[Bug ld/10858] ld generate broken PIE binaries on MIPS
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-10-29 08:33 --- Unfortunately, bisecting takes time, especially on my slow machine. What I can tell for now is that the CVS from 2008/07/03 works the CVS from 2008/08/14 does not work. About the gcc 4.3 issue not activating pie with the -pie flag, it only happens if the output filename contains fpie. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10858 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10865] New: The entry point is mainCRTStartup
The documentation of ld [1] says that the default ENTRY point is start. This
is not universally true; the default ENTRY point in MinGW is mainCRTStartup.
Steps to reproduce:
gcc -nostartfiles the following source code without crt2.o:
#include
#include
int begin() { puts ("begin"); return 0; }
int start() { puts ("start"); return 0; }
int mainCRTStartup() { puts ("CRT"); return 0; }
The program prints "CRT", not "start".
In order to solve the problem, modify the documentation to say that the
initial symbol is implementation-dependent.
[1] http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Entry-Point.html#Entry-Point>
--
Summary: The entry point is mainCRTStartup
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: giecrilj at stegny dot 2a dot pl
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: mingw32
GCC host triplet: mingw32
GCC target triplet: mingw32
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: Syntax of '.set' assembler directive in GNU assembler
Thank you Alan. Alan Modra wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:59:33PM -0700, Jeffi Edward.J wrote: >> I could see in GNU assembler manual that for HPPA target, the syntax of >> .set >> directive is >> SYMBOL: .set value # (same as Diab assembly syntax) > > I think the manual is lying. HPPA supports a different .equ syntax > "symbol .equ value" but not a different .set syntax. > >> Is there any option to make GNU assembler to understand the above syntax >> for >> powerpc target? > > No. > > -- > Alan Modra > Australia Development Lab, IBM > > > ___ > bug-binutils mailing list > bug-binutils@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Syntax-of-%27.set%27-assembler-directive-in-GNU-assembler-tp26089763p26107113.html Sent from the Gnu - Binutils - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10842] Segmentation fault in GOLD when using GCC's LTO plugin
--- Additional Comments From ccoutant at google dot com 2009-10-29 18:01 --- Fixed with: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-10/msg00529.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10842 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10304] ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |ccoutant at google dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10304] ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.
--- Additional Comments From ccoutant at google dot com 2009-10-29 21:15 --- Fixed with: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00489.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
