20699] New: [libopcodes][x86] Decodes invalid 32-bit address for a 64-bit MPX instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20699 Bug ID: 20699 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Decodes invalid 32-bit address for a 64-bit MPX instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: njholcomb at wi dot rr.com Target Milestone: --- Libopcodes produces invalid 32-bit address for a 64-bit MPX instruction. Output: addr32 bndstx %bnd0, -0x76a5963e(%eip) # 0x895a69cb Bytes: 67 41 0f 1b 05 c2 69 5a 89 This instruction should be shown as invalid because 64-bit MPX instructions cannot act on 32-bit addresses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19660] [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 --- Comment #6 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- The fact that the rep prefixes cannot be used with these opcodes is not the same as machine dependencies. This instruction will be invalid everywhere, so it should be decoded as invalid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20700] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20700 Bug ID: 20700 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The xbegin instruction should only works with 16-bit or 32-bit offsets, so the 'q' suffix is invalid. Bytes: c7 f8 80 aa 33 90 Output: xbeginq 0x9033aa86 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20701] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for phaddw instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20701 Bug ID: 20701 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for phaddw instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following instruction (output of objdump) could not be assembled using GAS due to the error: Bytes: 0f 7a 47 22 Instruction: phaddwq (%rdx), %xmm4 ERROR: invalid instruction suffix for `phaddw' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20702] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret instruction due to data16 prefix
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20702 Bug ID: 20702 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret instruction due to data16 prefix Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following instruction (output of objdump) could not be assembled using GAS due to the error: Bytes: 66 0f 07 Instruction: sysretw ERROR: invalid instruction suffix for `sysret' I would guess that this has to do with the data16 prefix on the sysret. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20703] New: [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703 Bug ID: 20703 Summary: [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following instruction produced by objdump cannot be assembled by GAS due to an error: Bytes: 62 c1 95 00 f4 41 42 Instruction: vpmuludq 0x420(%r9), %xmm29, %xmm16 ERROR: invalid register operand for `vpmuludq' This might be a limitation on the part of gas. Checking other decoders like XED and LLVM, the instruction appears to be valid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20704] New: [libopcodes][x86]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 Bug ID: 20704 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20704] [libopcodes][x86] Decodes in valid PTEST instruction as opcode with no operands.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 nholcomb at wisc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[libopcodes][x86] |[libopcodes][x86] Decodes ||in valid PTEST instruction ||as opcode with no operands. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20704] [libopcodes][x86] Decodes in valid PTEST instruction as opcode with no operands.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 --- Comment #1 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- The following bytes produce only the opcode when decoded. The bytes themselves do not appear to be a valid instruction. Bytes: 0f 7a 20 72 Output: ptest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20705] New: [libopcodes][x86] VEX masking register name lacks formatting, cannot assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20705 Bug ID: 20705 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] VEX masking register name lacks formatting, cannot assemble Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following instruction produced by objdump cannot be assembled with gas due to an error. Bytes: c5 ac 46 f5 Instruction: kxnorw %k5, k2, %k6 ERROR: operand size mismatch for `kxnorw' By changing the second operand to "%k2" instead of "k2", the output could be reassembled. I'm not sure if this should be reported to gas as well to allow the "k2" syntax in addition to "%k2", but I think objdump should be producing valid assembly regardless. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20706] New: [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions using %ymm registers
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20706 Bug ID: 20706 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions using %ymm registers Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following are examples of objdump output XOP instructions using %ymm registers that produce invalid size errors. Bytes: 8f a9 d6 93 52 07 Instruction: vprotq 0x7(%rdx), %xmm5, %ymm2 Bytes: 8f 29 34 9b 37 Instruction: vpshaq %xmm9, (%rdi), %ymm14 In addition to producing errors if assembled, these bytes are interpreted as an invalid instruction by other decoders. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20709] New: [libopcodes][x86]Failure to disassemble variant encoding of test instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20709 Bug ID: 20709 Summary: [libopcodes][x86]Failure to disassemble variant encoding of test instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following are the bytes of a test instruction and the expected output. Libopcodes returns a "(bad)" instruction when disassembling these bytes. Bytes: f6 0b 50 Expected output: test $0x50,(%rbx) The other possible encoding of this instruction is f6 03 50. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20710] New: [libopcodes][x86] libopcodes produces "(bad)" decode for certain sal instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Bug ID: 20710 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] libopcodes produces "(bad)" decode for certain sal instructions Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nholcomb at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- The following bytes correspond to a 2-byte sal instruction, but libpocodes produces a 1-byte "(bad)" output instead. Bytes: d2 f0 Expected output: salb %cl, %al -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20703] [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2016-10-17 CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- [hjl@gnu-6 mbind]$ cat x.s vpmuludq 0x420(%r9),%xmm29,%xmm16 [hjl@gnu-6 mbind]$ gcc -c x.s [hjl@gnu-6 mbind]$ objdump -dwr x.o x.o: file format elf64-x86-64 Disassembly of section .text: <.text>: 0: 62 c1 95 00 f4 41 42vpmuludq 0x420(%r9),%xmm29,%xmm16 [hjl@gnu-6 mbind]$ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
