[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Richard, > they are quite large: > > $ gls -sh pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 > > 676M pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 xz compression might make them a little bit smaller, but probably not enough. > can I copy them somewhere in particular? Sure, put them on a could file server somewhere if you like. > I could also do one at a time which is half the size. That would be fine too. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/15836] Undefined behavior in gas (causes segfault when built with clang)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15836 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Will, The offending code was removed in 2013: 2013-12-03 Tristan Gingold * config/tc-i386-intel.c (i386_intel_simplify): Avoid arithmetic overflow on pointers. Please could you check with the latest version of the binutils sources and if the problem persists, reopen this bug report. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/18646] function pointer values are still interposed with -Bsymbolic-functions on ARM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18646 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Michael, Thanks for reporting this problem. Fortunately it has already been fixed: 2015-07-25 Thomas Preud'homme * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_final_link_relocate): Use SYMBOLIC_BIND to check if a symbol should be bound symbolically. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18935] Gold assert fail when moving dot in NOLOAD section.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18935
--- Comment #1 from Johan Karlsson ---
This is not a regression from PR18847.
Seems a bit unclear what the expected behavior is.
.init_stack (NOLOAD) :
{
. = . + 0x200;
} :ph_load
With this ld.bfd creates a NOBITS SHF_ALLOC section(just like .bss).
When a new non-SHF_ALLOC output section is created the address is set to 0.
Layout::make_output_section_for_script(), which is the function that creates
the init_stack section, only tries to create sections with SHT_PROGBITS
section. This is why the assert fails when
Output_section_definition::set_section_addresses() tries to assign an address
to the section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/18946] New: testing bugzilla
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18946 Bug ID: 18946 Summary: testing bugzilla Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sowmyashree451 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- testing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
