[Bug ld/12451] --build-id regression
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2011-01-31 10:29:07 UTC --- Hi Jakub, > Actually, it seems upstream binutils probably never handled it right and it > seems Fedora had some local patch for it that got dropped as redundant when it > actually has never been redundant. Sorry about that - it was my fault. I looked at the code and thought that the problem had been fixed by some other changes but I failed to make sure that this assumption was correct. :-( Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12402] ld --disable-plugins configure options doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 03:56:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I was unable to disable ld plugin support on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. The --enable/--disable-plugins option is part of binutils/configure and decides only whether nm and ar have plugin support. There is no way to disable ld plugin support (plugins.m4 is not even included by ld/configure.in; the code you quoted is more of a replacement than an override). This is by design - or to be precise, by review; I originally submitted a patch that did have configure-time control over whether the plugin interface was supported, but during the code review on the mailing list, I was persuaded to make it unconditional. (I can't remember exactly why we decided that, but it's all there in the archives.) > GCC lto/plugin support is currently broken on this target. Is there else anything apart from GCC PR47274, which I'm looking at? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12402] ld --disable-plugins configure options doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 --- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-01 04:30:04 UTC --- > > GCC lto/plugin support is currently broken on this target. > > Is there else anything apart from GCC PR47274, which I'm looking at? There's about three hundred GCC lto/plugin fails. There's a couple of PRs. It's hard to tell whether they are all the same bug or not. Dave -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12402] ld --disable-plugins configure options doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12402 --- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 07:03:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > > > GCC lto/plugin support is currently broken on this target. > > > > Is there else anything apart from GCC PR47274, which I'm looking at? > > There's about three hundred GCC lto/plugin fails. There's a couple > of PRs. Can you quote the PR numbers please? I couldn't figure out which ones you meant from a quick bit of searching. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
