Re: [Bug binutils/19421] New: Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el
Hi Alan, Have you seen this bug report: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 Summary: Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el Quite a few symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el are dropped after upgrading to binutils 2.25. This in turn completely breaks module loading on ppc64el systems, per this Debian bug report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808246 It seems that the cause of this was the patch for PR 4317: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4317 Perhaps we need to allow some targets to require that undefined locals are preserved ? Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19421] [2.26 Regression] Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alan, Have you seen this bug report: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421 > Summary: Missing weak symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el > Quite a few symbols in kernel modules on ppc64el are dropped after upgrading > to > binutils 2.25. This in turn completely breaks module loading on ppc64el > systems, per this Debian bug report: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808246 It seems that the cause of this was the patch for PR 4317: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4317 Perhaps we need to allow some targets to require that undefined locals are preserved ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19368] [2.26/2.27 regression] IFUNC support not working on arm-linux-gnueabi*
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19368 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jiong Wang : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=109575d7ebac21a0eb67980001ecd4173d696f88 commit 109575d7ebac21a0eb67980001ecd4173d696f88 Author: Jiong Wang Date: Fri Jan 8 09:47:24 2016 + [ARM] PR ld/19368: Add missing relocation type class for R_ARM_IRELATIVE 2016-01-08 Richard Sandiford Jiong Wang PR ld/19368 bfd/ * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_reloc_type_class): Map R_ARM_IRELATIVE to reloc_class_ifunc. ld/ * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-3.rd: Update expected result. * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-4.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-9.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-10.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-12.rd: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-arm/ifunc-13.rd: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19435] objdump receives SIGABRT when disassembling Mach O binary on OS X
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ian, Unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this problem using an x86_64 Linux hosted cross compiler. Possibly the problem is Mach-O specific. Please could you check to see if the problem is still present with the current mainline binutils development sources. If the problem does still exist, please you try to narrow down where the bug is occurring. Ie where is the free() happening ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19368] [2.26/2.27 regression] IFUNC support not working on arm-linux-gnueabi*
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19368 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jiong Wang --- fixed on master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19435] objdump receives SIGABRT when disassembling Mach O binary on OS X
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435 --- Comment #4 from Ian Kronquist --- Nick, The problem is mach-o specific. The problem persists under mainline binutils built on OS X. I attached a problematic mach-o which you could try to disassemble as described previously. The problem is in the function bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup, probably in the only invocation of free in that function. My guess is that some of the bfd metadata is messed up and never properly allocated, but I'm not sure. I'll have to do some more investigation. I'm willing to try to help fix the bug and submit a patch if I can get some guidance. Thanks, Ian On Jan 8, 2016 1:53 AM, "nickc at redhat dot com" < sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435 > > Nick Clifton changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > > CC||nickc at redhat dot com > > --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi Ian, > > Unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this problem using an x86_64 Linux > hosted cross compiler. Possibly the problem is Mach-O specific. > > Please could you check to see if the problem is still present with the > current mainline binutils development sources. > > If the problem does still exist, please you try to narrow down where > the bug > is occurring. Ie where is the free() happening ? > > Cheers > Nick > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/13050] move.b (2,a0,d0.l),1(%a1) should fail for all ColdFire targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13050 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Andreas Schwab : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=83c3256ef5afe10625fd55dda2df5fc56b9b7393 commit 83c3256ef5afe10625fd55dda2df5fc56b9b7393 Author: Andreas Schwab Date: Fri Jan 8 11:38:00 2016 +0100 m68k: fix constraints of move.[bw] for ISA_B/C For ISA_B/C only the combination #,d(An) is allowed in addition to the ISA_A combinations for move.b and move.w (and pc-relative is never allowed as destination). opcodes/ PR gas/13050 * m68k-opc.c (moveb, movew): For ISA_B/C only allow #,d(An) in addition to ISA_A. gas/ PR gas/13050 * testsuite/gas/m68k/all.exp: Add tests p13050-1 and p13050-2. * testsuite/gas/m68k/p13050-1.s: New file. * testsuite/gas/m68k/p13050-2.d: New file. * testsuite/gas/m68k/p13050-2.s: New file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/13050] move.b (2,a0,d0.l),1(%a1) should fail for all ColdFire targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13050 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.27 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Fixed for 2.27. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
