[Bug ld/19014] Typo in manpage of ld(1)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19014 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- I Have checked in a patch to fix this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alex, Is it possible for you to produce a consolidated patch that addresses all of these issues ? I am all in favour of these changes unless someone has strenuous objections - and I seriously doubt that anyone will. But it will make my life easier if I only have one patch to test instead of 5. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18998] Please enable -Wno-unknown-warning-option when compiling under Clang
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18998 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jeffrey, This is already supported. When you configure the binutils sources add --disable-werror to the configure command line. That should solve the problem. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19019] New: [SPARC64] Only registers %g[2367] can be declared using STT_REGISTER when linking against libsystemd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019 Bug ID: 19019 Summary: [SPARC64] Only registers %g[2367] can be declared using STT_REGISTER when linking against libsystemd Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de Target Milestone: --- Target: sparc*-*-* Hello! We are currently having problems on sparc64 when linking against libsystemd: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/sparc64-linux-gnu/5/../../../sparc64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so: Only registers %g[2367] can be declared using STT_REGISTER /usr/lib/gcc/sparc64-linux-gnu/5/../../../sparc64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so: error adding symbols: File format not recognized collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status This issues seems to have been introduced with one of the recent versions of binutils as systemd package versions linked with binutils_2.24.51.20140814 do not expose this bug. A full example build log of one of the packages affected can be found in [1]. Cheers, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mate-session-manager&arch=sparc64&ver=1.10.2-2&stamp=1443524013 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19005] objcopy buffer-over-read
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005 --- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c68c16371639f360d1b110eacf4b1a28ddb5cf53 commit c68c16371639f360d1b110eacf4b1a28ddb5cf53 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Sep 29 06:33:03 2015 -0700 Adjust the output section size to skip gap fills In objcopy, copy_object calls copy_section to copy contents of input section to output section. When --gap-fill= is used, objcopy extends the size of output sectios to fill gaps between output sections with gap fills. In this case, we adjust the output section size to skip gap files to avoid reading beypond the input section buffer before calling copy_section and restore the output section size after input sections have been copied. binutils/ PR binutils/19005 * objcopy.c (copy_object): Adjust the output section size to skip gap fills between sections when copying from input sections to output sections. ld/testsuite/ PR binutils/19005 * ld-elf/pr19005.d: New file. * ld-elf/pr19005.s: Likewise. * ld-elf/pr19005.t: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19005] objcopy buffer-over-read
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.26 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/19008] symbol references from notes sections result in errors with -gc-sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19008 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- It is a pilot error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19005] objcopy buffer-over-read
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Stubbs --- Looks like I'm just too late with my test results you broke the interleave feature. :-( The "interleave size" testcase in my patch demonstrates the problem. Here's the output: $ xxd tmpdir/interleaved 000: 6163 4141 4141 4141 ac..AA Those zeros are not meant to be in there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/19005] objcopy buffer-over-read
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #21) > Looks like I'm just too late with my test results you broke the > interleave feature. :-( > > The "interleave size" testcase in my patch demonstrates the problem. Here's > the output: > > $ xxd tmpdir/interleaved > 000: 6163 4141 4141 4141 ac..AA > > Those zeros are not meant to be in there. Please open a new bug report with a testcase. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
