[Bug binutils/10656] readelf: move a variable to a header file
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-25 09:58 --- Subject: Bug 10656 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-09-25 09:57:50 Modified files: gprof : ChangeLog hist.c hist.h binutils : ChangeLog dwarf.h readelf.c Log message: PR 10656 * readelf.c: Remove duplicate declaration of variable do_wide. * dwarf.h: Add export of do_wide. * hist.h: Move declaration of histograms and num_histograms variables from here to... * hist.c: ...here. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gprof/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.266&r2=1.267 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gprof/hist.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.22&r2=1.23 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gprof/hist.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.10&r2=1.11 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1539&r2=1.1540 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/dwarf.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.11&r2=1.12 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/readelf.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.462&r2=1.463 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10656] readelf: move a variable to a header file
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 09:59 --- Hi Dmitry, Thanks for reporting these problems and for providing patches to fix them. I have applied your patches along with the following changelog entries. Cheers Nick binutils/ChangeLog 2009-09-25 Dimitry Gorbachev PR 10656 * readelf.c: Remove duplicate declaration of variable do_wide. * dwarf.h: Add export of do_wide. gprof/ChangeLog 2009-09-25 Dimitry Gorbachev PR 10656 * hist.h: Move declaration of histograms and num_histograms variables from here to... * hist.c: ...here. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:11 --- Hi Bill, The simple.o file that I created must be different from the one that you are using. Please could you try uploading it to this PR again. Say as a compressed tarball for example ? Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4229) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4229&action=view) Update previous patch to work with x86 binaries -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-25 10:32 --- Hi Niki, OK, please try out the newly uploaded patch (pr10478.x86.patch). This should be applied on top of the previously patched sources, if you are using them, or just straight to the current mainline binutils code if you are using that. Let me know how it goes. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10695] New: [2.20 regression] ld links libgcc3_uno.so which results in non-working uno2cpp bridge
libgcc3_uno.so is built as part of OpenOffice.org; when built with 2.19.91 an exception is thrown; when built with 2.19.1, the application starts fine. Tracked down to the patches for the ARM unwind table linker processing. - attaching revert.diff, when applied to the 2.20 branch, builds a working library. - http://people.canonical.com/~doko/tmp/test.tar.gz has the testcase, together with two prebuilt libraries. I don't know if this is a bug in binutils, or in the uno2cpp bridge for ARM. -- Summary: [2.20 regression] ld links libgcc3_uno.so which results in non-working uno2cpp bridge Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: doko at debian dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10695] [2.20 regression] ld links libgcc3_uno.so which results in non-working uno2cpp bridge
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2009-09-25 13:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4230) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4230&action=view) reversion of the unwinder changes -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10695 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10656] readelf: move a variable to a header file
--- Additional Comments From d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-09-25 18:17 --- Thanks! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10656 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/9790] LD's "export everything" logic problematic
--- Additional Comments From mail at colinfinck dot de 2009-09-25 23:44 --- This problem persists in current binutils versions, so we're still required to use this patch and cannot use vanilla binutils. We're actually hitting this problem, because all our NT-like drivers have to be linked with the same -shared option, which is used for building DLLs. Kai's suggestion of adding additional command line options has some disadvantages in my opinion: If we add something like "--nt-driver", people could be confused about its actual effect. Also, if there would ever be other modules, which have to be built with -shared, but shall not export any symbols, the name of this option wouldn't fit anymore and confuse people even more. An option like "--dont-export-all-symbols" is also no reasonable solution as it would be an addition to the already existing --export-all-symbols. If both options would be present, people could be irritated and becoming unsure about the default if none of them is specified. So after all, I still prefer applying the patch I posted here. This would change the default to exporting no symbols in all cases. If you then need to export all symbols (like in the Obj-C case Kai pointed out), the long-existing --export-all-symbols option could still be used. CC'ing Kai, hope you don't mind.. -- What|Removed |Added CC||Kai dot Tietz at onevision ||dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9790 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-26 00:35 --- looks very good now: === $ uname -a SunOS x4150-1.dev.nlatlu.wipro.com 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris $ size /usr/lib/libC.so.* textdata bss dec hex filename 6362954481049 70126 111ee /usr/lib/libC.so.3 304158 52968 59804 416930 65ca2 /usr/lib/libC.so.5 === -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/9790] LD's "export everything" logic problematic
--- Additional Comments From mail at colinfinck dot de 2009-09-26 00:51 --- Created an attachment (id=4232) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4232&action=view) Updated patch This updated patch has been created against current binutils. It also removes some now unneeded lines, since 'if (NE == 0)' is already checked below. -- What|Removed |Added Attachment #3688 is|0 |1 obsolete|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9790 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
ar fails to ignore -X32_64
Title: Alan M. Feldstein
fonzie% /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar V
GNU ar (GNU Binutils)2.19.1
Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms
of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later
version.
This program has absolutely no warranty.
fonzie% /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar -X32_64 V
/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar: illegal option -- X
Usage: /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar [emulation options]
[-]{dmpqrstx}[abcfilNoPsSuvV] [member-name] [count] archive-file file...
/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar -M [
commands:
d - delete file(s) from the archive
m[ab] - move file(s) in the archive
p - print file(s) found in the archive
q[f] - quick append file(s) to the archive
r[ab][f][u] - replace existing or insert new file(s) into the archive
t - display contents of archive
x[o] - extract file(s) from the archive
command specific modifiers:
[a] - put file(s) after [member-name]
[b] - put file(s) before [member-name] (same as [i])
[N] - use instance [count] of name
[f] - truncate inserted file names
[P] - use full path names when matching
[o] - preserve original dates
[u] - only replace files that are newer than current archive
contents
generic modifiers:
[c] - do not warn if the library had to be created
[s] - create an archive index (cf. ranlib)
[S] - do not build a symbol table
[T] - make a thin archive
[v] - be verbose
[V] - display the version number
@ - read options from
emulation options:
No emulation specific options
/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-aix6.1/bin/ar: supported targets: aixcoff-rs6000
aixcoff64-rs6000 srec symbolsrec tekhex binary ihex
fonzie%
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.19/binutils/ar-cmdline.html#ar-cmdline
states
ar
ignores an initial option spelt `-X32_64',
for
compatibility with AIX. The behaviour produced by this option is the
default for gnu ar.
ar does not support any of
the other
`-X' options; in particular, it
does not support -X32
which is the default for AIX ar.
--
Alan Feldstein
alan.feldst...@computer.org
http://www.linkedin.com/in/feldstein
mobile: +1 585 415 6682
See
who we know in
common
Want a signature like
this?
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
