[Bug gold/12324] GOLD do not diagnoze when non-PIC code is linked into shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324 --- Comment #2 from jh at suse dot de 2010-12-15 13:39:18 UTC --- With GNU ld I get: /abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/gcc -O3 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libnspr4.so -o libnspr4.so ./prvrsion.o io/./prfdcach.o io/./prmwait.o io/./prmapopt.o io/./priometh.o io/./pripv6.o io/./prlayer.o io/./prlog.o io/./prmmap.o io/./prpolevt.o io/./prprf.o io/./prscanf.o io/./prstdio.o threads/./prcmon.o threads/./prrwlock.o threads/./prtpd.o linking/./prlink.o malloc/./prmalloc.o malloc/./prmem.o md/./prosdep.o memory/./prshm.o memory/./prshma.o memory/./prseg.o misc/./pralarm.o misc/./pratom.o misc/./prcountr.o misc/./prdtoa.o misc/./prenv.o misc/./prerr.o misc/./prerror.o misc/./prerrortable.o misc/./prinit.o misc/./prinrval.o misc/./pripc.o misc/./prlog2.o misc/./prlong.o misc/./prnetdb.o misc/./praton.o misc/./prolock.o misc/./prrng.o misc/./prsystem.o misc/./prthinfo.o misc/./prtpool.o misc/./prtrace.o misc/./prtime.o pthreads/./ptsynch.o pthreads/./ptio.o pthreads/./ptthread.o pthreads/./ptmisc.o md/unix/./unix.o md/unix/./unix_errors.o md/unix/./uxproces.o md/unix/./uxrng.o md/unix/./uxshm.o md/unix/./uxwrap.o md/unix/./linux.o md/unix/./os_Linux_x86_64.o -lpthread -ldl /abuild/jh/trunk-install/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /tmp/ccoCztSC.lto.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `PR_Unlock' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /abuild/jh/trunk-install/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value with gold build passes. GNU ld is right that GCC produce non-PIC code here and adding -fPIC fixes the problem. evans:/abuild/jh/build-mozilla-new7/:[2]# /abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/ld-goldnew --version GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.20.51.20100706) 1.9 Copyright 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. more recent golds do not build for me with syntax errors: In file included from ../../gold/script-c.h:211, from yyscript.y:35: ../../gold/yyscript.h:195:1: error: "LENGTH" redefined yyscript.c:124:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition ../../gold/yyscript.h:196:1: error: "LOADADDR" redefined yyscript.c:125:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition ../../gold/yyscript.h:197:1: error: "LOCAL" redefined yyscript.c:126:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition ../../gold/yyscript.h:198:1: error: "LONG" redefined didn't looked yet into why. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12324] GOLD do not diagnoze when non-PIC code is linked into shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-12-15 14:27:03 UTC --- But GNU ld is wrong here. There is absolutely nothing wrong with resolving a R_X86_64_PC32 reloc when creating a shared library. There is no need to recompile with -fPIC if the only problem is a R_X86_64_PC32 reloc. This does not look like a bug in gold. As far as the problems building gold go, there is something strange happening, because you are picking up yyscript.h from the source directory but getting yyscript.c from the build directory. They are both generated files. Certainly the simple fix is going to be to delete them from the source directory. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12324] GOLD do not diagnoze when non-PIC code is linked into shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-12-15 14:43:15 UTC --- Wait, sorry, I'm wrong; there are cases where R_X86_64_PC32 can't be used in a shared library. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12324] GOLD do not diagnoze when non-PIC code is linked into shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-15 15:35:31 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2010-12-15 15:35:28 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog x86_64.cc gold/testsuite : Makefile.am Makefile.in Log message: PR gold/12324 * x86_64.cc (Target_x86_64::Scan::check_non_pic): Give an error for R_X86_64_32 and R_X86_64_PC32. * testsuite/Makefile.am (ver_matching_def.so): Depend on and use ver_matching_def_pic.o. (ver_matching_def_pic.o): New target. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.680&r2=1.681 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/x86_64.cc.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.120&r2=1.121 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/testsuite/Makefile.am.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.152&r2=1.153 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/testsuite/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.161&r2=1.162 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12324] GOLD do not diagnoze when non-PIC code is linked into shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12324 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-12-15 15:46:53 UTC --- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl.tools at gmail dot com |redhat.com | --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-15 19:17:03 UTC --- The proposal is at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/mixed-IR/mixed-IR.pdf It is implemented on hjl/lto-mixed branch at http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/binutils/hjl/x86.git;a=summary -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12325] New: ar --target isn't documented
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12325 Summary: ar --target isn't documented Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com --target option was added to ar. But it isn't documented and "ar --help" doesn't show the new option. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12327] New: x86 relocatable kernel is broken
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327
Summary: x86 relocatable kernel is broken
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com
In linux kernel, we have ‘jiffies = jiffies_64;’ in vmlinux.lds.S.
The jiffies isn’t in any section. In kernel build, there is warning saying
jiffies is an absolute address and can't relocatable. In my system, this cause
boot panic.
Kernel config has
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
Kernel build log has
WARNING: Absolute relocations present
Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name
c102cc8a 00de5a01 R_386_32 c170ba40 jiffies
c103635d 00de5a01 R_386_32 c170ba40 jiffies
c1036658 00de5a01 R_386_32 c170ba40 jiffies
Linker command is
ld -m elf_i386 --emit-relocs --build-id -o vmlinux -T
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/x86/kernel/head_32.o arch/x86/kernel/head32.o
arch/x86/kernel/head.o arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o
--start-group usr/built-in.o arch/x86/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o
mm/built-in.o fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o
crypto/built-in.o block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a
lib/built-in.o arch/x86/lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o
firmware/built-in.o arch/x86/pci/built-in.o arch/x86/oprofile/built-in.o
arch/x86/power/built-in.o arch/x86/video/built-in.o net/built-in.o
--end-group .tmp_kallsyms2.o
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds has
OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf32-i386", "elf32-i386", "elf32-i386")
OUTPUT_ARCH(i386)
ENTRY(phys_startup_32)
jiffies = jiffies_64;
PHDRS {
text PT_LOAD FLAGS(5); /* R_E */
data PT_LOAD FLAGS(7); /* RWE */
note PT_NOTE FLAGS(0); /* ___ */
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12327] x86 relocatable kernel is broken
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-16 04:26:19 UTC --- It is caused by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00169.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
