[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- It used to be that you were much better off *not* having the big-endian linker targets available by default, so that makefiles that wrongly passed -melf64ppc caused powerpc64le-linux-ld to give an obvious error relating to its command line rather than something more obscure. I suppose most of those package problems have been fixed nowadays, so perhaps making the big-endian targets available isn't such a bad thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 --- Comment #12 from Mike Frysinger --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #11) i can't speak too much to ppc-specific codebases, but i think the wider ecosystem has gotten sane now (especially with libtool handling a lot now). Leno has been going through much of Gentoo to track down the missing pieces, so hopefully we should be able to shake those cases out too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/20000] New: src/sim/rx/fpu.c:436: possible typo ?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Bug ID: 2 Summary: src/sim/rx/fpu.c:436: possible typo ? Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- [src/sim/rx/fpu.c:436]: (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches previous condition at line 434. Source code is if (a->type == FP_SNAN) *c = a->orig_value | 0x0040; else if (a->type == FP_SNAN) *c = b->orig_value | 0x0040; else *c = 0x7fc0; Maybe better code if (a->type == FP_SNAN) *c = a->orig_value | 0x0040; else if (b->type == FP_SNAN) *c = b->orig_value | 0x0040; else *c = 0x7fc0; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20006] New: Linking gcc and gold with ld.bfd with compressed debug sections fails on final close
libgold.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a -ldl -lz -ldl incremental-dump: final close failed: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:806: recipe for target 'incremental-dump' failed make[4]: *** [incremental-dump] Error 1 make[4]: Target 'all-am' not remade because of errors. make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/d/binutils/gold' Makefile:940: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/d/binutils/gold' Makefile:691: recipe for target 'all' failed make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/d/binutils/gold' Makefile:6080: recipe for target 'all-gold' failed make[1]: *** [all-gold] Error 2 make[2]: Entering directory '/home/d/binutils/gprof' For all compilations I use gcc 7.0.0 20160426 (a9ad7ef) and export CFLAGS="-pipe -O3" CXXFLAGS="-pipe -O3" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,relro,-O1" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/20006] Linking gcc and gold with ld.bfd with compressed debug sections fails on final close
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20006 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 --- Comment #13 from Leno Hou --- Hi Alan, >> makefiles that wrongly passed -melf64ppc caused powerpc64le-linux-ld to give >> an >>obvious error relating to its command line rather than something more >> obscure. aclocal -> automake -> libtoolize -> autoconf -> configure -> Makefile During this work flow, we've patched libtool.m4 as below which is make sure generate correct Makefile and passed correct $LD="ld -m elf64lppc' to powerpc64le-linux-ld >> I suppose most of those package problems have been fixed nowadays, so >> perhaps making the big-endian targets available isn't such a bad thing. So I must make sure that all packages with -melf64ppc was updated by elibtoolize or eautoreconf. Then we'll enable big-endian targets on gentoo ppc64le. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
