[Bug ld/20528] ld -r doesn't handle SHF_EXCLUDE section properly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20528 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Your test for this PR has introduced some new linker testsuite failures: Checking Binutils in: msp430-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: mt-elf ... LD: 3 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: nds32le-elf ... GAS: 3 LD: 16 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: i860-stardent-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: iq2000-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: pj-elf ... GAS: 1 LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: fr30-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: ft32-elf ... LD: 4 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: moxie-elf ... LD: 4 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: cr16-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: crx-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: d10v-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: d30v-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: dlx-elf ... LD: 4 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: frv-elf ... LD: 2 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Checking Binutils in: hppa-linux-gnu ... LD: 16 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528a LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr20528b Please could you fix these ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20528] ld -r doesn't handle SHF_EXCLUDE section properly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20528 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=80169c8a23d9bd3f213028e3d44239b03d0aedf7 commit 80169c8a23d9bd3f213028e3d44239b03d0aedf7 Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Sep 30 16:09:42 2016 +0930 Fix pr20528 testsuite PR ld/20528 * testsuite/ld-elf/pr20528a.d: xfail generic elf targets. Allow multiple .text sections for hppa-linux. * testsuite/ld-elf/pr20528b.d: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20528] ld -r doesn't handle SHF_EXCLUDE section properly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20528 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5) Never mind - Alan has already fixed them. :-) Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20659] New: Objcopy and change section lma failing
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20659 Bug ID: 20659 Summary: Objcopy and change section lma failing Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: neil.jones at imgtec dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9545 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9545&action=edit elf file with .MIPS.abiflags section. objcopy fails when trying to adjust the lma of the section ".MIPS.abiflags" The relevant line: --change-section-lma .MIPS.abiflags-0x8000 \ The error: BFD: hello_flash_physical.elf: warning: allocated section `.MIPS.abiflags' not in segment I thought this might be due to the period in the middle of the section name, I have tried: --change-section-lma ".MIPS.abiflags"-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma '.MIPS.abiflags'-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .MIPS\.abiflags-0x8000 \ all to no avail... $ objdump -h -w hello_flash.elf | grep MIPS 11 .MIPS.abiflags 0018 9d002cd8 9d002cd8 00012cd8 Objcopy version is 2.24.90: GNU objcopy (Codescape GNU Tools 2016.05-03 for MIPS MTI Bare Metal) 2.24.90 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. Full Command: objcopy --change-section-lma .bootflash-0xA000 \ --change-section-lma .exception_vector-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .text-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .init-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .fini-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .eh_frame-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .jcr-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .ctors-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .dtors-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .rodata-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .data-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .bss-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .startdata-0x8000 \ --change-section-lma .MIPS.abiflags-0x8000 \ pic32_hello_flash.elf pic32_hello_flash_physical.elf If I omit the change to .MIPS.abiflags all other sections LMA's get adjusted correctly. elf file is attached. Cheers, Neil. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20553] Bug in objdump when disassembling fmul, fmla and fmls
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jiong Wang : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=744ce3025e82a59c13642c57e38febd8ff531f9b commit 744ce3025e82a59c13642c57e38febd8ff531f9b Author: Jiong Wang Date: Fri Sep 30 14:16:54 2016 +0100 [AArch64] PR target/20553, fix opcode mask for SIMD multiply by element opcode/ PR target/20553 * aarch64-tbl.h (fmla, fmls, fmul, fmulx): Fix opcode mask field. gas/ * testsuite/gas/aarch64/advsimd-fp16.s (indexed_elem): New high index testcases for H and S variants. New low index testcases for D variant. * testsuite/gas/aarch64/advsimd-fp16.d: Update expected results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20553] Bug in objdump when disassembling fmul, fmla and fmls
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|2.26|2.28 (HEAD) Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Jiong Wang --- Fixed on master. Will commit to 2.26/2.27 once backporting approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20649] [MIPS] Can't find matching LO16 reloc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20649 --- Comment #3 from James Cowgill --- Thanks for the patch, it seems to work. I ran a full build of blender where the bug originally came from and it builds fine now. James -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20657] buglet in putop() in opcodes/i386-dis.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20657 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=72da393d4131836933f104abf0f605e09970f134 commit 72da393d4131836933f104abf0f605e09970f134 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Sep 30 08:54:43 2016 -0700 Don't assign alt twice PR binutils/20657 * i386-dis.c (putop): Don't assign alt twice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20657] buglet in putop() in opcodes/i386-dis.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20657 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|unspecified |2.28 (HEAD) Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.28 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20657] buglet in putop() in opcodes/i386-dis.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20657
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
The change from:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00413.html
@@ -5695,24 +5867,10 @@ putop (const char *template, int sizefla
case '{':
alt = 0;
if (intel_syntax)
- alt += 1;
- if (address_mode == mode_64bit)
- alt += 2;
- while (alt != 0)
{
while (*++p != '|')
- {
- if (*p == '}')
- {
- /* Alternative not valid. */
- strcpy (obuf, "(bad)");
- obufp = obuf + 5;
- return 1;
- }
- else if (*p == '\0')
- abort ();
- }
- alt--;
+ if (*p == '}' || *p == '\0')
+ abort ();
}
/* Fall through. */
case 'I':
should also remove "alt = 0".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20649] [MIPS] Can't find matching LO16 reloc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20649 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
