[Bug binutils/12516] BFD: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2011-02-25 10:18:05 UTC --- The linker is red herring, this is all about objcopy. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12516] BFD: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2011-02-25 12:34:04 UTC --- Fixed with http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519#c2 and http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519#c3 wrongly committed with the wrong PR number. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12519] size generated from .size _function, .-_function is faulty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2011-02-25 12:35:15 UTC --- Yes, you cannot size a function over two sections like that. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12519] size generated from .size _function, .-_function is faulty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25 13:46:01 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-02-25 13:45:55 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : obj-elf.c ld/testsuite : ChangeLog ld/testsuite/ld-mn10300: i135409-3.s ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh64: stolib.s Log message: PR gas/12519 * config/obj-elf.c (elf_frob_symbol): Properly handle size expression. * ld-mn10300/i135409-3.s: Correct .size label reference. * ld-sh/sh64/stolib.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.4410&r2=1.4411 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/obj-elf.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.136&r2=1.137 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1369&r2=1.1370 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mn10300/i135409-3.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1&r2=1.2 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh64/stolib.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1&r2=1.2 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12519] size generated from .size _function, .-_function is faulty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25 13:46:45 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-02-25 13:46:38 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : obj-elf.c ld/testsuite : ChangeLog ld/testsuite/ld-mn10300: i135409-3.s ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh64: stolib.s Log message: PR gas/12519 * config/obj-elf.c (elf_frob_symbol): Properly handle size expression. * ld-mn10300/i135409-3.s: Correct .size label reference. * ld-sh/sh64/stolib.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branch&r1=1.4320.2.16&r2=1.4320.2.17 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/obj-elf.c.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branch&r1=1.133.2.3&r2=1.133.2.4 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branch&r1=1.1322.2.5&r2=1.1322.2.6 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mn10300/i135409-3.s.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branch&r1=1.1&r2=1.1.12.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh64/stolib.s.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branch&r1=1.1&r2=1.1.30.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12519] size generated from .size _function, .-_function is faulty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra 2011-02-25 13:49:21 UTC --- Fixed. Ignore commit messages in comment 2 and 3, which belong to PR12516. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12516] BFD: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25 15:53:27 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-02-25 15:53:25 Modified files: ld/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: ld/testsuite/ld-elf: dynamic1.d dynamic1.ld dynamic1.s Log message: Add a testcase for PR ld/12516. 2011-02-25 H.J. Lu PR ld/12516 * ld-elf/dynamic1.d: New. * ld-elf/dynamic1.ld: Likewise. * ld-elf/dynamic1.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1370&r2=1.1371 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.ld.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12519] size generated from .size _function, .-_function is faulty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25 17:00:33 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-02-25 17:00:30 Modified files: gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/elf: elf.exp Added files: gas/testsuite/gas/elf: bad-size.d bad-size.err bad-size.s Log message: Add a testcase for PR gas/12519. 2011-02-25 H.J. Lu PR gas/12519 * gas/elf/bad-size.d: New. * gas/elf/bad-size.err: Likewise. * gas/elf/bad-size.s: Likewise. * gas/elf/elf.exp: Run bad-size. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1853&r2=1.1854 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/bad-size.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/bad-size.err.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/bad-size.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/elf.exp.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.74&r2=1.75 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Race condition when building binutils with a system libopcodes
Hi there http://people.linaro.org/~lool/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.binutils_2.21.0.20110216-1ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz.txt shows a failed build log of binutils; this build is done with make -j8. The relevant part is: g++-4.4 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gold -I../../gold -I../../gold/../include -I../../gold/../elfcpp -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\"" -DBINDIR="\"/usr/bin\"" -DTOOLBINDIR="\"/usr/i686-linux-gnu/bin\"" -W -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -frandom-seed=incremental.o -g -O2 -MT incremental.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/incremental.Tpo -c -o incremental.o ../../gold/incremental.cc mv -f .deps/i386-opc.Tpo .deps/i386-opc.Plo /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc-4.4 -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -g -O2 -Wno-format-security -release `cat ../bfd/libtool-soversion` -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -o libopcodes.la -rpath /usr/lib dis-buf.lo disassemble.lo dis-init.lo i386-dis.lo i386-opc.lo -Wl,/build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so -L/build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/opcodes/../libiberty/pic -liberty -Wl,-lc,--as-needed,-lm,--no-as-needed libtool: link: gcc-4.4 -shared .libs/dis-buf.o .libs/disassemble.o .libs/dis-init.o .libs/i386-dis.o .libs/i386-opc.o -L/build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/opcodes/../libiberty/pic -liberty -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,/build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so -Wl,-lc -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-lm -Wl,--no-as-needed -Wl,-soname -Wl,libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so -o .libs/libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so as: error while loading shared libraries: /build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/./opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so: file too short make[5]: *** [gold-threads.o] Error 1 make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm -f "libopcodes.so" && ln -s "libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so" "libopcodes.so") libtool: link: ar cru .libs/libopcodes.a dis-buf.o disassemble.o dis-init.o i386-dis.o i386-opc.o libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libopcodes.a libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libopcodes.la" && ln -s "../libopcodes.la" "libopcodes.la" ) libtooldir=`/bin/bash ./libtool --config | sed -n -e 's/^objdir=//p'`; \ if [ -f $libtooldir/libopcodes.a ]; then \ cp $libtooldir/libopcodes.a libopcodes.tmp; \ ranlib libopcodes.tmp; \ /bin/bash ../../opcodes/../move-if-change libopcodes.tmp libopcodes.a; \ else true; fi touch stamp-lib make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/opcodes' what seems to happen here is that the build breaks (in gold) at the exact moment where libopcodes is being built with an error: as: error while loading shared libraries: /build/buildd/binutils-2.21.0.20110216/builddir-single/./opcodes/.libs/libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so: file too short My interpretation is that the system's as which is used to build binutils depends on libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so which is being built here; ldd /usr/bin/as: linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff9349c000) libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so => /usr/lib/libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so (0x7f93fbfd6000) libbfd-2.21.0-system.20110216.so => /usr/lib/libbfd-2.21.0-system.20110216.so (0x7f93fbce6000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x7f93fbae1000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x7f93fb8c9000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x7f93fb523000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f93fc2de000) I suspect libtool manipulates LD_LIBRARY_PATH as to allow the linker to find libs in the libtool .libs directory and that "as" fails to start when another part of the build is generating a libopcodes-2.21.0-system.20110216.so in such a .libs. Does that sound like a plausible explanation, and is this a libtool or a binutils bug? :-) Thanks! NB: * just retrying the build, and it passes, so it is racy; presumably depends whether a process starts when libopcode is being written * I guess this could happen with libbfd too; depends whether the binutils build-system or libtool is adding which libdirs and for how long I guess -- Loïc Minier ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
macro defining 16-bit address offset from and offset
Hello ! I'm trying to get working following simple macro for hours, but still no success. I just want to define two bytes, one containing length of the data and the other one an address - but in words, and therefore divided / 2 ( or >> 1) Is there any chances to get it working ? Please add me into CC i'm not subscribed. .macro link_data astart, aend .byte \aend - \astart .byte \astart / 2 .endm .globl eeprom_start eeprom_start: link_data Manufacturer_ID_String, Manufacturer_ID_String_end Manufacturer_ID_String: .ascii "Skacore Systems.\0" Manufacturer_ID_String_end: .globl eeprom_end eeprom_end: gas output: as test.S -o test.o test.S: Assembler messages: test.S:26: Error: invalid sections for operation on `Manufacturer_ID_String' and `L0' ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: macro defining 16-bit address offset from and offset
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Skacore Systems wrote: > .byte \astart / 2 This is the problem. > as test.S -o test.o > test.S: Assembler messages: > test.S:26: Error: invalid sections for operation on `Manufacturer_ID_String' > and `L0' You can't divide a relocatable symbol like Manufacturer_ID_String by two (unless your target happens to have a relocation that would allow the linker to perform the divide for you). -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12507] Can't build a program with -flto -nostdlib
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12507 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-26 04:38:38 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-02-26 04:38:35 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog plugin.c Log message: Add entry_symbol chain into non_ironly_hash. 2011-02-24 H.J. Lu PR ld/12507 * plugin.c (get_symbols): Don't check entry symbol here. (init_non_ironly_hash): Add entry_symbol chain into non_ironly_hash. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2285&r2=1.2286 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/plugin.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.24&r2=1.25 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
