[Bug ld/20545] [avr] Incorrect offsets computed for PC relative jumps with linker relaxation and alignment directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20545 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Senthil Kumar Selvaraj : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bf1865065f64af2f32798c0327143baf99634e8d commit bf1865065f64af2f32798c0327143baf99634e8d Author: Senthil Kumar Selvaraj Date: Tue Sep 6 12:28:37 2016 +0530 Fix PR ld/20545 - relaxation bugs in avr backend Prior to the patch, addends for relocs were being adjusted even if they went beyond an alignment boundary. This is wrong - to preserve alignment constraints, the relaxation logic adds as many padding bytes at the alignment boundary as was deleted, so addends beyond the boundary should not be adjusted. avr-prop-7.s reproduces this scenario. Also, prior to this patch, the relaxation logic assumed that the addr parameter pointed to the middle of the instruction to be deleted, and that addr - count would therefore be the shrinked instruction's address. This is true when actually shrinking instructions. The alignment constraints handling logic also invokes the same logic though, with addr as the starting offset of padding bytes and with count as the number of bytes to be deleted. Calculating the shrinked insn's address as addr - count is obviously wrong in this case - that offset would point to count bytes before the last non-padded byte. avr-prop-8.s reproduces this scenario. To fix scenario 1, the patch adds an additional check to ensure reloc addends aren't adjusted if they cross a shrink boundary. The shrink boundary is either the section size or an alignment boundary. Addends pointing at an alignment boundary don't need to be adjusted, as padding would occur and keep the boundary the same. Addends pointing at section size need to be adjusted though, as no padding occurs and the section size itself would get decremented. The patch records whether padding occured (did_pad) and uses that to detect and handle this condition. To fix scenario 2, the patch adds an additional parameter (delete_shrinks_insn) to elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes to distinguish instruction bytes deletion from padding bytes deletion. It then uses that to correctly set shrinked_insn_address. bfd/ChangeLog: 2016-09-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj PR ld/20545 * elf32-avr.c (elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes): Add parameter delete_shrinks_insn. Modify computation of shrinked_insn_address. Compute shrink_boundary and adjust addend only if addend_within_shrink_boundary. (elf32_avr_relax_section): Modify calls to elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes to pass extra parameter. ld/ChangeLog: 2016-09-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj PR ld/20545 * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-7.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-7.s: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-8.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-8.s: New test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20545] [avr] Incorrect offsets computed for PC relative jumps with linker relaxation and alignment directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20545 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_27-branch branch has been updated by Senthil Kumar Selvaraj : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3cb2b3db2e1163ee324894364538e7247c37350b commit 3cb2b3db2e1163ee324894364538e7247c37350b Author: Senthil Kumar Selvaraj Date: Tue Sep 6 12:28:37 2016 +0530 Fix PR ld/20545 - relaxation bugs in avr backend Prior to the patch, addends for relocs were being adjusted even if they went beyond an alignment boundary. This is wrong - to preserve alignment constraints, the relaxation logic adds as many padding bytes at the alignment boundary as was deleted, so addends beyond the boundary should not be adjusted. avr-prop-7.s reproduces this scenario. Also, prior to this patch, the relaxation logic assumed that the addr parameter pointed to the middle of the instruction to be deleted, and that addr - count would therefore be the shrinked instruction's address. This is true when actually shrinking instructions. The alignment constraints handling logic also invokes the same logic though, with addr as the starting offset of padding bytes and with count as the number of bytes to be deleted. Calculating the shrinked insn's address as addr - count is obviously wrong in this case - that offset would point to count bytes before the last non-padded byte. avr-prop-8.s reproduces this scenario. To fix scenario 1, the patch adds an additional check to ensure reloc addends aren't adjusted if they cross a shrink boundary. The shrink boundary is either the section size or an alignment boundary. Addends pointing at an alignment boundary don't need to be adjusted, as padding would occur and keep the boundary the same. Addends pointing at section size need to be adjusted though, as no padding occurs and the section size itself would get decremented. The patch records whether padding occured (did_pad) and uses that to detect and handle this condition. To fix scenario 2, the patch adds an additional parameter (delete_shrinks_insn) to elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes to distinguish instruction bytes deletion from padding bytes deletion. It then uses that to correctly set shrinked_insn_address. bfd/ChangeLog: 2016-09-06 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj Backport from mainline 2016-09-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj PR ld/20545 * elf32-avr.c (elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes): Add parameter delete_shrinks_insn. Modify computation of shrinked_insn_address. Compute shrink_boundary and adjust addend only if addend_within_shrink_boundary. (elf32_avr_relax_section): Modify calls to elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes to pass extra parameter. ld/ChangeLog: 2016-09-06 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj Backport from mainline 2016-09-02 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj PR ld/20545 * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-7.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-7.s: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-8.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-avr/avr-prop-8.s: New test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20545] [avr] Incorrect offsets computed for PC relative jumps with linker relaxation and alignment directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20545 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- Fixed in trunk and backported to 2.27 branch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20560] New: 1888436___4111 Quickbooks Error Support Number 1888'''436""4111 Quickbooks Error Support Phone Number
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20560
Bug ID: 20560
Summary: 1888436___4111 Quickbooks Error Support Number
1888'''436""4111 Quickbooks Error Support Phone Number
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: madinakrola at mail dot com
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
1888436___4111 Quickbooks Error Support Number 1888'''436""4111 Quickbooks
Error Support Phone Number Intuit 1888-436-4111 QuickBooks™ QuickBooks Error
support numberQuickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support
Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
Quickboks Error number 1 888_436_4111 Quickboks Error Support Number
v
{
*1 888_436_4111*
"Toll Free 1 888-436*4111 for Quickbooks" related technical issues. intuit,
ERROR,Pro, enterprise, Quickbooks problems,Quickbooks account error,in all
operating system like 8 /10 /Xp /vista."
Note:- We are Quickbooks tech support service provider.We are affiliated expert
in Quickbooks.
1.> quickbooks ERROR telephone number 1 888_436_4111,,
2.> quickbooks ERROR phone number
3.> quickbooks support number 1 888-436*4111
4.> quickbooks enterprise technical support phone number
5.> quickbooks Pro customer care 1 888-436*4111 number
}
Online~System Security@+1 888-436_4111 Quickbooks ERROR Support Number phone
Quickbooks ERROR customer care phone number
1 888_436_4111 Quickbooks ERROR helpline phone number@~1 888_436_4111
QuickBooks ERROR tech Support Number Quickbooks ERROR customer service phone
number Quickbooks ERROR helpline phone number@~1 888_436_4111 QuickBooks ERROR
tech Support Number Quickbooks ERROR customer service phone number Quickbooks
ERROR helpline
Support just call @+1 888-436_4111 Quickbooks ERROR Support Number phone
Quickbooks ERROR customer support phone number @+1 888-436_4111https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20560] SPAM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20560 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Summary|1888436___4111 Quickbooks |SPAM |Error Support Number| |1888'''436""4111 Quickbooks | |Error Support Phone Number | --- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- SPAM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20550] Linking a MPX instrumented shared object fails with -pie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20550 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2016-09-06 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- It is incorrect to use size relocation on pointers since pointer size != string size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20550] Linking a MPX instrumented shared object fails with -pie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20550 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d8457a04b71cbd642a00352dce0539fe1fe22dd4 commit d8457a04b71cbd642a00352dce0539fe1fe22dd4 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Sep 6 13:34:30 2016 -0700 Resolve size relocation with copy relocation We can resolve size relocation against symbol which needs copy relocation when building executable. bfd/ PR ld/20550 * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Resolve size relocation with copy relocation when building executable. ld/ PR ld/20550 * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr20550a.s: New file. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr20550b.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp (x86_64tests): Add tests for PR ld/20550. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20550] Linking a MPX instrumented shared object fails with -pie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20550 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.28 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.28. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/20561] New: AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20561 Bug ID: 20561 Summary: AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: lp6w2eny8k at yopmail dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T tech email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T email support
[Bug gold/20561] SPAM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20561 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Summary|AT&T email support number 1 |SPAM |855 338 0710 AT&T tech | |email support number 1 855 | |338 0710 AT&T email support | |number 1 855 338 0710 AT&T | |email support number 1 855 | |338 0710| --- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- SPAM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
