[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 
11:37 ---
Subject: Bug 10263

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-06-15 11:37:26

Modified files:
include: ChangeLog dis-asm.h 
opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c 
binutils   : ChangeLog objdump.c 

Log message:
PR 10263
* arm-dis.c (print_insn): Ignore is_data if the user has requested
the disassembly of data as well as instructions.

* objdump.c (disassemble_bytes): Set the DISASSEMBLE_DATA bit in
the flags field of the disassemble_info structure if the -D switch
is in operation.

* dis-asm.h (struct disassemble_info): New value for the flags
field.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.448&r2=1.449
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/dis-asm.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.72&r2=1.73
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1398&r2=1.1399
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/arm-dis.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.95&r2=1.96
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1483&r2=1.1484
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/objdump.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.157&r2=1.158



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10263

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 11:39 
---
Hi Mikael,

  Ok - I have checked the patch in along with the changelog entries below.

Cheers
  Nick

include/ChangeLog
2009-06-15  Nick Clifton  

* dis-asm.h (struct disassemble_info): New value for the flags
field.

binutils/ChangeLog
2009-06-15  Nick Clifton  

PR 10263
* objdump.c (disassemble_bytes): Set the DISASSEMBLE_DATA bit in
the flags field of the disassemble_info structure if the -D switch
is in operation.

opcodes/ChangeLog
2009-06-15  Nick Clifton  

PR 10263
* arm-dis.c (print_insn): Ignore is_data if the user has requested
the disassembly of data as well as instructions.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10263

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10188] windres should be able to generate deps.

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:03 
---
Created an attachment (id=3998)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3998&action=view)
Application for FSF copyright assignment


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10188

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10188] windres should be able to generate deps.

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:04 
---
Hi Roger,

  Thank you for submitting this enhancement.  Before we can go any further
however, it is necessary for you to complete an FSF binutils copyright
assignment.  Please could you fill out the uploaded form and then send it off in
order to start the ball rolling ?

Cheers
  Nick Clifton


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10188

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10173] cr16 disassembly prefixes some addressess with "0x0x"

2009-06-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 
15:25 ---
Subject: Bug 10173

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-06-15 15:24:54

Modified files:
opcodes: ChangeLog cr16-dis.c 

Log message:
PR 10173
* cr16-dis.c (print_arg): Avoid printing the 0x prefix twice.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1399&r2=1.1400
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/cr16-dis.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.5&r2=1.6



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10173

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10173] cr16 disassembly prefixes some addressess with "0x0x"

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:25 
---
Created an attachment (id=3999)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3999&action=view)
Avoid printing the 0x prefix twice


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10173

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10173] cr16 disassembly prefixes some addressess with "0x0x"

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:26 
---
Hi Timo,

  Thanks for reporting this problem.  I have applied the uploaded patch in order
to prevent the duplicate printing of the 0x prefix.

Cheers
  Nick


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10173

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/10186] Wrong machine code for the Thumb2 instruction SEV.W

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:40 
---
Created an attachment (id=4000)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4000&action=view)
Fix binary value of SEV.W instruction


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10186

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/10186] Wrong machine code for the Thumb2 instruction SEV.W

2009-06-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-06-15 15:42 
---
Hi Anthony,

  Thanks for reporting this bug.  I have checked in the uploaded patch to fix
the problem along with these changelog entries.

Cheers
  Nick

opcodes/ChangeLog
   PR 10186
* arm-dis.c (thumb32_opcodes): Fix binary value of SEV.W
instruction.

gas/ChangeLog
PR 10186
* config/tc-arm.c (T16_32_TAB): Fix binary value of SEV.W
instruction.

gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR 10186
* gas/arm/thumb32.d: Fix expected binary value of SEV.W instruction.



-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10186

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/10186] Wrong machine code for the Thumb2 instruction SEV.W

2009-06-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-15 
15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 10186

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-06-15 15:42:36

Modified files:
opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c 
gas: ChangeLog 
gas/config : tc-arm.c 
gas/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
gas/testsuite/gas/arm: thumb32.d 

Log message:
PR 10186
* arm-dis.c (thumb32_opcodes): Fix binary value of SEV.W
instruction.

* gas/arm/thumb32.d: Fix expected binary value of SEV.W instruction.

* config/tc-arm.c (T16_32_TAB): Fix binary value of SEV.W
instruction.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1400&r2=1.1401
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/arm-dis.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.96&r2=1.97
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3825&r2=1.3826
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.385&r2=1.386
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1491&r2=1.1492
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/thumb32.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.29&r2=1.30



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10186

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


objdump for old ARM7TDMI (ARMv4T) showing instructions for newer architectures?!

2009-06-15 Thread chris
Hello!  I care about the success of GNU very much and wanted some feedback on
what to do about a potential bug in objdump for ARM

I'm examining the output of "objdump -D --target=binary -m arm7tdmi" and seeing
instructions that do not exist on the ancient ARM7TDMI cores.

For example, mrcc, blx and ldc2 only appeared in ARMv5 or later but I see them
in the output with command line switches above.

(I see same problems with "-m armv4t".)

I'm using version 2.19.1-multiarch from Ubuntu 9.04.

Is this a genuine bug or must I use different switches.

Sincerely,

chris


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10287] New: Test tls_shared_gnu2_test failed

2009-06-15 Thread peter dot kovar at gmail dot com
make check

PASS: tls_shared_gnu2_gd_to_ie_test
v4: expected 4, found -387974407
Test t4 failed
(int) v12.hi: expected 115, found -387974407
Test t12 failed
v2: expected 20, found 0
Test t_last failed
v2: expected 20, found 0
Test t_last failed
v2: expected 0, found 711070900
Test t2 failed
v4: expected 4, found 1904110544
Test t4 failed
/bin/sh: line 4:  3645 Segmentation fault  ${dir}$tst
FAIL: tls_shared_gnu2_test
PASS: tls_static_test

-- 
   Summary: Test tls_shared_gnu2_test failed
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: peter dot kovar at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10287

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/10287] Test tls_shared_gnu2_test failed

2009-06-15 Thread ian at airs dot com

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com  2009-06-16 05:51 ---
Thanks.  This is a known problem.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ccoutant at google dot com
 AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot   |ian at airs dot com
   |redhat dot com  |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10287

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils