[Bug gold/14897] New: gold is installed by accident
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14897
Bug #: 14897
Summary: gold is installed by accident
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com
CC: ccout...@google.com
Classification: Unclassified
Only "--disable-ld" or "--enable-gold=default" should install
gold as default ld. However, gold/configure.ac has:
default_ld=
AC_ARG_ENABLE(ld,
[[ --enable-ld[=ARG] build ld [ARG={default,yes,no}]]],
[case "${enableval}" in
default)
default_ld=ld.bfd
;;
esac])
It will install gold as default ld for --enable-gold. As
the result, when --enable-gold is used, we get random
default ld, depending which directory, gold or ld, is
installed the last.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14897] gold is installed as default ld by accident
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14897 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gold is installed by|gold is installed as |accident|default ld by accident -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14897] gold is installed as default ld by accident
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14897 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://sourceware.org/ml/bi ||nutils/2012-11/msg00447.htm ||l --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-30 17:45:04 UTC --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-11/msg00447.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14899] New: Missing gas dependency for ld and gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14899 Bug #: 14899 Summary: Missing gas dependency for ld and gold Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified When bootstrap GCC and binutils in a combined-tree, gcc/as has RIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET="../gas/as-new" ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_TARGET="../gold/ld-new" ORIGINAL_LD_BFD_FOR_TARGET="../ld/ld-new" ORIGINAL_LD_GOLD_FOR_TARGET="../gold/ld-new" ORIGINAL_PLUGIN_LD_FOR_TARGET="../gold/ld-new" ORIGINAL_NM_FOR_TARGET="../binutils/nm-new" exeext= fast_install=yes objdir=.libs invoked=`basename "$0"` id=$invoked case "$invoked" in as) original=$ORIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET prog=as-new$exeext dir=gas ;; ld and gold must be built after gas. Otherwise, we will get /export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/tools-4.8.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -I/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -I/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -L/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/gold -I/export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/gold -I/export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/gold/../include -I/export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/gold/../elfcpp -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/tools-4.8.0/share/locale\"" -DBINDIR="\"/usr/tools-4.8.0/bin\"" -DTOOLBINDIR="\"/usr/tools-4.8.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin\"" -DTOOLLIBDIR="\"/usr/tools-4.8.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib\"" -W -Wall -Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -frandom-seed=nacl.o -g -O2 -MT nacl.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/nacl.Tpo -c -o nacl.o /export/gnu/src/tools-4.8/tools/gold/nacl.cc /export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/as: line 97: /export/build/gnu/tools-4.8/build-x86_64-linux/prev-gcc/../gas/as-new: Text file busy make[6]: *** [nacl.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14899] Missing gas dependency for ld and gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14899 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://sourceware.org/ml/bi ||nutils/2012-11/msg00449.htm ||l Version|unspecified |2.24 (HEAD) --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-30 19:51:15 UTC --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-11/msg00449.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14902] New: h8300-elf linker relaxations: symbols skipped
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14902 Bug #: 14902 Summary: h8300-elf linker relaxations: symbols skipped Product: binutils Version: 2.23 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: achille.fouilleul+binut...@gadz.org Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 6767 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6767 proposed fix (don't forget to remove the fprintfs) With binutils 2.23.1, configured with --target=h8300-elf When relaxations are applied, symbols located after the last instruction of a .text section do not get updated as they should. $ cat a.s .h8300s .text .globl _start .globl _a .globl _a_end _start: _a: sub r0,r0 jmp @_a sub r1,r1 jmp @_b sub r2,r2 _a_end: $ cat b.s .h8300s .text .globl _b _b: sub r0,r0 jmp @_a sub r1,r1 jmp @_b sub r2,r2 jmp @_a_end _b_end: $ cat Makefile AS = h8300-elf-as LD = h8300-elf-ld result.elf: a.o b.o $(LD) --relax -mh8300self $^ -o $@ .PHONY: clean clean: -rm -f *.o *.elf .s.o: $(AS) $< -o $@ Assemble and link the files above (Makefile provided for convenience), then run h8300-elf-objdump -dr result.elf: result.elf: file format elf32-h8300 Disassembly of section .text: 0100 <_a>: 100:19 00 sub.wr0,r0 102:40 fc bra.-4 (0x100) 104:19 11 sub.wr1,r1 106:40 02 bra.+2 (0x10a) 108:19 22 sub.wr2,r2 010a <_b>: 10a:19 00 sub.wr0,r0 10c:40 f2 bra.-14 (0x100) 010e <_a_end>: 10e:19 11 sub.wr1,r1 110:40 f8 bra.-8 (0x10a) 112:19 22 sub.wr2,r2 114:40 f8 bra.-8 (0x10e) The _a_end symbol has not been adjusted. One problem with this bug is that gcc often places labels at the end of .text sections; with midly complex programs and linker scripts, this has led to incorrect code being generated. I think the problem is in the elf32_h8_relax_delete_bytes() function (elf32-h8300.c); symbol values are always compared strictly with toaddr. I think the <= operator should be used instead. The attached patch seems to fix the issue: result.elf: file format elf32-h8300 Disassembly of section .text: 0100 <_a>: 100:19 00 sub.wr0,r0 102:40 fc bra.-4 (0x100) 104:19 11 sub.wr1,r1 106:40 02 bra.+2 (0x10a) 108:19 22 sub.wr2,r2 010a <_a_end>: 10a:19 00 sub.wr0,r0 10c:40 f2 bra.-14 (0x100) 10e:19 11 sub.wr1,r1 110:40 f8 bra.-8 (0x10a) 112:19 22 sub.wr2,r2 114:40 f4 bra.-12 (0x10a) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14899] Missing gas dependency for ld and gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14899 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-01 01:39:35 UTC --- In stage 2, prev-gcc/as has ORIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET="../gas/as-new" ... dir=gas prog=as-new if test -x $scriptdir/../$dir/$prog; then exec $scriptdir/../$dir/$prog else exec $scriptdir/../prev-$dir/$prog fi When we are building gas parallel with bintils, gold, gprof and ld, we may run into race condition that prev-gcc/as checks ../gas/as-new at the same time when we are creating it. So we must build gas before other binutils programs. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
