[Bug gas/11030] New: Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler
-- Summary: Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler Product: binutils Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: massimo dot ruoroch at polito dot it CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m68k-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11030] Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler
--- Additional Comments From massimo dot ruoroch at polito dot it 2009-11-29 14:50 --- Created an attachment (id=4422) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4422&action=view) The attachment is a patch to solve the problem in version 2.17 The patch add the stldsr instruction to the ISA A+ of Coldfire. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11030] Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler
--- Additional Comments From massimo dot ruoroch at polito dot it
2009-11-29 14:55 ---
The same bug apply also to following versions of binutils. As a test I checked
with the latest one (2.20), and the error is again at line 2029:
{"stldsr", 6, two(0x40e7, 0x46fc),two(0x, 0x), "#w", mcfisa_c },
must be corrected to:
{"stldsr", 6, two(0x40e7, 0x46fc),two(0x, 0x), "#w", mcfisa_aa |
mcfisa_c },
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11030] Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler
--- Additional Comments From massimo dot ruoroch at polito dot it 2009-11-29 14:59 --- Please notice that this bug is aproblem for embedded system developers, as the stldsr instruction is the only atomic instruction which can be used to implement test-and-set operations, missing on the ISA A+ of Coldfire. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11006] A "relaxed" link order of libraries is requested for improved compatibilty
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30 00:27 --- Subject: Bug 11006 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2009-11-30 00:27:45 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog lexsup.c Log message: PR ld/11006 * lexsup.c (parse_args): Allow nested --start-group, --end-group. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2087&r2=1.2088 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/lexsup.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.117&r2=1.118 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11006] A "relaxed" link order of libraries is requested for improved compatibilty
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-11-30 00:29:00 date|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11006] A "relaxed" link order of libraries is requested for improved compatibilty
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-11-30 00:33 --- The patch I've just committed should allow you to implement this behaviour with a simple wrapper script, something like the following: #! /bin/sh exec real_ld --start-group "$@" --end-group You could have done the same prior to my patch, but the script would have been a little more complicated as you'd need to remove existing --start-group/--end-group options. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-11-30 04:55 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:32:26AM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > I am planning on applying the uploaded patch to address this issue, but I > would like your feedback on the new behaviour. With the patch applied your > testcase will disassemble as: > > <.text>: > 0: 002000b0strheq r0, [r0], -r0 You ended up adding a comment for the above unpredictable instruction flagging it as unpredictable. There are thousands of other loads and stores you still need to flag as unpredictable.What they all have in common is they have W=1 and P=0. (bits #21 and #24) for addressing mode 3. Please flag all loads and stores with the following format as unpredictable... 0xX02X 0xX03X 0xX06X 0xX07X 0xX0aX 0xX0bX 0xX0eX ..etc. (Notice they all have bit 24 unset and bit 21 set.) cs -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
