[Bug binutils/11477] binutils toplevel Makefile is missing install-strip target
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:35 --- Hi Aaro, This is actually the correct behaviour. The strip utility is part of a group of programs called the "binutils". The command to install them is "make install-binutils". There is no support for building the strip program without building the other binutils. Thus there is no "make all-strip" target either. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11477 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11447] default section layout should be improved to reduce pagefaults
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2010-04-02 19:52 --- Subject: Re: New: default section layout should be improved to reduce pagefaults On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:29:31PM -, tglek at mozilla dot com wrote: > Fault #2 > .gnu.version* should be in front of .dyn(sym|str) > > Fault #3 > .dynstr should be in front of .dynsym Why? Both .gnu.version and .dynstr are referred to from .dynsym. ISTM that it would be as easy to improve the loader if it's reading them in a funny order. --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:53 --- Created an attachment (id=4719) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4719&action=view) Reorder .gnu.version, .dynstr and .dynsym -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11447 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11477] binutils toplevel Makefile is missing install-strip target
--- Additional Comments From aaro dot koskinen at iki dot fi 2010-04-13 11:54 --- "install-strip" target should install stripped versions of binutils binaries - the bug report was about that, and not about installing the strip program itself. See: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11477 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11447] default section layout should be improved to reduce pagefaults
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 11:56 --- Hi Taras, This sounds like a loader problem to me, rather than a binutils bug. It is relatively easy to rearrange the order of the .gnu.version, .dynstr and .dynsym sections (see the uploaded patch), but I do not think that this is right way to solve the problem. If the loader is performing some backwards io to get at those sections then I would suggest that it ought to be recoded to keep them in memory after reading them for the first time. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11447 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11430] nm crashes when handling some lib file.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:06 --- Hi Brook, Please could you upload a small test lib file that we can use to examine this problem ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11430 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11419] array "signature[8]" may be used uninitialized
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:19 --- Created an attachment (id=4720) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4720&action=view) Initialize the signature array -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11419 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11419] array "signature[8]" may be used uninitialized
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 12:20 --- Hi Chen, I have applied the uploaded patch to initialise the signature array. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11419 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11496] New: make error
Hello, I try to roll back from binutils 2.20 to 2.18 in my system. I have installed gcc-3.4 and g++-3.4, the ./configure doesn't report any error, however when I try to make I got the error below: Making info in doc make[1]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/doc' if test -f cxxfilt.man; then \ man=cxxfilt.man; \ else \ man=./cxxfilt.man; \ fi; \ sed -e 's/@PROGRAM@/c++filt/' \ -e 's/cxxfilt/c++filt/' < $man \ > c++filt.1 make[1]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/doc' Making info in po make[1]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/po' make[1]: nothing can be done for `info'¡£ make[1]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/po' make[1]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' make[1]: nothing can be done for `info-am'¡£ make[1]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' make all-recursive make[1]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' Making all in doc make[2]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/doc' make[2]: nothing can be done for `all'¡£ make[2]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/doc' Making all in po make[2]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/po' make[2]: nothing can be done for `all'¡£ make[2]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils/po' make[2]: entering directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' make[2]: *** ûÓйæÔò¿ÉÒÔ´´½¨¡°size.o¡±ÐèÒªµÄÄ¿±ê¡°../bfd/bfdver.h¡±. stop. make[2]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] error 1 make[1]:leaving directory `/home/user/desktop/binutils-2.18/binutils' make: *** [all] error 2 I'm wondering how can I make successfully? Best regards -- Summary: make error Product: binutils Version: 2.18 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: swen at pku dot edu dot cn CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11496 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
