[Bug ld/19319] New: Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 Bug ID: 19319 Summary: Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297 Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, ld.bfd is broken on GNU/Hurd since Debian version 20151028-1. Compared to the previous version, 20151021-1. From debian/changelog: * Snapshot, taken from the trunk 20151028. - Fix PR ld/19171 (LP: #1510067), PR ld/19175 (LP: #1510270). Test case is a patched corosync package during linking: (cd exec; gcc -g -O2 -fuse-ld=bfd -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIC -DPIC -fPIE -O3 -ggdb3 -Wall -Wshadow -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-align -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat=2 -Wformat-security -Wformat-nonliteral -Wno-long-long -Wno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/include -fPIE -pie -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,defs -fPIC -DPIC -pie -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/corosync corosync-vsf_ykd.o corosync-coroparse.o corosync-vsf_quorum.o corosync-sync.o corosync-logsys.o corosync-cfg.o corosync-cmap.o corosync-cpg.o corosync-pload.o corosync-votequorum.o corosync-util.o corosync-schedwrk.o corosync-main.o corosync-apidef.o corosync-quorum.o corosync-icmap.o corosync-timer.o corosync-ipc_glue.o corosync-service.o corosync-logconfig.o corosync-totemconfig.o ./.libs/libtotem_pg.so -lnss3 -lnssutil3 -lsmime3 -lssl3 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 ../common_lib/.libs/libcorosync_common.so -lqb -ldl -lrt -lpthread) /usr/bin/ld.bfd: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297 Using -fuse-ld=gold linking is fine. Both test cases in 19171 and 19175 links fine too. Shall I attach a tar file with the objective files for the link command above? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #0) > Shall I attach a tar file with the objective files for the link command > above? Yes, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #2 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8819 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8819&action=edit Object files tar.gz file of object files in the linking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #2) > Created attachment 8819 [details] > Object files > > tar.gz file of object files in the linking. I need everything, including ./.libs/libtotem_pg.so -lnss3 -lnssutil3 -lsmime3 -lssl3 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 ../common_lib/.libs/libcorosync_common.so -lqb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #0) > Hello, > > ld.bfd is broken on GNU/Hurd since Debian version 20151028-1. Compared to Since it is on GNU/Hurd, I need ALL input files for linker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #5 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8820 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8820&action=edit Dynamically linked libraries Here are the dynamically linked libraries. Some of these libraries also need the system hurd libraries as well as libc0.3 etc. Do you want me to supply them too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #5) > Created attachment 8820 [details] > Dynamically linked libraries > > Here are the dynamically linked libraries. Some of these libraries also need > the system hurd libraries as well as libc0.3 etc. Do you want me to supply > them too? I need everything linker sees as input since I don't have GNU/Hurd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #7 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8821 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8821&action=edit Additional libs Hopefully all needed libs. Please let me know if anything is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Please add "-v" to gcc. It will show additional input files passed to linker. Also I need libc.so as well as input files inside libc.so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #9 from Svante Signell --- Here is the output with gcc -v: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/lto-wrapper Target: i586-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 5.2.1-26' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-5 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --disable-libitm --disable-libsanitizer --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-hurd-i386/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-hurd-i386 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-hurd-i386 --with-arch-directory=i386 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-multiarch --with-arch=i586 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i586-gnu --host=i586-gnu --target=i586-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 5.2.1 20151125 (Debian 5.2.1-26) COMPILER_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/ LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/:/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../:/lib/i386-gnu/:/lib/:/usr/lib/i386-gnu/:/usr/lib/ COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-g' '-v' '-fuse-ld=bfd' '-O2' '-fstack-protector-strong' '-Wformat=1' '-Werror=format-security' '-D' 'PIC' '-O3' '-ggdb3' '-Wall' '-Wshadow' '-Wmissing-prototypes' '-Wmissing-declarations' '-Wstrict-prototypes' '-Wdeclaration-after-statement' '-Wpointer-arith' '-Wwrite-strings' '-Wcast-align' '-Wbad-function-cast' '-Wsuggest-attribute=format' '-Wformat=2' '-Wformat-security' '-Wformat-nonliteral' '-Wno-long-long' '-Wno-strict-aliasing' '-I' '/usr/include' '-fPIC' '-D' 'PIC' '-pie' '-o' '.libs/corosync' '-mtune=generic' '-march=i586' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/collect2 -plugin /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/liblto_plugin.so -plugin-opt=/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/lto-wrapper -plugin-opt=-fresolution=/tmp/ccTRuZxO.res -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s --sysroot=/ --build-id --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386 --hash-style=gnu -dynamic-linker /lib/ld.so -pie -fuse-ld=bfd -o .libs/corosync /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/Scrt1.o /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/crtbeginS.o -L/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu -L/usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../.. -L/lib/i386-gnu -L/usr/lib/i386-gnu -z relro -z now -z defs -z relro -z now --as-needed corosync-vsf_ykd.o corosync-coroparse.o corosync-vsf_quorum.o corosync-sync.o corosync-logsys.o corosync-cfg.o corosync-cmap.o corosync-cpg.o corosync-pload.o corosync-votequorum.o corosync-util.o corosync-schedwrk.o corosync-main.o corosync-apidef.o corosync-quorum.o corosync-icmap.o corosync-timer.o corosync-ipc_glue.o corosync-service.o corosync-logconfig.o corosync-totemconfig.o ./.libs/libtotem_pg.so -lnss3 -lnssutil3 -lsmime3 -lssl3 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 ../common_lib/.libs/libcorosync_common.so -lqb -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/crtn.o /usr/bin/ld.bfd: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status libc.so you already have in more_libs.tar.gz as: libc.so.0.3 I'll also attach crtendS.o and crtn.o separately. Anything else? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #10 from Svante Signell --- Do you need the gcc libs too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #10) > Do you need the gcc libs too? Yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #9) > libc.so you already have in more_libs.tar.gz as: libc.so.0.3 I'll also > attach crtendS.o and crtn.o separately. Anything else? Isn't libc.so a linker script? If it is, I need it and what it includes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #13 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8822 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8822&action=edit More libs and libc.so gcc libs and l/usr/lib/i386-gnu/libc.so. It is a linker script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #14 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8823 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8823&action=edit libcrt_nonshared.a Hopefully the last needed library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #14) > Created attachment 8823 [details] > libcrt_nonshared.a > > Hopefully the last needed library. I need /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/Scrt1.o /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/../../../i386-gnu/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/i586-gnu/5/crtbeginS.o -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #16 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8824 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8824&action=edit As requested Hopefully this is it. Good luck! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Svante Signell from comment #16) > Created attachment 8824 [details] > As requested > > Hopefully this is it. Good luck! I need libz.so.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19323] New: BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323 Bug ID: 19323 Summary: BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kshah at fortinet dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 8825 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8825&action=edit PoC File. The PoC file is attached with this post. Use the Objdump tool with -s parameter to open the PoC file and with output destination set as /dev/null in order to reproduce this vulnerability. I have tested it on the Kali 2.0 platform. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19323] BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323 Kushal Shah changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kshah at fortinet dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #18 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 8826 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8826&action=edit libz.so libz.so.1.2.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.25|2.26 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-6 simple]$ cat x.c
int __attribute__((section("my_section"))) a[2] = {0x1234, 0x5678};
extern int __start_my_section;
int
foo ()
{
int* ap = &__start_my_section;
return ap[0];
}
[hjl@gnu-6 simple]$ cat z.c
int __attribute__((section("my_section"))) a[2] = {0x1234, 0x5678};
extern int __start_my_section;
int
_start ()
{
int* ap = &__start_my_section;
return ap[0];
}
[hjl@gnu-6 simple]$ make
gcc -m32 -fPIC -O2 -c -o z.o z.c
gcc -m32 -fPIC -O2 -c -o x.o x.c
../ld -shared -m elf_i386 -o x.so x.o
../ld -pie -m elf_i386 -o z z.o x.so
../ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.26.51.20151201 assertion fail
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb/bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
Makefile:11: recipe for target 'z' failed
make: *** [z] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-6 simple]$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #20 from Svante Signell --- Confirmed: /usr/bin/ld.bfd -shared -m elf_i386 -o x.so x.o /usr/bin/ld.bfd -pie -m elf_i386 -o z z.o x.so /usr/bin/ld.bfd: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19319] Regression: ld.bfd: 2.25.90.20151125 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c:5297
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319 --- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ead3d5427a2df5e33316d4ad045510c1d2078c2a commit ead3d5427a2df5e33316d4ad045510c1d2078c2a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Dec 1 14:45:51 2015 -0800 Properly check symbol defined by assignment in linker script Symbol defined by a linker assignment may have type bfd_link_hash_new or bfd_link_hash_undefined. And h->def_regular is always set. elf_i386_convert_load and elf_x86_64_convert_load should check h->def_regular as well as bfd_link_hash_undefined and bfd_link_hash_new to see if a symbol is defined by a linker script. bfd/ PR ld/19319 * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_convert_load): Check h->def_regular instead of bfd_link_hash_new. * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_convert_load): Likewise. Skip relocation overflow for bfd_link_hash_undefined and bfd_link_hash_new if h->def_regular is set. ld/testsuite/ PR ld/19319 * ld-i386/i386.exp: Run pr19319 test. * ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise. * ld-i386/pr19319.dd: New file. * ld-i386/pr19319a.S: Likewise. * ld-i386/pr19319b.S: Likewise. * ld-x86-64/pr19319.dd: Likewise. * ld-x86-64/pr19319a.S: Likewise. * ld-x86-64/pr19319b.S: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19323] [FG-VD-15-113] BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323 Kushal Shah changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap |[FG-VD-15-113] |Overflow Vulnerability |BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap |Notification|Overflow Vulnerability ||Notification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19323] [FG-VD-15-113] BinUtils-2.25 Objdump Heap Overflow Vulnerability Notification
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19323 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This is not a "vulnerability". You have an object file which has been corrupted to say it has 2147483648 program headers. Trying to allocate 2147483648*32 bytes of course fails, no surprise there. objdump correctly returns an out of memory error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
