[Bug binutils/6526] Building for interix 3.5 requires _ALL_SOURCE defined

[Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de]

--- Additional Comments From Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de  2008-06-23 
19:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm not sure.  Maybe Ralf knows?

Not sure if you're addressing me (but if you are, please Cc: me,
thanks).

FWIW, the thread in question is


and mentions the patches applied to Autoconf and gnulib.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx
   ||dot de


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6526

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:19:36PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:59 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > The release branch has the generated files in it.  This is how
> > binutils releases have traditionally been managed.  It's the snapshots
> > before the final release that cause this problem.
> 
> Hi Daniel;
> 
> I don't think this is true, at least not in this situation.  Before I
> posted the bug I checked cvsweb and there is no "elf.texi" file checked
> into the bfd/doc directory in CVS, either on the trunk or on the
> binutils-2-18 branch.

For 2.18, it's revision 1.1.18.1 of elf.texi.  I had to go into the
Attic to find it.  Cvsweb does not appear to do The Right Thing for
files that do not exist on trunk.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:51:22PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Still and all, it's something that would be great to have fixed in the
> official release distributions; if for no other reason than it would
> save you guys a lot of bug reports about problems with makeinfo (in
> researching this bug I saw quite a number of these).

Oh, agreed... I'm thinking about the best solution.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

[Paul Smith]

On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:59 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The release branch has the generated files in it.  This is how
> binutils releases have traditionally been managed.  It's the snapshots
> before the final release that cause this problem.

Hi Daniel;

I don't think this is true, at least not in this situation.  Before I
posted the bug I checked cvsweb and there is no "elf.texi" file checked
into the bfd/doc directory in CVS, either on the trunk or on the
binutils-2-18 branch.

Thanks!



___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Re: Build error with binutils 2.18: requires makeinfo but shouldn't

[Paul Smith]

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:57 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> For 2.18, it's revision 1.1.18.1 of elf.texi.  I had to go into the
> Attic to find it.  Cvsweb does not appear to do The Right Thing for
> files that do not exist on trunk.

Oh blerg.  OK, thanks.

Still and all, it's something that would be great to have fixed in the
official release distributions; if for no other reason than it would
save you guys a lot of bug reports about problems with makeinfo (in
researching this bug I saw quite a number of these).

Cheers!



___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils