[Bug gold/5990] running out of file descriptors when linking >1024 files
--- Additional Comments From shausman at trolltech dot com 2008-07-25 10:35 --- I still see the problem, the error message is different though: ld: out of file descriptors and couldn't close any -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5990 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug ld/6766] New: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
Hi H.J. Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"? If we are creating an executable then yes. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6766] Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-07-25 15:48 --- Subject: Re: New: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"? Hi H.J. > Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"? If we are creating an executable then yes. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6766 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6761] abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-07-25 16:00 --- Subject: Re: abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:12:17PM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > The problem with GDB has two parts. Firstly the code in > dwarf2read.c:read_partial_die that processes the DW_AT_sibiling attribute does > not check to see if the offset is valid. This is what eventually leads to the > seg-fault. The second problem is much bigger - GDB is not processing the > relocs > in the object file before attempting to interpret the debug sections and this > is > why it is having problems. Current versions do this and have for a long time; search for symfile_relocate_debug_section. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug ld/6761] abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld
Hi Daniel, Current versions do this and have for a long time; search for symfile_relocate_debug_section. Interesting. Would you care to try running a recent gdb on Bjarne's test file org.o (found in the dwarf_bug.zip archive that was uploaded to this PR) ? I tried it and gdb did segfault and the problem did seem to be that it was looking at the un-relocated contents of the .debug_info section. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6761] abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-07-25 16:41 --- Subject: Re: abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld Hi Daniel, > Current versions do this and have for a long time; search for > symfile_relocate_debug_section. Interesting. Would you care to try running a recent gdb on Bjarne's test file org.o (found in the dwarf_bug.zip archive that was uploaded to this PR) ? I tried it and gdb did segfault and the problem did seem to be that it was looking at the un-relocated contents of the .debug_info section. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6761 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
