[Bug ld/10881] Multithreading link. Thread-local storage (__thread) is not working?
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot com 2009-11-19 08:37 --- I repeated the test (see test script between lines " cut here ") using gcc-4.4.2. Result the same. cut here - SRC=test_binutils.c OBJ=test_binutils.o OPT="/usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/ccs/lib/values-Xa.o /usr/gnu/lib/gcc/ i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/crtbegin.o test_binutils.o -L/lib -lc /usr/gnu/lib/ gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o" cat > $SRC
[Bug ld/10881] Multithreading link. Thread-local storage (__thread) is not working?
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot com 2009-11-19 08:40 --- Created an attachment (id=4394) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4394&action=view) object file from gcc-4.4.2 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10881 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10881] Multithreading link. Thread-local storage (__thread) is not working?
--- Additional Comments From YLitvinenko at astana dot oilfield dot slb dot com 2009-11-19 08:41 --- Created an attachment (id=4395) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4395&action=view) output from gcc-4.4.2 and ld version 2.20 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10881 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10982] objcopy brings 'invalid operation' when adding debug link section
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-19 10:57 --- According to http://bugs.debian.org/556951 it is a Debian specific eglibc bug. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 11:15 --- Hi Chris, > Just to make sure we're clearmy understanding of my ARM manual is that > we need to specify #0 just like any other number. Not quite. There is one form of Addressing Mode 3 where the #0 is optional. This is Immediate Offset addressing (see page A5-36 of the ARM ARM that you are using). Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 14:01 --- Created an attachment (id=4396) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4396&action=view) Do not prnt zero offset for Immediate Offset addressing -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-19 14:03 --- Hi Guys, Right - I have checked in the third patch in this series. This restores the default behaviour of not printing a zero offset if it is used in Immediate Offset addressing mode. This also resovles the group-relocations.[sd] linker testsuite regression reported by Daniel. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 14:07 --- Subject: Bug 10924 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-19 14:07:11 Modified files: opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/arm: arch4t-eabi.d arch4t.d arm7t.d armv1.d wince_inst.d xscale.d Log message: PR binutils/10924 * gas/arm/arch4t-eabi.d: Restore previous expected dissambly of instructions using Immediate Offset addressing with an offset of zero. * gas/arm/arch4t.d: Likewise. * gas/arm/arm7t.d: Likewise. * gas/arm/xscale.d: Likewise. * gas/arm/wince-inst.d: Remove 'p' suffix from cmp, cmn, teq and tst instructions. PR binutils/10924 * arm-dis.c (print_insn_arm): Do not print an offset of zero when decoding Immediaate Offset addressing. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1506&r2=1.1507 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/arm-dis.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.113&r2=1.114 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1596&r2=1.1597 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/arch4t-eabi.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3&r2=1.4 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/arch4t.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.6&r2=1.7 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/arm7t.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.17&r2=1.18 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/armv1.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.6&r2=1.7 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/wince_inst.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.7&r2=1.8 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/xscale.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.11&r2=1.12 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10980] Please support more options available from old ld
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-19 16:53 --- Thanks for your fast reply. All your information was forwarded to the actual maintainer of the packages. And yes, the extra space was the problem with relro... haven't seen that there is a extra space. It was reported to http://bugs.debian.org/557077 with patch. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
