[Bug gas/19498] New: Invalid "symbol definition loop encountered at `callmealias.lto_priv.1'" diagnostics for weakrefs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19498 Bug ID: 19498 Summary: Invalid "symbol definition loop encountered at `callmealias.lto_priv.1'" diagnostics for weakrefs Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code: .text .globl callmefirst .type callmefirst, @function callmefirst: .globl callmesecond .type callmesecond, @function callmesecond: jmp callmealias.lto_priv.0 .weakrefcallmealias.lto_priv.0,callmesecond makes gas to complain about loop in aliases while there is none. See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] New: as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 Bug ID: 19499 Summary: as ignores .file directives when generating error messages Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ruperts at broadcom dot com Target Milestone: --- The documentation at https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Errors.html says: If a logical file name has been given (see .file) it is used for the filename, otherwise the name of the current input file is used. If a logical line number was given (see .line) then it is used to calculate the number printed, otherwise the actual line in the current source file is printed. However, consider this transcript: ~ $ as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.25.90.20160101 Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or later. This program has absolutely no warranty. This assembler was configured for a target of `x86_64-linux-gnu'. ~ $ cat test.s .file 1 "test.c" some_nonsense_insn 1 2 3 ~ $ as test.s -o test.o test.s: Assembler messages: test.s:2: Error: no such instruction: `some_nonsense_insn 1 2 3' I would expect the last two lines to begin with "test.c" rather than "test.s". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Rupert, It would appear that it is necessary to define both the logical file name *and* the logical line number in order for the error message to use the specified values: $ cat test2.s .file "test.c" .line 10 some_nonesense_insn 1 2 3 $ as test2.s test.c: Assembler messages: test.c:11: Error: no such instruction: `some_nonsense_insn 1 2 3' Also it is necessary to use the non-DAWRF version of the .line pseudo-op in order for this feature to work: $ cat test3.s .file 5 "test.c" .line 10 some_nonesense_insn 1 2 3 $ as test3.s test3.s: Assembler messages: test3.s:3: Error: no such instruction: `some_nonsense_insn 1 2 3' I am not sure however as to whether the assembler or the documentation is wrong. The obvious answer would be that the assembler is wrong, since it has been provided with file and line number information. But the counter to that is that in most cases using the source file/line number information in the error message would be very unhelpful, since it is not (usually) the source code that contains the bug - it is the assembler output that has been generated from the source file. Hence providing an assembler source/line number combination in an error message is actually quite helpful. I am leaning towards updating the documentation. How do you feel about this ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19498] Invalid "symbol definition loop encountered at `callmealias.lto_priv.1'" diagnostics for weakrefs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19498 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #0) > .weakrefcallmealias.lto_priv.0,callmesecond callmesecond should be undefined with .weakref. You should use .setcallmealias.lto_priv.0,callmesecond .weakcallmealias.lto_priv.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 --- Comment #2 from Rupert Swarbrick (Broadcom) --- Brilliant! I hadn't thought to pass in line information too. I don't have strong feelings about what should be updated: probably I agree that the best thing is to update the documentation to match the current state of affairs. Either way, it's good to have the possibility of getting the assembler to refer to a named file. I'm working on an assembly-language pre-processor, so would like error messages to refer to the user's code, rather than /tmp/some-mangled-version.s ... Thanks for the quick response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19459] [ARM] test failures with arm-wince-pe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19459 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christophe, It turns out that the ARM version of dlltool does not support the --leading-underscore option. So I have fixed the tests to allow for this. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19458] [ARM] test failures with arm-wince-pe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19458 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christophe, I have applied a patch to skip these tests. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19457] [ARM] test failures with arm-wince-pe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19457 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fdbd3e95ee4b35c9b3f61cab71f339513ca326dc commit fdbd3e95ee4b35c9b3f61cab71f339513ca326dc Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Jan 20 15:41:06 2016 + Fix linker testsuite failures for arm-pe targets. PR 19457 * testsuite/ld-scripts/script.exp (extract_symbol_test): Stop test early for PE based targets. * testsuite/ld-scripts/align.t: Use 0x1000 as VMA alignment. * testsuite/ld-pe/tlssec32.d: Allow for relocatable output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19457] [ARM] test failures with arm-wince-pe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19457 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christophe, I have checked in a patch which should fix these failures. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=72e0b2547dfcc466751ee4c5daf113d533140f66 commit 72e0b2547dfcc466751ee4c5daf113d533140f66 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Jan 20 16:21:34 2016 + Upda the documentation on assembler error message generation. PR 19499 * doc/as.texinfo (Errors): Correct documentation describing the interaction of .file and .line with warning and error messages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Rupert, OK - I have updated the documentation to correctly describe the current state of affairs. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19499] as ignores .file directives when generating error messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19499 --- Comment #5 from Rupert Swarbrick (Broadcom) --- Looks good to me. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19456] [ARM] test failures with arm-vxworks
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19456 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=74b92a5c75901b103fb58f5e645c86a1c4ccb618 commit 74b92a5c75901b103fb58f5e645c86a1c4ccb618 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Jan 20 17:02:42 2016 + Fix unexpected failures in GAS testsuite for ARM VxWorks target. PR 19456 * testsuite/gas/arm/weakdef-1.d: Skip for VxWorks. * testsuite/gas/arm/blx-bl-convert.d * testsuite/gas/arm/plt-1.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/arm/reloc-bad.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/arm/thumb-w-good.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/arm/thumb2_pool.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/arm/ldconst.d: Adjust so that it works with VxWorks * testsuite/gas/arm/tls_vxworks.d: Update expected output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/19456] [ARM] test failures with arm-vxworks
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19456 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christophe, I have checked in a patch to fix these. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19501] New: binutils should be updated to support additional target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501 Bug ID: 19501 Summary: binutils should be updated to support additional target Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ann.lai at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- This is an enhancement. The existing objcopy should be updated to support additional targets. Current supporting targets: /usr/gnu/bin/objcopy: supported targets: elf32-i386-sol2 coff-i386 elf64-x86-64-sol2 elf64-l1om elf64-k1om elf64-little elf64-big elf32-little elf32-big plugin srec symbolsrec verilog tekhex binary ihex New list of targets: objcopy: supported targets: elf32-i386-sol2 coff-i386 elf64-x86-64-sol2 elf64-l1om elf64-k1om pe-i386 pe-x86-64 pei-x86-64 pei-i386 elf64-little elf64-big elf32-little elf32-big plugin srec symbolsrec verilog tekhex binary ihex Proposed change: --- bfd/config.bfd 2015-12-21 14:44:52.467611718 -0800 +++ bfd/config.bfd 2015-12-21 14:48:28.692616591 -0800 @@ -526,13 +526,13 @@ i[3-7]86-*-solaris2*) targ_defvec=i386_elf32_sol2_vec targ_selvecs="i386_coff_vec" -targ64_selvecs="x86_64_elf64_sol2_vec l1om_elf64_vec k1om_elf64_vec" +targ64_selvecs="x86_64_elf64_sol2_vec l1om_elf64_vec k1om_elf64_vec i386_pe_vec x86_64_pe_vec x86_64_pei_vec i386_pei_vec" want64=true ;; #ifdef BFD64 x86_64-*-solaris2*) targ_defvec=i386_elf32_sol2_vec -targ_selvecs="x86_64_elf64_sol2_vec l1om_elf64_vec k1om_elf64_vec i386_coff_vec" +targ_selvecs="x86_64_elf64_sol2_vec l1om_elf64_vec k1om_elf64_vec i386_coff_vec i386_pe_vec x86_64_pe_vec x86_64_pei_vec i386_pei_vec" want64=true ;; #endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19501] binutils should be updated to support additional target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Please try binutils 2.26 branch. I think it has been fixed by commit d00c2bc9c0567b6eb7d64ac4dee27b8a8dc2cedb Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Oct 4 07:42:43 2015 -0700 Enable IAMCU and PEI for Solaris2/x86 bfd/ * config.bfd (targ_selvecs, targ64_selvecs): Add iamcu_elf32_vec, i386_pei_vec and x86_64_pei_vec for Solaris2/x86. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19501] binutils should be updated to support additional target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
