[Bug binutils/19938] objcopy breaks sh_link and sh_info of SHT_SUNW_LDYNSYM and SHT_SUNW_symsort sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9178|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9181 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9181&action=edit Revised patch Hi Guys, Right - here is a revised patch. Could someone try it out please ? This version of the patch tries to match up the sh_link and sh_info fields in special output sections with matching equivalents based upon the input sections. If it fails to find a match, it issues an error message. I have to consider this patch to only be an interim solution however as there appears to be another bug: The SHF_STRINGS flag bit used by, for example, the .dynstr section, does not appear to be copied correctly. This is for a standard ELF section, which I would have expected to be copied correctly. So more investigation is needed in order to find out what is going on. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19938] objcopy breaks sh_link and sh_info of SHT_SUNW_LDYNSYM and SHT_SUNW_symsort sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9182 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9182&action=edit Update readelf with Solaris specific information Hi Guys, This is a supplimental patch that I intend to check in at some point. It updates readelf so that it can recognise Solaris specific values in the hello executable. There are other values specific to Solaris that this patch does not address, but I would prefer to wait for a test binary that uses them before adding the necessary code. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19939] Incorrect error message for undefined symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19939 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.27 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for 2.27. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo --- I've ran into Bug 19935, which is caused by "Make --enable-initfini-array the default" on an sh-elf / newlib configuration. I this related? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19935] [SH] Lots of new failures in GCC testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #3) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2) > > sorry, i thought you were saying 2.26 wasn't working. i don't think there's > any significant differences between 2.26 and master wrt the sim. but if you > could bisect it back, that'd be helpful. I've picked one testcase from GCC: testsuite/gcc.dg/constructor-1.c 26e3a0c9ba4a8376fdf9f898637919d144d8b1d8 is the first bad commit commit 26e3a0c9ba4a8376fdf9f898637919d144d8b1d8 Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Dec 2 19:23:41 2015 +1030 Make --enable-initfini-array the default * configure.ac (--enable-initfini-array): Remove run test. Default to "yes". Change help string to --disable-initfini-array. * configure: Regenerate. This makes sense, since most of the new failures are C++ related tests. Bug 15025 looks somehow related ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
GNU Assembler (ARMv8 - Raspberry Pi 3)
While not a bug report, I have been told to write this site for information and help. Sorry if it's inappropriate. The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-bit ARMv8 processor (WiFi, Bluetooth, C, Python, Mathematica, FreeOffice, etc. all free with the still US$35 board!) and I'm using the GNU assembler (32-bit) successfully. I am writing a book on assembler and would now like to get a 64-bit assembler from GNU. Is there one available? If not yet, when might it appear? Of course I also want a new C compiler to take advantage of the processor. Again, is there one yet? Thanks for any information you can give me. Bill Pervin (per...@utdallas.edu) Dr. William J. Pervin Professor Emeritus of Mathematics, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Computer Science University of Texas at Dallas ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19935] [SH] Lots of new failures in GCC testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 Mike Frysinger changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/15025] --enable-initfini-array creates .init_array where no input has one
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025 Mike Frysinger changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: GNU Assembler (ARMv8 - Raspberry Pi 3)
On 12 Apr 2016 13:55, Pervin, William wrote: > While not a bug report, I have been told to write this site for information > and help. Sorry if it's inappropriate. you want binut...@sourceware.org for general discussion https://sourceware.org/binutils/ > The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-bit ARMv8 processor (WiFi, Bluetooth, C, > Python, Mathematica, FreeOffice, etc. all free > with the still US$35 board!) and I'm using the GNU assembler (32-bit) > successfully. I am writing a book on assembler and > would now like to get a 64-bit assembler from GNU. Is there one available? If > not yet, when might it appear? Of course I > also want a new C compiler to take advantage of the processor. Again, is > there one yet? the GNU toolchain has supported 64-bit ARM for a while now. use the target aarch64-* instead of something like armv7a-* to get one. -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19935] [SH] Lots of new failures in GCC testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Does ELF/sh target support the current gABI, like DT_INIT? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19935] [SH] --enable-initfini-array causes failures in GCC testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com Summary|[SH] Lots of new failures |[SH] |in GCC testsuite|--enable-initfini-array ||causes failures in GCC ||testsuite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19935] [SH] --enable-initfini-array causes failures in GCC testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- We could of course change the default back to --disable-initfini-array for SH, but that would just be hiding the real problem. Please verify that linking one of the failing testcases with -Wl,--disable-initfini-array produces a working binary with a new linker. Assuming that is the case, please attach both working and failing binaries. There may be something obvious to see. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #6 from D337z --- Umm...there is no ld.log file in ld. O_o -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #7 from D337z --- Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that I had to run make check again. I'll upload a few files for what failed. Gold failed 2 tests, so I'll upload the log files for that as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #8 from D337z --- Created attachment 9186 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9186&action=edit ld.log file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #9 from D337z --- Created attachment 9187 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9187&action=edit Gold testsuite.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to D337z from comment #8) > Created attachment 9186 [details] > ld.log file I think most of them are dup of PR 19774. Please try master branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 D337z changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9186|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from D337z --- Created attachment 9188 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9188&action=edit ld.log file from master Problem persists -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #12 from D337z --- gold passes all four tests, gdb now failing several tests (mostly in ada) and doesn't create a log file that I can find. Compiling requires in-branch isl to work as it can't locate installed versions. If you like, I can create separate bug reports for these issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19900] runtest fails after make
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900 --- Comment #13 from D337z --- (In reply to D337z from comment #12) > gold passes all four tests, gdb now failing several tests (mostly in ada) > and doesn't create a log file that I can find. Compiling requires in-branch > isl to work as it can't locate installed versions. > If you like, I can create separate bug reports for these issues. The most I could really do other than make check-gdb > gdb.log === gdb Summary === # of expected passes35664 # of unexpected failures598 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 70 # of unknown successes 1 # of known failures 68 # of unresolved testcases 4 # of untested testcases 31 # of unsupported tests 73 It's broked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
