[Bug ld/12369] Symbols present in LTO symbol table resolved as PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY and optimized out appears in final symbol table.

2011-01-07 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12369

Dave Korn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/12374] New: ld fails to convert global hidden symbols to local ones

2011-01-07 Thread jbeulich at novell dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12374

   Summary: ld fails to convert global hidden symbols to local
ones
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.21
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: jbeul...@novell.com


Created attachment 5183
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5183
trivial example

The version of the spec I have says "A hidden symbol contained in a relocatable
object must be either removed or converted to STB_LOCAL binding by the
link-editor when the relocatable object is included in an executable file or
shared object." Nevertheless I see global hidden symbols in executables.

Attaching a trivial sample, to be run through

as -o hidden.o hidden.s
ld -o hidden hidden.o
objdump -t hidden

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils