[Bug ld/14926] "Not enough room for program headers" error, even though there is
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14926 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07 12:32:54 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2012-12-07 12:32:51 Modified files: ld/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: ld/testsuite/ld-elf: pr14926.d pr14926.s Log message: Add a testase for PR ld/14926 PR ld/14926 * ld-elf/pr14926.d: New file. * ld-elf/pr14926.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1634&r2=1.1635 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr14926.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr14926.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14124] Linking fails with 'address of section '.tbss' moves backward from 0xc008 to 0xc000'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 Scott Talbert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||swt at techie dot net --- Comment #2 from Scott Talbert 2012-12-07 14:59:43 UTC --- Did you ever find a solution or workaround to this? I'm running into a similar problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14124] Linking fails with 'address of section '.tbss' moves backward from 0xc008 to 0xc000'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 --- Comment #3 from Scott Talbert 2012-12-07 18:29:36 UTC --- In my case, I removed uses of __thread (Thread Local Storage) and this enabled the code to link. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12248] Linker plugin failed to preserve linking order
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:01:56 UTC --- 2.23 works correctly. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12245] BFD linker plugin generates bad executables
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245 Bug 12245 depends on bug 12248, which changed state. Bug 12248 Summary: Linker plugin failed to preserve linking order http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12248] Linker plugin failed to preserve linking order
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:04:27 UTC --- It is tracked by "LTO 1" test in ld-plugin. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12277] Linker error: "final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:05:51 UTC --- Works in 2.23. Tracked by "LTO 8" test in ld-plugin. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12314] No LTO, LD silently links to non-IR code
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12314 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:07:16 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 12a"/"LTO 12b" tests in ld-plugin. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12319] Undefined reference error with LTO and `--whole-archive'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12319 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:08:32 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 14" test. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12364] Segmentation fault in get_symbols
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12364 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:09:19 UTC --- Tracked by "LTO 6" test. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12369] Symbols present in LTO symbol table resolved as PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY and optimized out appears in final symbol table.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12369 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:10:39 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 9 symbol" test. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12439] Undefined reference error with ld.hjl
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12439 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:11:29 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 13" test. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12496] Linker fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12496 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:12:28 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 15" test. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12507] Can't build a program with -flto -nostdlib
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12507 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:13:19 UTC --- Works in 2.23 and tracked by "LTO 16a symbol"/"LTO 16b symbol" tests. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12942] Plugin not handling correctly resolution of COMDATs.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12942 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 20:16:38 UTC --- Works in 2.23. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14124] Linking fails with 'address of section '.tbss' moves backward from 0xc008 to 0xc000'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at google dot com Component|ld |gold -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14124] Linking fails with 'address of section '.tbss' moves backward from 0xc008 to 0xc000'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-linux-eabi --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2012-12-07 22:10:33 UTC --- Please try with mainline gold -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14933] New: ar & ranlib generate truncated files on 32bit platform.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14933
Bug #: 14933
Summary: ar & ranlib generate truncated files on 32bit
platform.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.23
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: al...@fairlite.co.uk
Classification: Unclassified
Hi,
Just moved from binutils 2.22 to 2.23 and ar & ranlib generated bad archives
with the message "file truncated".
Looking into the problem reveals that in archive.c we have at around line
2414
file_ptr firstreal;
file_ptr max_first_real;
max_first_real <<= 31;
then later we do
/* The archive file format only has 4 bytes to store the offset
of the member. Check to make sure that firstreal has not grown
too big. */
if (firstreal >= max_first_real)
{
bfd_set_error (bfd_error_file_truncated);
return FALSE;
}
I added a check that did this in the errored function.
printf("CHECK %d %d (%d)\n",firstreal,max_first_real,sizeof(file_ptr));
It came back with
CHECK 104 -2147483648 (4)
So, shouldn't firstreal/max_first_real be ufile_ptr's ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
