[Bug ld/11956] relocation truncated to fit R_MIPS_TLS_GD linking xulrunner
-- What|Removed |Added CC||r0bertz at gentoo dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11956 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug of ld 2.20.1
Recently, I update the toolchain(binutils 2.20.1) I meet one issue on LD. When I use LD to link the object with options “�Coformat binary “ and “--start-group �Cend-group” simultaneously, LD fail to find the symbol. When I remove “―oformat”, it can build the ELF file. I try to write some simple case to reproduce it, but in the simple Case, it is OK. (host i686-pc-linux-gnu target i686-cm-linux) The log file is as follow: Linking: elf/rom.bin ../..//lib/elf/libcore.a(bios_keybd.o): In function `biosKeybdShiftStatus': bios_keybd.c:(.text+0x67): undefined reference to `kbdmgrGetShiftFlagStatusByte' ../..//lib/elf/libcore.a(bios_keybd.o): In function `biosKeybdExtendedShiftStatus': bios_keybd.c:(.text+0x8b): undefined reference to `kbdmgrGetShiftFlagStatusByte' I use readelf and objdump to check the symbol, the symbol can be found in the libcore.a. At the same time the LD (2.17.50, 2.18.50) both can work under this situation. So it should be bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11971] New: config.status produces incompatible defines.awk and config.h
config.h was not being created correctly on my Windows 7 (x86_64) machine
using the latest released tools from msys/mingw, causing all sorts of build
problems. After investigating the issue, it was narrowed down to a problem
with how config.status produces and then uses defines.awk. That awk file uses
a regular expression that looks for lines like "#undef VALUE_HERE" to
eventually change them to "#define VALUE_HERE 1" if configure deems it so, but
it wasn't finding them due to mismatches from Windows-style line endings.
This patch fixes the issue in defines.awk, but I'm unsure of where it really
needs to go (because defines.awk is created by config.status, itself created
through configure) since I'm not an autotools expert:
--- defines-orig.awkThu Sep 2 15:52:10 2010
+++ defines.awk Thu Sep 2 15:56:01 2010
@@ -51,8 +51,9 @@
for (key in D) D_is_set[key] = 1
FS = " "
}
-/^[\t ]*#[\t ]*(define|undef)[\t ]+
[_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ]
[_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789]*([\t (]|$)/ {
+/^[\t ]*#[\t ]*(define|undef)[\t ]+
[_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ]
[_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789]*([\t (]
|\r$)/ {
line = $ 0
+ sub(/\r$/, "", line)
split(line, arg, " ")
if (arg[1] == "#") {
defundef = arg[2]
--
Summary: config.status produces incompatible defines.awk and
config.h
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: dhoyt at llnl dot gov
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC target triplet: i686-w64-mingw32
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11971
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11971] config.status produces incompatible defines.awk and config.h
--- Additional Comments From dhoyt at llnl dot gov 2010-09-02 23:10 --- Created an attachment (id=4963) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4963&action=view) Fix for defines.awk -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11971 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: bug of ld 2.20.1
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:25:11PM +0800, 徐超 wrote: > > Recently, I update the toolchain(binutils 2.20.1) I meet one issue > on LD. > When I use LD to link the object with options “–oformat binary “ > and “--start-group –end-group” simultaneously, > LD fail to find the symbol. > > When I remove “—oformat”, it can build the ELF file. I try to write some > simple case to reproduce it, but in the simple > Case, it is OK. > (host i686-pc-linux-gnu target i686-cm-linux) > > The log file is as follow: > Linking: elf/rom.bin > ../..//lib/elf/libcore.a(bios_keybd.o): In function `biosKeybdShiftStatus': > bios_keybd.c:(.text+0x67): undefined reference to > `kbdmgrGetShiftFlagStatusByte' > ../..//lib/elf/libcore.a(bios_keybd.o): In function > `biosKeybdExtendedShiftStatus': > bios_keybd.c:(.text+0x8b): undefined reference to > `kbdmgrGetShiftFlagStatusByte' > I use readelf and objdump to check the symbol, the symbol can be > found in the libcore.a. > At the same time the LD (2.17.50, 2.18.50) both can work under this > situation. > So it should be bug. What happens if you do not use an archive? ie. extract the files in the archive then specify all of them on the ld command line? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11972] New: Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails
$ cat $/bignum.s .fpu neon vmov.i64d16, #-4294967296 @ v2si $ ./as-new ~/bignum.s /home/ryan/bignum.s: Assembler messages: /home/ryan/bignum.s:2: Error: expected or or operand -- `vmov.i64 d16,#-4294967296' Works in 2.20.1. Fails in head and this appears to be due to the following change: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/expr.c.diff?r1=1.83&r2=1.84&cvsroot=src -- Summary: Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rmansfield at qnx dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
