[Bug gold/14342] [gold] symbol 'std::__once_callable' used as both __thread and non-__thread
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14342 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Fixed in binutils-2.24. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16773 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch, master has been updated via 5efeedf61e4fe720fd3e9a08e6c91c10abb66d42 (commit) from a73c2b56cd87f709fb9118232b19cdf516edfb10 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log - https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5efeedf61e4fe720fd3e9a08e6c91c10abb66d42 commit 5efeedf61e4fe720fd3e9a08e6c91c10abb66d42 Author: Cary Coutant Date: Fri Sep 26 13:34:27 2014 -0700 Fix handling of relocations against TLS section symbols. Gold doesn't handle relocations against the section symbol for a TLS section correctly. Instead of using the offset of the section relative to the TLS segment, it uses the address of the actual section. This patch checks for section symbols for TLS sections, and treats them the same as TLS symbols. gold/ PR gold/16773 * object.cc (Sized_relobj_file): Compute value of section symbols for TLS sections the same as TLS symbols. --- Summary of changes: gold/ChangeLog |6 ++ gold/object.cc |4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16773 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ian at airs dot com|ccoutant at google dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16773 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant --- Fixed on trunk. How did you generate test.o? Can the compiler generate the relocation against the .tdata section symbol, or did you do this through assembler? If I can make a test case for this without resorting to assembly code, it would be nice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/15370] linker script does not group sections correctly when building ppc64 Linux kernel
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15370 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ian at airs dot com|ccoutant at google dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
