[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=024425668d120663a73913352df701c8f0aea316 commit 024425668d120663a73913352df701c8f0aea316 Author: Stefan Trleman Date: Thu Aug 4 14:57:23 2016 +0100 Fix generation of relocs for 32-bit Sparc Solaris targets. PR gas/20427 * config/tc-sparc.c (cons_fix_new_sparc): Prevent the generation of 64-bit relocation types when assembling for a 32-bit Solaris target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Guys, Right - I think that it is now obvious that Stefan's patch is correct, so I have checked it in. It may be however that the patch does not go far enough - there may be other 64-bit relocs that need curtailing - but I am going to wait until there is a test that demonstrates the problem and verifies any proposed solution. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17739] Assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-sh.c:4504 on sh4 when compiling Qt5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17739 --- Comment #23 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_27-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dccb2ff522d2afba77301a046b37949356c29f88 commit dccb2ff522d2afba77301a046b37949356c29f88 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Aug 4 16:00:27 2016 +0100 Fix the generation of GOT table entries for the SH in the presence of linker garbage collection. PR ld/17739 * emulparams/shelf.sh (CHECK_RELOCS_AFTER_OPEN_INPUT): Define with ld valye 'yes'. * emulparams/shelf32.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shelf32.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shelf_nto.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shelf_nto.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shelf_vxworks.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shelf_vxworks.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf32_linux.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf32_linux.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf_linux.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf_linux.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf_nto.sh: Likewise. * emulparams/shlelf_nto.sh: Likewise. bfd * elf32-sh.c (sh_elf_gc_sweep_hook): Delete. (elf_backend_sweep_hook): Delete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17739] Assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-sh.c:4504 on sh4 when compiling Qt5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17739 --- Comment #24 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #22) > Btw, can you make sure this gets backported to binutils-2_27-branch as well? Sorry - we missed the release window. I have checked the patch in to the 2.27 branch so that when/if a point release is made the patch will be present there. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17739] Assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-sh.c:4504 on sh4 when compiling Qt5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17739 --- Comment #25 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24) > Sorry - we missed the release window. Yeah, 2.27 came quite unexpected. I knew it was announced for a while but I was expecting a much later release. > I have checked the patch in to the 2.27 branch so that when/if a point > release > is made the patch will be present there. That's still a good thing since Debian usually adds the latest branch updates to the releases of gcc and binutils, so hopefully this will be available soon. Thanks, Adrian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20436] New: Testsuite ld-plugin/lto.exp fails
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20436 Bug ID: 20436 Summary: Testsuite ld-plugin/lto.exp fails Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jb999 at gmx dot de Target Milestone: --- The testsuite of 2.27 fails (2.26.1 was OK): Running /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp ... ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-1a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-1b.c: compilation failed FAIL: LTO 1 FAIL: LTO 1 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-2.c: compilation failed FAIL: LTO 2 FAIL: LTO 2 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-3a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-3b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-3.a FAIL: Build liblto-3.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-5a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-5b.c: compilation failed FAIL: LTO 6 FAIL: LTO 6 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12365a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12365b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12365c.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-9.cc: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-11a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-11b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-12c.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-12.a FAIL: Build liblto-12.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-12a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-12b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-13a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-13b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-14a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-14b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-14c.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-14.a FAIL: Build liblto-14.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-15a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-15b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-15.a FAIL: Build liblto-15.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12696-1.cc: compilation failed FAIL: PR ld/12696 FAIL: PR ld/12696 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12758b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build libpr12758.a FAIL: Build libpr12758.a FAIL: PR ld/12758 FAIL: PR ld/12758 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12760b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build libpr12760.a FAIL: Build libpr12760.a FAIL: PR ld/12760 FAIL: PR ld/12760 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr13183a.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build libpr13183.a FAIL: Build libpr13183.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr13183b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr13201.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr13287.cc: compilation failed FAIL: PR ld/13287 FAIL: PR ld/13287 ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr15323a.c: compilation failed FAIL: PR ld/15323 (2) FAIL: PR ld/15323 (2) ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr16846a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr16846b.c: compilation failed FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(1) FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(1) FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(2) FAIL: PR ld/pr16846(2) ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr19317.c: compilation failed FAIL: PR ld/19317 (1) FAIL: PR ld/19317 (1) ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr20276b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr20267b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build libpr20267a.a FAIL: Build libpr20267a.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr20267b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build libpr20267b.a FAIL: Build libpr20267b.a ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12942a.cc: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/pr12942c.cc: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-7a.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-7b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-7c.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-8b.c: compilation failed ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-17a.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-17a.so FAIL: Build liblto-17a.so ERROR: /tmp/binutils-2.27/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto-17b.c: compilation failed FAIL: Build liblto-17b.s
