[Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW

2015-12-12 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11539

Daniel Starke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||daniel.f.starke at freenet dot 
de

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/19359] [2.26/2.27 regression] gas fails with Error: junk at end of line: `8' on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2015-12-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b817670b52b7414d592cbfd96fd77cf725a33413

commit b817670b52b7414d592cbfd96fd77cf725a33413
Author: Alan Modra 
Date:   Sat Dec 12 17:26:33 2015 +1030

Enable 2 operand form of powerpc mfcr with -many

This is a workaround for a gcc bug.

PR 19359
* ppc-opc.c (insert_fxm): Remove "ignored" from error message.
(powerpc_opcodes): Remove single-operand mfcr.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/19359] [2.26/2.27 regression] gas fails with Error: junk at end of line: `8' on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2015-12-12 Thread bergner at vnet dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359

Peter Bergner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bergner at vnet dot ibm.com

--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner  ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> I think this is possible to fix in the assembler, but you've also uncovered
> a gcc bug here.  gcc ought to be passing -mpower8 to gas when given
> -mcpu=powerpc64le.

I would say that -mcpu=powerpc64le should be treated exactly like -mcpu=power8,
so not only should it pass -mpower8 to the assembler, it should set the same
TARGET_* flags within gcc itself.  Alan, can you tell whether that is happening
or not?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/19356] unwind stack failed if stack including syscall on armv7

2015-12-12 Thread guonic at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19356

Guonic  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|libc|ld
Product|glibc   |binutils

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils