[Bug ld/11933] Differnt linker behavior with incompatible input files
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-21 18:53 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00274.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11933 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11937] New: ld --build-id crash with non-ELF input
ld --build-id may crash with non-ELF input. -- Summary: ld --build-id crash with non-ELF input Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11937 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11937] ld --build-id crash with non-ELF input
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-08-21 19:07 --- Created an attachment (id=4946) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4946&action=view) A testcase [...@gnu-6 build-id]$ make gcc -B./ -m32 -c -o y.o y.c ./ld -m elf_i386 --build-id -o foo pe.o y.o make: *** [foo] Segmentation fault make: *** Deleting file `foo' [...@gnu-6 build-id]$ -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11937 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11938] New: Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!
Hi, First of all I would like to say thanks a lot for finally getting support for SHF_ORDERED, SHF_EXCLUDE, SHN_BEFORE and SHN_AFTER included so that binutils can link correctly with the funky libs in Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris. There is one slight problem though: This is only enabled on SPARC. If you could remove the switch-case blocks that check for EM_SPARC* (binutils/readelf.c, bfd/elf.c, bfd/elfcode.h) and replace them just a simple #ifdef __sun, #endif, that would probably fix the problem. The changes are simple enough but if you want me to come up with a patch just ask. -- Summary: Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC! Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: andyjstormont at googlemail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11938 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6431] ld says: invalid version 3 (max 0)
--- Additional Comments From andyjstormont at googlemail dot com 2010-08-21 20:56 --- This problem is not SPARC specific. I see it on i386-pc-solaris2.11. I also suspect that it is not Solaris specific either as it seems to be caused by filter symbols not being interpreted correctly by binutils. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2524] Solaris versioning glitches when building shared libraries against static ones
--- Additional Comments From andyjstormont at googlemail dot com 2010-08-21 20:59 --- *** Bug 6431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||niki dot waibel at gmx dot ||net http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2524 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6431] ld says: invalid version 3 (max 0)
--- Additional Comments From andyjstormont at googlemail dot com 2010-08-21 20:59 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2524 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
