[Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without gcc
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-28 19:55 --- Native build with gcc 4.2.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 fails: /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bf d -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I. -I../../src/bfd -I../../src/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wm issing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o elf64-hppa.lo ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bfd -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX - D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I. -I../../src/bfd -I../.. /src/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c -DPIC -o .libs/elf64-hppa.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'allocate_global_data_opd': ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: implicit declaration of function 'allo ca' ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b uilt-in function 'alloca' ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'elf64_hppa_finalize_opd': ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:2189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b uilt-in function 'alloca' make[4]: *** [elf64-hppa.lo] Error 1 -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5322] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-28 21:37 --- Yes, it looks like expect linked against tcl8.3 has this problem. I always had more problems with expect linked against tcl8.4 although I haven't tested this recently. The line that causes the problem seems to be in gas-defs.exp: set output_file [regsub ">&" $redir ""] -- What|Removed |Added Summary|ERROR: tcl error sourcing |ERROR: tcl error sourcing |/home/dave/binutils-|/home/dave/binutils- |2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/ga|2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/ga |s/all/ |s/all/gas.exp |gas.exp | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5322 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5524] New: ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": N o such file or directory
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissin g-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -o libopcodes.la -rpath /opt/gnu64/lib -release `c at ../bfd/libtool-soversion` dis-buf.lo disassemble.lo dis-init.lo hppa-dis.lo -Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so libtool: link: gcc -shared -Wl,+h -Wl,libopcodes-2.18.50.20071228.sl -o .libs/li bopcodes-2.18.50.20071228.sl .libs/dis-buf.o .libs/disassemble.o .libs/dis-init .o .libs/hppa-dis.o -lc -Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/lib bfd.so ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": N o such file or directory Fatal error. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status It seems like the make file is using the wrong shared library extension. SHARED_LIBADD = -Wl,/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so -- Summary: ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so ": N o such file or directory Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5524 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5524] ld: I/O error, file "/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": No such file or directory
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-28
21:57 ---
Looks like the configure.in files need updating. For example, we have this
in opcodes:
if test "$enable_shared" = "yes"; then
case "${host}" in
*-*-cygwin*)
SHARED_LDFLAGS="-no-undefined"
SHARED_LIBADD="-L`pwd`/../bfd -lbfd -L`pwd`/../libiberty -liberty -L`pwd`/
../intl -lintl -lcygwin"
;;
*)
SHARED_LIBADD="-Wl,`pwd`/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so"
SHARED_DEPENDENCIES="../bfd/libbfd.la"
;;
esac
fi
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld: I/O error, file |ld: I/O error, file
|"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/op|"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/op
|codes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so|codes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so
|": N|": No such file or directory
|o such file or directory|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5524
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5322] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/binutils-2.17.50/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-29 00:51 --- Patch here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00159.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5322 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without gcc
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-29 01:48 --- This is now fixed for builds with gcc by the following change: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00160.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5526] New: eh support is broken
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01393.html versus http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01394.html The former was with ld 2.18.50.20071227. The latter was with 2.18.50.20070929. In the g++ tests, I see stuff like Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/ home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc /gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C -nostdinc++ -I/home/dave/ gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/g cc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libst dc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/ home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -ansi -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long -fno-show-column -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob jdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-l inux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libib erty -lm -o ./ice990323-2.exe(timeout = 300) PASS: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc+ +-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs :/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:.:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./ libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/s rc/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-li nux/libstdc++-v3/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libmudflap/.libs :/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libssp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob jdir/hppa-linux/libgomp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc:/home/dave/gnu /gcc-4.3/objdir/./prev-gcc:/usr/lib/debug terminate called after throwing an instance of 'A >' terminate called recursively FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C execution test In the libstdc++ tests, I see stuff like Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc -B/hom e/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa -linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/ src/.libs -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt/ gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/lib/ -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa- linux/include -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/sys-include -g -O2 -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g - O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++ -I/home/dave/ gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/ gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/ libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -Wl,--gc-sections /home/ dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_d erivation.cc-include bits/stdc++.h ./libtestc++.a -lm -o ./cons_virtual_d erivation.exe(timeout = 600) /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created. output is: /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created. FAIL: 18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_derivation.cc (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created. -- Summary: eh support is broken Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
