[Bug gas/5136] Error message "rel too far BFD_RELOC_8" used with BFD_RELOC_16
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:07 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in the obvious fix for the error message. I will leave clarification of the error messages up to the BlackFin maintainers, if they feel that they need it. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5136 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5135] Spelling fix for Unknown in config/tc-bfin.c
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:11 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix the two "Unkown" spelling mistakes in the tc-bfin.c file. The rest of this PR is a duplicate of 5121. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5135 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5133] Error message mismatches with the checked range
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:17 --- Hi Jorma, The term "large" can have an absolute sense as opposed to a signed sense, but I take your point. I have checked in a patch to change the message to read "invalid immediate: %ld is out of range", which is consistent with the other error messages produced in this particular function. The rest of this PR is a duplicate of PR 5121. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5133 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5134] Range checking mismatch with "offset too big" in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 10:20 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to change the text of the error message to "offset out of range". Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5134 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5121] Strings in config/atof-ieee.c not included with gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:12 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5121 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5122] Strings in config/xtensa-relax.c not included with gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:13 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5122 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5123] Reference to config/atof-vax.c missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:14 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5123 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5126] Missing strings in gas-2.17.90.pot (from config/obj-som.c)
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:15 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5126 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5127] Reference to config/tc-alpha.c:736 missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:16 --- Hi Jorma, I do not understand what you mean with this bug report. Please could you explain in some more detail ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5127 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5128] Missing debug_exp string in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:18 --- Hi Jorma, This text occurs in debugging code which is not seen by normal users of the assembler. It does not need to be internationalized. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5128 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5129] Several config/tc-arc.c strings missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:18 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix these problems. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5131] Msgid "bad barrier type" missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:19 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this problem. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5131 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5132] Some line numbers of config/tc-arm.c mismatch in gas-2.17.90.pot references
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:19 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this problem. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5132 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5137] Missing msgids for gas-2.17.90.pot from config/tc-bfin.c
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:20 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this problem. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5137 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5143] Missing config/tc-frv.c msgids in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:21 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this problem. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5143 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5124] Two missing msgids in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:14 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5124 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5125] Third missing msgid in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:15 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5125 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5142] Missing msgids and references from config/tc-dlx.c in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:36 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to fix this problem. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5127] Reference to config/tc-alpha.c:736 missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-10-08 15:36 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Jorma,
>
> I do not understand what you mean with this bug report. Please could you
> explain in some more detail ?
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Sorry,
I did not explain this correctly. The source code looks like this:
static void
debug_exp (expressionS tok[], int ntok)
{
int i;
fprintf (stderr, "debug_exp: %d tokens", ntok);
for (i = 0; i < ntok; i++)
{
expressionS *t = &tok[i];
const char *name;
switch (t->X_op)
{
default:name = "unknown"; break;
In gas-2.17.90.pot is only one "unknown" msgid (for config/tc-more.c:1987)
I think that this debug message should be translated also (and there should be a
reference to config/tc-alpha.c:736 in the commment of the msgid "unknown" in
gas-2.17.90.pot).
best regards,
Jorma
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5127
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5127] Reference to config/tc-alpha.c:736 missing in gas-2.17.90.pot
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-08 15:43 --- Hi Jorma, OK, I understand now, but a fix is not necessary. This code is used only when debugging the alpha port of the assembler. It is not enabled by default and no normal user will ever see it. Thus it does not need any translation. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5127 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From happyarch at gmail dot com 2007-10-08 15:54 --- when good comes to bad, bad come to good.. year 2003: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2003-06/msg00653.html year 2004: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00160.html year 2005: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2005-02/msg00350.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4558] branch on register condition accepts relocations >= 128K
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09 03:44 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00155.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4453] ar doesn't recognize ELF64 on mips
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09 04:08 --- Is this still the case with current binutils? A 2007-09-14 patch may have fixed this problem. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4453 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4346] section options not passed to linker
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-09 04:27 --- If an option isn't being passed to the linker, then that is a gcc driver bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4346 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5138] Bit range mismatch in config/tc-cris.c
--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-09 05:09 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, it's 8-bit signed *and* 8-bit unsigned: perhaps saying > "not in 8-bit signed or unsigned range" would sound better to you? > If you have a better wording to suggest, feel free. > > brgds, H-P Yes, that is one way to get around that, but there are still holes in that error message. If it is a signed number, we don't catch values between 127...255 and if it is an unsigned number, we don't catch values between -128 and 0. And there is no way to know, which one we have, I suppose. If there are many immediate values, one could always record the range of values and if most values are either in range 0...127 or 128...255 we can suppose that the immediate value is unsigned value and values below zero should be illegal. But if an unsigned value is never over 127 or the first value we record is illegal, this kind of intelligence does not work. If we cannot warn about "hole" values, this single error message is still a bit limited, even in its extended format. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5138 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5138] Bit range mismatch in config/tc-cris.c
--- Additional Comments From karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-09 05:11 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, it's 8-bit signed *and* 8-bit unsigned: perhaps saying > "not in 8-bit signed or unsigned range" would sound better to you? > If you have a better wording to suggest, feel free. > > brgds, H-P Yes, that is one way to get around that, but there are still holes in that error message. If it is a signed number, we don't catch values between 127...255 and if it is an unsigned number, we don't catch values between -128 and 0. And there is no way to know, which one we have, I suppose. If there are many immediate values, one could always record the range of values and if most values are either in range 0...127 or 128...255 we can suppose that the immediate value is unsigned value and values below zero should be illegal. But if an unsigned value is never over 127 or the first value we record is illegal, this kind of intelligence does not work. If we cannot warn about "hole" values, this single error message is still a bit limited, even in its extended format. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5138 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
