Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation
Hi Hans-Peter, Nicely, thanks. While there's a point in keeping just one version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what you may write which doesn't work, here's the semantically corrected code, and this is what you should have written in the first place" wins, IMHO. Good. I have checked in the documentation update. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18935] New: Gold assert fail when moving dot in NOLOAD section.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18935
Bug ID: 18935
Summary: Gold assert fail when moving dot in NOLOAD section.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: johan.karlsson at enea dot com
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
ld.gold: internal error in set_address, at gold/output.h:197
The version I run is Binutils 2.25 with bug fixes for PR18846, PR18847, and
PR18746. I believe it would be reproducible on master.
Also, this might be a regression from PR18847.
Repo:
test.c:
int main() { return 0; }
script.lcf:
PHDRS
{
ph_load PT_LOAD ;
}
SECTIONS
{
.text :
{
*(.text)
} :ph_load = 0
.data ALIGN(0x2000) :
{
*(.data)
} :ph_load
.bss :
{
*(.bss)
} :ph_load
.init_stack (NOLOAD) :
{
. = . + 0x200;
} :ph_load
}
gcc -c -o test.o test.c
ld.gold -T script.lcf test.o
ld.gold: internal error in set_address, at gold/output.h:197
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18879] general protection fault in readelf (byte_get_little_endian(elfcomm.c:149))
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18879 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com Flags||security- --- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer --- It seems this is just an invalid read. readelf runs as a separate process, and the readelf process image only contains the readelf program, system libraries, and the input file, so I don't think this is a security vulnerability. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Richard, (In reply to Richard PALO from comment #10) > I can provide both libxul.so, yes please - that would definitely help. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/15835] binutils can't deal with more than one SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section (such as from Solaris or illumos link editor)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15835 --- Comment #12 from Richard PALO --- they are quite large: > $ gls -sh pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 > 676M pr15835.libxuls.tar.bz2 can I copy them somewhere in particular? I could also do one at a time which is half the size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
